EUNAVFOR warship escorts a containership in the Red Sea as part of the EU's Operation ASPIDES

EUNAVFOR warship escorts a CMA CGM containership in the Red Sea as part of the EU's Operation ASPIDES. Photo courtesy EUNAVFOR

Red Sea Corridor Slips Back Into Crisis as Houthi Threats Resurface

Mike Schuler
Total Views: 0
March 2, 2026

The brief reprieve in Red Sea shipping attacks ended this weekend as Yemen’s Houthi movement signaled an imminent return to targeting commercial vessels, casting a shadow over what had been a fragile recovery in one of the world’s most critical maritime corridors.

Two senior Houthi officials told international media that the group has decided to restart missile and drone operations against maritime traffic in response to US-Israeli military strikes on Iran. The officials indicated that renewed attacks could begin immediately and would target the same shipping routes struck during the group’s 2024-2025 campaign in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden.

The timing represents a sharp reversal. The Houthis had effectively paused large-scale maritime attacks in mid-November 2025 following a regional de-escalation linked to a Gaza ceasefire. From approximately November 11, 2025 until late February 2026, there were no sustained, confirmed missile or drone attacks against merchant vessels attributable to the group. This weekend’s statements therefore mark the end of roughly three and a half months of relative calm.

The Baltic and International Maritime Council (BIMCO), the world’s largest international shipping association, warned that vessels with business links to US or Israeli interests are likely to face elevated risk if Houthi attacks resume. But BIMCO Chief Safety & Security Officer Jakob Larsen cautioned that the threat extends beyond direct affiliations.

“Ships with business connections to US or Israeli interests are more likely to be targeted, but other ships may also be targeted deliberately or in error,” Larsen stated. In past attack cycles, ships with no clear Israeli or American ties were struck, either deliberately or through misidentification.

The warning comes as major container carriers were already reversing course on their tentative return to the Red Sea. Last week, less than a month after restarting limited Red Sea transits and days before U.S.-Israel strikes on Iran, Danish carrier Maersk announced it was once again rerouting select services around the Cape of Good Hope, citing “unforeseen constraints arising from the wider operating environment in the Red Sea region” as creating delay risks.

According to vessel schedules, the westbound Maersk Houston and Astrid Maersk will route via Cape of Good Hope when departing Salalah on March 5 and March 12, respectively. The decision marks a significant setback for what had appeared to be a cautious but promising reopening.

Maersk and partner Hapag-Lloyd had announced the first structural return of their Gemini Cooperation’s ME11 service to the Red Sea in early February, with westbound sailings resuming on February 4 and eastbound transits beginning February 3. The operational benefits remained compelling—westbound ME11 sailings save 19 days via Suez, while eastbound voyages are seven days shorter.

But the repeated reversals threaten something perhaps more valuable than time: predictability. As Xeneta senior analyst Destine Ozuygur warned when CMA CGM abruptly rerouted services back around the Cape in late January, “Unpredictability is toxic for supply chains”.

Maersk reported a $153 million loss in its Ocean division for Q4 2025, marking its first quarterly loss in years as it navigates the difficult transition between Cape diversions and Suez transits. The company issued wide 2026 guidance ranging from a $1.5 billion loss to a $1.0 billion profit, reflecting deep uncertainty around the pace of any sustained Red Sea reopening.

Insurance implications are expected to follow rapidly. BIMCO stated that war risk premiums are likely to increase sharply if attacks resume. During previous Houthi campaigns, additional war risk premiums for Red Sea transits rose significantly, in some cases adding hundreds of thousands of dollars to individual voyages.

“We expect insurance rates to increase manyfold, and ships with business connections to US or Israel approaching the area are probably not going to be able to get insurance,” Larsen said.

The Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb Strait remain critical arteries for global trade, linking European and Mediterranean markets with Asia via the Suez Canal. Roughly 10-15% of global seaborne trade transits the corridor in normal conditions. During the previous Houthi campaign, major container lines and tanker operators rerouted vessels around southern Africa, adding approximately 10-14 days to voyages and significantly increasing fuel costs and emissions.

The Red Sea crisis began on November 19, 2023, when Houthi forces seized the Galaxy Leader off Yemen. More than 100 merchant vessels have since been targeted, with four ships sunk, one seized, and at least eight seafarers killed. Before the attacks, the Suez Canal processed roughly 80 containerships per week; by mid-January 2026, that figure had recovered to just 26.

As of Monday, no confirmed new maritime strike had yet been independently verified in connection with the latest Houthi statements. However, naval and commercial operators across the region have elevated threat levels and activated contingency protocols.

The immediate outlook depends on whether the Houthis transition from rhetoric to sustained operational action. Should attacks resume, shipowners face renewed decisions over routing, charter performance, war risk cover and crew safety. Freight markets are also likely to react quickly if confirmed strikes occur.

For now, the situation remains fluid but grounded in verifiable developments: confirmed US-Israeli military action against Iran; credible Houthi signaling of resumed maritime attacks; formal security advisories from UKMTO; and industry warnings from BIMCO regarding targeting patterns and insurance escalation. The combination restores the Red Sea and Gulf region to a high-risk maritime theatre, with implications that extend well beyond regional waters.

Editorial Standards · Corrections · About gCaptain

Back to Main