LONDON, Dec 18 (Reuters) – Shipping firms operating in northern Europe will not get the full benefit of plunging oil prices as they face higher fuel costs and potential insurance problems from sulphur regulations coming into force early next year.
Shipping companies and industry watchers also say that moving to a low sulphur fuel that is around two thirds more costly than the current standard will drive some companies to skirt the rules, putting those who do comply at a major disadvantage.
“The total costs for all will go up, despite the drop in prices, because you are about to burn much more expensive bunkers,” Chief Shipping Analyst Peter Sand with industry association BIMCO told the Reuters Global Oil Forum this week.
Under European Union rules from Jan. 1, all ships operating in the North Sea, Baltic Sea and English Channel will have to use a fuel with a maximum sulphur content of 0.1 percent, against 1 percent currently.
While the change has been years in coming, Sand and others in the industry say there are still shippers who will find it hard to follow the rules, which can increase costs as much as $20,000 per round trip from the Baltic to Europe.
Others say that relatively low fines and expectations of spotty enforcement in Europe also undercut the preparations from some segments of the industry.
“That’s a quantum leap downward in sulphur emissions,” said Stephen Harris, senior vice president of the marine practice at Marsh, a global insurance broker. “We knew it was headed this way…but ship owners can’t adapt their entire fleet in two years.”
Ferry company DFDS Seaways spent three years and roughly 100 euros million retrofitting its ships with scrubbers – devices that allow them to capture sulphur burned from fuels that would not otherwise be allowed.
It has cut three passenger routes this year as a result.
“The sulphur rules have contributed directly to these closures,” DFDS chief executive Niels Smedegaard. “We are hit hard by this.”
For vessels travelling through Europe that do not have scrubbers, which are the majority, there is no uniform specification for the 0.1 “marine gasoil” most will use.
This means that fuels that comply with the rules could react differently in individual engines, and should be tested extensively before use – something the largest companies have spent years and millions of dollars doing.
The process of switching engines from higher sulphur fuels, which run at far higher temperatures, to 0.1, also requires careful protocols.
Experts say ships that try to comply at the last minute could lose power in the choppy, highly trafficked waters leading into Europe.
This happened to a string of vessels off the California coast when that state made the switch to low sulphur fuels in 2009.
“If you approach the same loss of power by percentage…you’re going to have one ship every three days have a loss of power,” said Robin Meech, the head of Marine and Energy Consulting Limited.
“Everybody dismisses this. But when we get the first ship floating around for a day or two in a major shipping channel, people will care.”
According to Harris, insurers are adding contract clauses that require ships to have such protocols in place.
But the longer term could bring bigger problems; the more highly refined marine gasoil leaves engine deposits that over time can cause clogging and even failure. Insurers are only beginning to digest this, but it could lead to widespread claims and more costs.
“This is the stuff of litigation,” Harris said. “We won’t know how big of a problem it is until we start to see these claims.” (Additional reporting by Jonathan Saul; Editing by Michael Urquhart)
SINGAPORE, April 24 (Reuters) – Demand for liquefied natural gas (LNG) to power ships will rise this year on attractive prices, while more dual-fuel vessels join the global fleet, industry executives said....
ROME (Reuters) – An Italian judge on Friday cleared three migrant sea rescue charities that had been accused of abetting irregular immigration in complicity with human traffickers, throwing out a case opened...
(Bloomberg) — The closure of one of the East Coast’s busiest ports after the collapse of Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge has so far not led to broad price increases,...
April 19, 2024
Total Views: 2193
Why Join the gCaptain Club?
Access exclusive insights, engage in vibrant discussions, and gain perspectives from our CEO.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.