north pacific storm animation

click for animation

16 January Update: 

A major hurricane force storm continues over the western North Pacific with winds up to 65 knots and significant wave heights up to 20 meters (about 66 feet)! The significant wave height is the average of the 1/3 highest waves which means that some waves will be higher. Given a significant wave of 20 meters, about 1 in 10 waves could be 25 meters (82 feet) and 1 out of 100 could be as high as 33 meters (108 feet)!

sea state analysis noaa

Previously reported on 15 January:

A very dangerous 936 mb storm peaked today over the western North Pacific with a min pressure of 932 mb and is moving northeast at 25 knots with hurricane force winds and very high sea and swell conditions.  Hurricane Sandy, by comparison, reached a minimum pressure of 940 millibars and was the largest Atlantic hurricane in recorded history.

At 12Z 15 January the center of the storm was near 42N/163E with winds of Force 11 or higher (60-85 knots) and waves 12-18 meters (39-59 feet) within 300NM west and southwest of the center and winds forces 9-11 and waves 5.5-14 meters (18-46 feet) up to 540NM from the center.

This storm and will now weaken slowly as it moves northeastward.

Keep in mind that the wave heights here are the significant wave height which is defined as the average of the 1/3 highest waves. This means that some individual waves could be up to twice the significant wave height!

This storm appears to be an example of a rapidly deepening “bomb” low that is often associated with some winter season storms over both the North Atlantic and North Pacific oceans. These systems are associated with what is known as a warm air seclusion where the warm surface air is lifted up during the occlusion process and then wrapped around the low center into its cold southwestern quadrant.

noaa surface analysis western pacific

932 millibars!

Gale force winds are predicted to extend from 36N to 60N, over 1,400 nautical mile wide swath of ocean.

noaa pacific surface analysis

click for larger

noaa graphic western pacific storm



Tagged with →  
Share →
  • Jack Molan

    Working in the Aleutians and Bering Sea for so many years, I refer to us as being in the bowling alley, as they toss these big fat bowling balls off the Kamchatka peninsula. Better to duck if possible!

  • fogmachine

    If that big stationary 1035H gets out of the way we’ll have some fine skiing in California next week.

  • Damn Yankee

    Years ago, while taking advanced meteo, the professor who was a retired Ocean Prediction Center meteorologist told us they weren’t allowed to print the term “bomb” on a weather map anymore because of security concerns. I would think the government could give someone reading a NOAA weather map the benefit of the doubt in this area. I’d much rather see “bomb”, telling me there is some serious #@$% coming. They also made them take the call signs off the 24 hour map because of security concerns. How am I supposed to track my friends without call signs? Funnily enough, my dad can track me just about anywhere sitting at his computer using AIS, so where’s the security in that?

  • ekk. schreiber

    I am an ex/radio officer. We had no fax, no rtty.
    We received the isobaren by telegraphy in groups
    of 5 and drawing the weather map by hand,
    Your page reminds me having sever storms on the atlantic;
    the weather pushed us back 52 miles per day.
    Thanks to all of them who make us living at sea
    a saver live.
    thanks, Ekko.

Sign up for the gCaptain Newsletter!

Over 31,000 people receive the gCaptain email newsletter every single day. Get the maritime and offshore industry headlines that matter sent straight to your inbox. Or LIKE us on Facebook!

We will not share your email address with anybody for any reason