An internal investigation by Transocean Ltd. determined that a series of risky decisions made mostly by BP PLC led to the Deepwater Horizon oil-spill disaster, contrasting with earlier U.S. government reports that put a large share of the blame on the Switzerland-based offshore-drilling contractor.
The decisions in the two weeks leading up to the incident were made because BP worried that it was running out of time, according to the Transocean investigation, released Wednesday. The U.K. oil company was concerned that the high-pressure injections of mud and cement needed to keep the deep-water well sealed would end up fracturing the rock formation that held the oil in the reservoir, endangering future exploitation of the new discovery, the Transocean report said.
BP couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.
Transocean owned the doomed Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, which was drilling BP’s Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico. In April 2010, the rig exploded and sank, killing 11 and touching off the worst marine oil spill in U.S. history. The well spewed 4.9 million barrels of crude oil before it was sealed.
The results of the Transocean probe are part of an continuing legal saga, in which BP and the U.S. government have also produced lengthy reports. An investigation by the White House blamed BP, as well as Transocean and Halliburton Co., the company in charge of cementing the well shut. That report criticized Transocean for failing to communicate to its crew lessons from an earlier near-miss in the North Sea that was “eerily similar” to the Gulf of Mexico blowout.
In April, an investigation by the U.S. Coast Guard offered a damning critique of Transocean, saying improper maintenance, insufficient staff training and badly designed safety systems contributed to the deadly explosion. The company had disputed the report, and claimed documentary evidence in the Coast Guard’s possession refuted key findings in their report.
The U.S. Department of the Interior and the Coast Guard are scheduled to issue a final report on the incident by late July at the latest.
Analysts with Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co., an energy research firm in Houston, said the Transocean report was “no surprise.” In a note, the analysts said: “Liability is ultimately going to be decided by the courts.”
According to its probe, Transocean said well design, construction and temporary-abandonment decisions, many made by BP in the two weeks leading up to the incident, compounded the likelihood of failure.
In addition, Transocean said Halliburton and BP didn’t adequately test the cement-slurry program, despite risks associated with the design.
Halliburton, one of the world’s largest oilfield-service providers, said in a statement it remains confident that all the work it performed in the Macondo well “was completed in accordance with BP’s specifications for its well construction plan and instructions,” and that its contract protects it from liability.
“Deepwater operations are inherently complex and a number of contractors are involved which routinely make recommendations to a single point of contact, the well owner,” the company said.
Transocean acknowledged that all the parties involved in the drilling of the Macondo well misinterpreted the results of a negative pressure test that indicated there was coming trouble. But “the responsibility remains with BP,” which, being the operator of the well, called the shots aboard the rig, Bill Ambrose, manager of Transocean’s North American division, said during a conference call.
Transocean also reiterated that the blowout preventer it placed at the top of the well—and which failed to prevent the blowout—was properly maintained and operated. The blowout preventer failed because the extreme pressure coming up from the well made the drill pipe bow within the device, a finding made by independent agency Det Norske Veritas and that was included in a previous U.S. government report.
The Department of the Interior has announced a new rule aiming to ensure that costs related to the decommissioning of offshore platforms are covered by the oil and gas industry,...
(Bloomberg) — For a company that made its name with frontier oil discoveries from Iran to Alaska, BP Plc is notably absent from today’s hottest new oil plays. The company’s...
Virginia-based energy company Dominion Energy has announced the launch of the first U.S.-built and Jones Act-compliant offshore wind turbine installation vessel, the Charybdis. A 472-foot vessel is being built at the...
April 15, 2024
Total Views: 2809
Why Join the gCaptain Club?
Access exclusive insights, engage in vibrant discussions, and gain perspectives from our CEO.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.