gCaptain.com

A Blog About Ships

Fastream Offshore Leaderboard



Sea Stories - Training At Sea

February 14th, 2008 · Comments - by John -

Print This Post Print This Post Email Subscription Button Send To Friend

West Marine 468

Training at Sea

by Jeffrey Musk

A few months ago I returned to my rotary job onboard a Roll on/Roll off in the Pacific Ocean. Along with the familiar faces of the crew I had been working with for several years was the even more familiar face of my younger brother. He had just finished the first phase of his training program at the Harry Lundeberg School of Seamanship. As it happened, my ship was sailing foreign the same day that he was to be assigned to his first vessel. He had the good luck to talk to the placement officer at the school and was sent to my ship as soon as he had said that he had a brother who was an officer in the Merchant Marine.

As an apprentice his time would be split evenly between the deck, engine, and stewards department. While working with the deck department he would take his job assignments from the Boson and work alongside the unlicensed crew. To assure that he received ample hands on training beyond needle gunning and cleaning holds, I arranged a training schedule to have each of the two Ordinary Seamen and the Apprentice come to the bridge on a rotating schedule during my watch with the Captain’s permission.

This on the job training was not mandatory for the novice crew, but my brother was eager to learn as much about standing a watch and steering as he could. I strongly encouraged the ordinaries as well. They were more than happy to spend an hour on the bridge once or twice a week and still get their overtime.

First up was one of the ordinaries. English was a second language for him so I went slow being sure he retained what we discussed. We first covered the basics of how a lookout reports objects and how the compass repeaters functioned. Then I began to explain the mechanics of how the ship’s course was controlled. Each time I mentioned the rudder I would find a quizzical look on the ordinaries face.

After some questioning I was surprised to learn that this particular mariner, whom had been at sea for nearly a decade, had never understood how a ship’s heading was changed.

This bothered me for two reasons. First as a hard working ordinary seaman, I felt that he would naturally take an interest in learning anything new about the way a ship worked. Secondly, his lack of knowledge was probably perceived on other ships as a lack of intelligence and this perception likely hindered any encouragement for him to move up the hawse pipe. Fortunately I had a folder of shipyard photos on the bridge computer so we looked at those before going any further.

It was almost an identical situation for the second ordinary. He too spoke English as a second language and was fluent, but when it came to the basic mechanics of ship construction, rudder and propeller interaction for example, he was completely at a loss.

With my brother on the bridge we moved a little quicker. He had handled small boats all his life, but we still covered every aspect of standing an efficient bridge watch. I also made sure that he had as much helm time as his work schedule would allow. I felt compelled to ensure that he would be prepared for his next ship and that his reputation would not be tarnished by any lack of seafaring knowledge that was expected from an ordinary seaman.

His training was not only limited when working with the deck department. During his 30 days in the engine department he was exposed to the hot and loud world of engineering. Of course he was often used as a spare hand to run for tools or oil absorbents, or as a wiper to keep the decks and machinery cleaned, but the engineers onboard still made sure that he was familiar with the major equipment and tools. Even when working with the steward’s department he learned how much work was involved in keeping 21 souls fed.

It is too often that I encounter ordinaries, apprentices, and cadets who have sailed on ships where there was little or no direct training provided onboard. In the hectic daily grind the most important part of their maritime education is being overlooked.

I feel that this has a detrimental affect on entrance level mariners in the Merchant Marine workforce. If these sailors are not shown that it is imperative to ask questions and are not encouraged to learn about the ship they work and live on, than their development is hindered. Instead of being an asset to the vessel, they just continue to be a fly on the wall and an idle spare hand, often learning from their mistakes the right way to do something rather than being shown the proper way first.

In the case of my brother, onboard training was an essential component of his vocational education at the Piney Point. Like any cadet’s sea project, it was built right in to his, but it wasn’t enough just to fill in the answers and spend the minimum amount of time on the helm. Having an officer, or another AB, or a boson take an active role in teaching him expanded his knowledge well beyond what his sea project demanded. In the case of the two ordinary seamen fire and boat drills constituted the majority of their formal training in years.

Having my own sibling onboard definitely reinforced the importance of teaching my subordinates. In an emergency I have to trust my life to them, whether in fighting a fire or releasing gripes on a lifeboat. Expecting entry-level mariners to understand their ship and the duties that will sooner or later be their own is paramount in retaining skilled personnel at sea.

__________
Jeff Musk has been a sailing on merchant vessels since 2004 working on coastal tankers and most recently a commercial roll on/roll off.



About The Author

Captain John Konrad is co-founder of Unofficial Networks and Editor In Chief of this blog. He is a USCG licensed Master Mariner of Unlimited Tonnage and, since graduating from SUNY Maritime College, has sailed a variety of ships from ports around the world. He currently lives in Morro Bay, California with his wife and two children.
Full Profile: John
Enjoy this story? Subscribe to or feed Email Subscription Button OR Send to friend Email Subscription Button

Related Posts




Email Button Facebook Button Google Button Twitter Button Stumbleupon Button Bookmark and Share

Categories: Sea Stories · Training

Tags: · , ,

-





Viewing 9 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    John. I am surprised on the Piney Point program. I get the monthly newletter and it is full of graduation stuff. However while at APL as Ass't Marine Supt a C10 skipper said his CMA 3rd mate did not know how to steer.
    • ^
    • v
    John, I started out 45 yrs ago on tankers as a training O.S. and did my time there until I was tested for O.S. & later as an A.B. on cargo ships. During this time I kept learning the art of seamenship from others, as well as teaching myself to do better. Some years later having sailed Nationally and Internationally I decided to write for my third mate's license . Having obtained this I never stopped there and now hold a Master Mariner's Certificate/License.

    Today as a ship's master I have come to see the good, fair, poor, and "God, what the hell is he or she doing here aboard this ship". Yes, the art of seamenship is a dying art that does not only affect unlicensed seamen. It affects some of the deck and engineering officer's that I have come across during my career at sea. These mariner's I am speaking about are not just what you see Nationally, but Internationally as well makes me wonder who let these people get on board the ships. (The Company & Manning Agencies)

    When it comes to working with these good folks, you are told by the company that you are not here to re-invent the word "seamenship". Just work with what we give you !! My response to this type of comment is. " What happens if something horribly goes wrong while having to put up with someone that does not know the first thing about loading stresses. Or causes a major marine incident that ends up costing the company and the P&I Club one hell of a lot of money, not to mention Corporate Reputation". All because of the lack of experience that some mariner's should have gained over the course of time, or the shore side hiring practices used.

    Comments most generally made by the company should this happen is; "Well Captain you should have know better than to give them that job " !!

    To complain about these in-experienced officer's or crew (deck or engine) not being able to do the work assigned to them. If you say anything then you put your own job/position on the line. Very few companies or agencies will never accept their own short comings, when placing crew's on board. Therefore it is always the Captains fault, or so it seems.

    The important thing to remember here is that there's some who are prepared to learn regardless. While there are others that think that they know more then you!! Then there are those that are here only for a pay cheque and don't mind it if you know it or not. So if the Company or the Agencies that hired them don't care, then why should you care !!

    As a professional l mariner spanning a period of 45 years at sea, I still or do care and it is sad to see it come to this !!

    Captain Derek C. Kruger
    Master Mariner
    • ^
    • v
    Capt. Kruger, I received this reply via email from Captain John Denham;


    Unfortunately I understand exactly what you are concerned about. With a similar background I expected bigger and better things as I rose from bunk room to the pilot house and quit chipping paint and started plotting star sights. My tutors the 6-8 Masters of yester- years told me of their life at sea. The conditions were bad and most crews except for a few were equally bad. My only solution was to set an example and make sure I was knowledgeable in my reports. If I was the problem I would rather hear it from the crew than the boss. Management has a different view of those at sea. As Assistant Marine Superintendent I could only listen to the captains and mates and then scheme how I could help their cause. The door always opens when something bad happens, just make sure you are not caught on the outside when it closes. Stupid people do dumb things, but the smarter they get the more complicated their errors become. Until I was captain and totally responsible I had no idea how little authority I actually had. I learned that authority could not do it alone. I took it upon myself to became a listener, teacher and example and hoped that some crew members realized that as capatin I was also part of the crew. I never succeeded with everyone, but I did get a number of conversions and survived three ships as captain and team leader. It was my way to survive and still keep being paid. Derek, at 82 I wake almost every night remembering a situation I handled poorly and now I see clearly, how I could have handled it better.
    Regards,
    John
    • ^
    • v
    Would someone mind commenting on the benefit (or assumed one) of attending a maritime school as opposed to entering the field as an ordinary seaman? I have been told that those who enter maritime service from an academy or trade school are the least desirable in hiring for the very reasons that you give above. I am 36 years old and I desire to go to sea. I have a masters degree in meteorology, and I aspire to work as a deck officer some day. I am hearing two very different points of view, one from schools and one from friends who have worked in the industry. What route would you suggest to me.

    Thanks,

    Eric
    • ^
    • v
    Eric: Each process has its benefits. Some schools are better than others and each has its alumni association ; that is beneficial. If I were you, I would write to each school and tell them what you want to do...don’t mention why because they are not interested, besides they are not hiring you. Basically they want your money.

    Regardless of route to the bridge, it is up to the individual. I am a mixture of both routes and feel my few achievements were because I was available at the right time and was qualified; later, experience helped. Education today is more important than in the past because the industry is geared to electronics and automation. At 36 years of age, I don’t think you’d be happy in a college unless you had a role, other than just a student. That is a possibility. See what offers you get from academia.

    There are many opportunities to get started. Pick up copies of Maritime Reporter, Pacific Maritime Magazine, or Marine News they have all kinds of jobs etc. Piney Point, Maryland is an excellent union operated school and produces a good product. On the internet try “Maritime Jobs.com” there are jobs today.

    Again if were you I would start by getting a job with MSTS (Navy) or some non union employer and try the business for a test period. You may not like it. The glamour is mostly gone; conditions are good, but the work is either hard or boring. Cruise lines are hiring constantly. You’ll need to get seaman’s papers and that alone may discourage you. Lastly you can hang around the waterfront and ask questions maybe some one will feel sorry for you and give you some better advice. And, if you still want to go to sea, don’t give up, the opportunity is there if you persevere. JGD

    —thye ar4e not hiringuas e theyare not interested.ou wanto .The answer to your query is up to you. There are factors that one should consider and decisions one must make. At age 36, you are probably too old to be accepted for enrollment in a state or federal maritime school. But that does not mean you should write to each one and shop. Nor does that mean I recommend a school. First academies provide a type of education that academically prepares one to pass the license exams and provide an encounter with most factions of the business. The comradeship is outstanding and its connections are cherished and can be enjoyed for years. As a undergraduate, you of course acquire a college education; even the C students are smarter than most. But in you case, wasted.

    On the other hand with your background one can apply for a job with MSTS for example pr go to Piney Point and pick up the basics and apply yourself at sea for several years and see if this is what you really want to do. If you are married then you have an additional problem trying to keep a marriage alive. Life at sea is not difficult except when you are not busy. A god student can pass the time in study and practicing new skills, but that precludes being one of the guys and be sociable.
    • ^
    • v
    Excuse me---disregard the last part, it was an earlier draft. JGD
    • ^
    • v
    A friend of mine wanted to go to sea, and he's now enrolled in PMI's 2 year entry level to mate program. He's getting a heck of a lot more experience and training (classroom and onboard) than I ever did coming up through the hawse, and it sounds like in a couple years he'll have a sweet job with the company that is sponsoring him. Not a bad way to get started as a new guy.
    • ^
    • v
    Merchant mariner training. There are two concepts (1) teach the subject (2) teach the exam. If you can't pass the exam the knowledge is of little use. Employers look at the license and endorsements and hope the ticketee has skill; that is one reason why there is so many complaints about cadets. Regardless of the concept, it is the teacher that makes the course. An experienced mariner teaching a subject he knows will in most cases produce a good student, if the student wants to learn. Aboard ship, there is no other alternative; no place to go and litttle else to occupy ones' mind. Several of my shipmates could recite the Rules of the Road verbatim but did not have clue as to what they meant. Company cadets were probably the best trained depending on the tutors. The ATS in WW11 had an excellent program but no teachers. USMOS produced some of the best mariners-officers because they were qualified motivated seaman before they entered the program and all teachers were professionals.
    • ^
    • v
    Thank you all so much for your responses. I suppose, as often is the case, that it is not surprising that there are no simple answers.

    Based on your responses, I will investigate PMI.

    One point that has me a bit unsettled is the idea that the "glamor" of sea life is no more. I admit that all jobs have negative sides. Has automation really taken the attraction away from sea life? Tugs and service vessels seem to be areas where there might be daily challenges that keep the job interesting. Am I mistaken here? I suspect that the more interaction one has with land and other vessels, the more interesting the work, as opposed to long voyages on autopilot. If any of you were entering the workforce now, which area would you enter for the greatest satisfaction and enjoyment?

    By the way, I am an insulin dependent diabetic, so any military related employment is out. I just received my MMD, so at least that hurdle is out of the way.

    Again, I truly appreciate your thoughts.

    Eric

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus
 


Comments


Popular Topics



Sponsors



Maritime and Offshore Recruitment

Spurs

Mariner Taxes Logo

Mariner Taxes



The New Hawsepipe


The Maritime Executive Magazine








Your Ad Here




Authors



Follow Us



Categories



Recent Posts



Popular

Shipping Archives

Read A Random Story