Join our crew and become one of the 105,896 members that receive our newsletter.

U.S. Court Dismisses Hawaii Jones Act Claims

U.S. Court Dismisses Hawaii Jones Act Claims

GCaptain
Total Views: 48
April 30, 2013

A Matson containership. Photo: Matson

A federal court in Hawaii has dismissed a lawsuit challenging the effectiveness of the Jones Act in the state. 

Plaintiffs Patrick Novak, Daniel Rocha, Larry Kenner, Ken Schoolland, Bjorn Arntzen, Philip R. Wilkerson, and William Akina, Ph.D, collectively filed the complaint in November 2012 seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as monetary damages, in connection with the U.S. government’s enforcement of the Jones Act in Hawaii. The plaintiff’s argued that the enforcement of the Jones Act, as applied in the State of Hawaii, is an unlawful restraint of interstate trade and subsequently raises costs to consumers.

The court, however, determined that the plaintiff’s merely assert a generalized disagreement with the Jones Act and unsubstantiated claims of economic harm allegedly caused by it, and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

The cases dismissal is the latest victory for the Jones Act. In March, the U.S. Government Accountability Office released a report disproving shippers’ claims that the Jones Act raises prices for consumers in Puerto Rico.

Full Case: PATRICK NOVAK; DANIEL ROCHA; LARRY KENNER, dba KENNER, INC., a Hawai`i corporation; KEN SCHOOLLAND; BJORN ARNTZEN; PHILIP R. WILKERSON; and WILLIAM AKINA, Ph.D. vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

Unlock Exclusive Insights Today!

Join the gCaptain Club for curated content, insider opinions, and vibrant community discussions.

Sign Up
Back to Main
polygon icon polygon icon

Why Join the gCaptain Club?

Access exclusive insights, engage in vibrant discussions, and gain perspectives from our CEO.

Sign Up
close

JOIN OUR CREW

Maritime and offshore news trusted by our 105,896 members delivered daily straight to your inbox.

Join Our Crew

Join the 105,896 members that receive our newsletter.