SAO PAULO, Feb 19 (Reuters) – Brazilian dock workers in Santos on Tuesday left a Chinese ship they occupied for two days in protest against a government port modernization drive they fear will cost them jobs and cut wages.
About 60 stevedores boarded the Zhen Hua 10 early on Monday, stopping it from unloading cranes manufactured by the Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industry Co. The cranes will be installed at Embraport, a new $1.2 billion private container terminal in Santos that does not use established union procedures to hire workers.
Although the protest was brief with no perceived impact on Santos port, it gave a taste of what is likely to come as unions gear up to resist a sweeping reform of port regulations.
The government says the changes are imperative to boost efficiency for its world-leading commodity export sector.
Embraport said in a statement that workers left the ship after the terminal agreed to contract unionized workers to watch over the unloading and assembly of the cranes to be carried out by representatives of the Chinese manufacturer.
Embraport denied allegations by unions that it was contracting Chinese workers as substitute dock workers and said the unloading and assembly of the equipment by the manufacturer was pre-established in the purchase contract.
Union officials say the fight over the right to work the terminals in Santos, Brazil’s biggest port by value of goods moved, is likely to intensify as the government rolls out reforms of the 1993 Ports Law in the coming weeks.
“Matters are going to worsen at the ports,” said Paulo Pereira da Silva, a congressman and President of the umbrella union Forca Sindical told Reuters.
“Santos workers will strike for six hours on Friday, stevedores voted to hold a nationwide strike soon and port unions across Brazil voted to strike around mid-March …” he said.
Twenty years ago, Brazil opened the door to private investment in its terminals, although much of the infrastructure at the country’s ports remains in state hands. But private and public terminals at Brazilian ports are still required to source workers through a centralized agency called the OGMO that doles out available shifts to union members.
Embraport, owned by local chemical and infrastructure group Odebrecht, trading company Coimex and the United Arab Emirates’ DP World, is one of the first private terminals here not required to contract labor through the OGMO.
And unless President Dilma Rousseff or Congress modifies Decree 595 outlining port regulation reforms, the government could auction off 159 terminals to private investors who would also be free to ignore the OGMO and hire their own labor.
“I’m afraid this will end up in the courts,” said Paulo Fleury, a director at the Logistics and Supply Chain Institute (Ilos). “And it will be the exporters and shippers caught in the crossfire between the unions, government and current terminal concession holders.”
Fleury said it would be disastrous for existing terminal concession holders, who will still be obliged to use the OGMO “if the government allows competing terminals to set up next door with a completely different cost structure.”
Shipments of grain, sugar and coffee from Brazil might be in for a rough ride during strikes and protests that unions are planning for the coming weeks. Interruptions in the flow of these basic commodities could affect futures prices, especially for crops whose yields have been hit by drought in North and South America.
Brazil’s grain belt is in the midst of a record harvest of 83 million tonnes of soybeans and 74 million tonnes of corn. Exporters have already dispatched scores of ships to load and carry the crops away from local ports in the coming months.
As the world’s population expands, Brazil will be one of the 21st century’s most important exporters of food due to its abundant arable land, water and sun.
The government plans to attract $27 billion in private sector investment in the next few years to modernize Brazil’s underdeveloped ports.
President Rousseff has pushed forward the reforms as part of an infrastructure package she hopes will help bring down what is often referred to as the “Brazil Cost.” She expects to lower the cost of moving goods through ports by 20 percent. ($1 = 1.9567 Brazilian reals) (Additional reporting by Roberto Samora and Peter Murphy; Editing by David Gregorio and Andre Grenon)
By Julian Lee (Bloomberg) Moscow’s use of the tankers sanctioned for their involvement in the Russian oil trade is accelerating, with close to one-third of the blacklisted vessels back at work....
By Gautam Naik (Bloomberg) After fearing the worst from Hurricane Milton, investors in catastrophe bonds appear to have sustained losses well below those predicted as recently as Wednesday. Estimates that had...
As Hurricane Milton barrels toward Florida’s west coast, the maritime community braces for a devastating blow. Maritime historian Sal Mercogliano‘s latest episode of What’s Going on With Shipping? outlines the unfolding crisis,...
October 9, 2024
Total Views: 1541
Why Join the gCaptain Club?
Access exclusive insights, engage in vibrant discussions, and gain perspectives from our CEO.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.