Collision Avoidance Tip – Call his boss!

Share On Facebook Published: May 28th, 2009 by John Konrad

navy ship collision course

It’s the classic scenario from the Academy… You are the stand on vessel with no room to maneuver and a zero CPA contact is bearing down on you. You try the radio but no answer… what do you do next?

This post doesn’t answer the question but gives you other options not available when you were at the academy.

Use your AIS & VHF DSC:

  1. Head to the AIS and get the contact’s MMSI number & name
  2. Enter the number into your VHF DSC controller
  3. Select a working frequency.
  4. Hit send then start hailing on the working channel

What happens next is the GMDSS alarm will go off and his VHF will change to a working frequency. If he was away from the bridge he’ll have to return to silence the alarm at which point he hears your hail.

What if the alarm doesn’t wake him or he has it disabled?

CALL HIS BOSS

  1. Get his name from the AIS.
  2. Look him up in your ITU pub.
  3. Find his INMARSAT-B number and call him.

Why does this work? As it was explained to me “Most captains have an INMARSAT-B extension in their office, most captains spend most of their time in their office. Most of the time the captain will answer the phone and rectify the problem post-haste.” …smile

*This post comes from our extensive gCaptain Archives. To find more interesting articles from the past use the search bar or click on one of the “Tags” found in our sidebar —>


Related Posts:

Topic: Communication · Maritime Expert · Radio · Uncategorized · tips

Tags: · , , , ,

This Article Was Written By John Konrad
Captain John Konrad is co-founder of Unofficial Networks and Editor In Chief of this blog. He is a USCG licensed Master Mariner of Unlimited Tonnage and, since graduating from SUNY Maritime College, has sailed a variety of ships from ports around the world. John currently lives in Morro Bay, California with his wife and two children.

This blog is sponsored by:



RSS feed

21 Comments

2007-06-28 07:21:51

There’s never enough info in the hypothetical question.

Rule #2 (General Prudential) be right, don’t be dead right.

Avoid Extremis (Oh Shit!)

And a mess-o-rules come into play, but most folks here know, or have already forgotten them.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Fred Fry
2007-07-01 09:04:16

Actually, it is a hell of a lot easier to just alter course. This saves you the trouble of having to do so at the last minute once you realize that whatever action they do take, if any, is not enough for comfort.

Feel free to tell them on the radio that your altering course because there seems to be nobody home on their end.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Mike
2007-07-01 17:13:09

Fred, I think John works on a drillship that is often RAM while drilling for oil, so they can’t move very easily.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Bill'72
2007-07-01 17:15:10

Great tip!!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Fred Fry
2007-07-01 20:29:06

Mike,
Thanks for the clarification. That would certainly increase the need to clarify the situation.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by anon
2007-10-13 01:16:04

Another thing to try, especially if you have to deal with small craft that don’t have DSC or Inmarsat gear:

Get a good quality laser module and mount it to a pair of binoculars equipped with a siting reticle. Align everything together so the laser and siting reticle point in the same direction.

If you need to get the attention of an oncoming ship or boat that’s not responsive to radio, take your laser gear outside and illuminate the other guy’s bridge until he gets the message that there’s something in front of him.

Picking laser power is up to you. 5mW is safe under all circumstances; 50mW will get the immediate attention of anyone with functioning eyes and 500mW properly placed will put enough power through the eyelids to wake up a sleeping watch stander.

Note: don’t try this against warships or aircraft.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by John
2007-10-13 01:31:34

Interesting… thanks for the tip anon. -John

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by OneEighteen
2007-12-18 21:33:52

I agree with Fred above. As long as you’re not an anchored drill ship, just alter course while the guy is still over a mile away. I always figure the rules of the road are for assigning blame after a collision. Use common sense to avoid collisions.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by John
2007-12-20 08:31:39

I like the “common sense” advice. The sign by my desk reads “Guys, this isn’t rocket science or I wouldn’t be here”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by OneEighteen
2007-12-24 17:10:22

Why do you think this advice was for mates?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by CaptStash
2007-12-24 17:44:16

If you have done all of the above, you are probably already in big trouble.

I often ask this or similar questions when training new mates. The right answer is: Call the Captain! The mate on watch shouldn’t be waiting until it’s too late before he calls the captain. This is why we get paid the big bucks anyway. If you have called the opther ship after getting his name off the AIS and not had any luck, the CPA is small, and the time of CPS is under 20 minutes, it’s time to get the boss up there post haste.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by CaptStash
2007-12-24 19:00:26

Perhaps I jumped to a conclusion. But also, I have to say that by the time you fooled around and made the phone call you would likely be in extremis. Often, other ships don’t respond if they are a ways away yet. I dont’t know why, they just don’t.

I try to teaach my mates common sense. Mid ocean, it’s often safer and easier to make a small course correction when it becomes clear that the other ship is not doing what is supposed to.

And most importantly — Never, ever turn left! (Leave that one to the captain, and let me tell you, I sure haven’t done it very many times).

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Anshuman Naik
2008-02-04 01:17:36

PS – The use of the vhf for collision avoidance is always controversial because of the foll. issues -

a) Loss of time (conveying your info to the other vessel and discussion) wen someone should be taking action

b) Communication issues (all navigators do not have English as a mother tongue, different accents …. a London cockney may not understand an American… ditto vice versa)

c) Loss of situational awareness because of (1) … can you monitor the ARPA when o the vhf?

d) a possibility that someone may do things different from the ROR

I agree … for RAM Drill ships this may be an option, but not for regular merchant vessels .. .imagine being in Taiwan straits with collision situations continuously developing every few minutes – daily scenario.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by cetaceous
2009-05-29 08:17:55

I have had this happen a few times and managed to get in contact with the other (FOC, third-world) vessel and found the officer and later the capt unwilling to comply with the COLREGS. Their arguments are either that I am the more maneuverable vessel (RO-PAX) or that the alteration that I have to make to avoid collision is smaller than the alteration they would have to make. When I've insisted that they comply with the COLREGS they get quite angry and tend to stand on. In cases where I have had the sea room I've had to do a round-turn to stbd when range was about 2 to 3 miles,other times I've reduced speed to increase the CPA. Each time I've have had the master come to the bridge and observe my actions to make sure I'm in the clear.
The first time this happened to me we used the MER to play back the incident to the local port-state authorities in the hope that they would reprimand the other vessel at their next port of call, instead my competence and that of my capt was questioned because of my use of VHF in collision avoidance. So now I tend to play along with these recalcitrant, incompetent officers and avoid the situation long before it becomes and issue and alter course, albeit relatively subtly, at 15 to 20nm and avoid contacting them at all. I'm not happy about it in the slightest but I feel that I now have more responsibility with PAX on board and can't go trying to make a point by escalating the situation as I may have done in the past on a bulk carrier.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by m scease
2009-05-30 05:21:57

Fine picture of a Bob Hope class, make way I'm coming through. Personally, I like the previous posters comment. Better to make room gracefully, than an issue. Don't know about the anchored drill rig ship issues, but they would seem to be in the same lighthouse catagory as one of the gcapt' earlier posts exemplified.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.