French shipping giant CMA CGM says it will suspend calls at the Port of Savannah on the U.S. East Coast due to severe congestion and long wait times. The announcement comes a day after German liner Hapag-Lloyd said it will also be omitting the Savanah call from its India America Express service.
The CMA CGM suspension applies to its AMERIGO service connecting the Western Mediterranean with the USEC. The company says the temporary suspension is due to congestion with wait times of up to 8 to 10 days.
A new call will be added to the Port of Charleston, in South Carolina, which will receive shipments bound for Savannah. The first sailing impacted will be the MV CMA CGM La Traviata, on voyage 0MR9TW1MA, which has an ETA in Algeciras on October 31 followed by Charleston on November 27. The diverted vessels will call at Charleston’s Wando Welch Terminal (WWT) on Saturdays, mirroring the current Savannah berth window.
Congestion at the Port of Savannah has become among the worst on the U.S. East Coast with more than 30 ships at anchorage and wait times upwards of 7 days as of mid-September. In an operations update in late last month, Maersk Line said the situation in Savannah had become “increasingly challenging.”
On Tuesday, Hapag-Lloyd announced changes to its India America Express service, connecting the Indian Subcontinent with the East Coast of North America, which will included omitting its Savannah call from week 42 to week 47.
To help relieve some of the congestion, Georgia Ports Authority Board in September approved more than $34 million to help expedite the addition of 1.6 million TEU capacity now scheduled to come online in December. The funds come on the heels of second busiest month in the Savannah’s history in August thanks to the pandemic-fueled imports boom.
To the north, South Carolina Ports reported record monthly throughput in September across Port of Charleston’s three container terminals, with 205,008 TEUs representing a 5% increase year-over-year. SC Ports in March opened phase one of its new Hugh K. Leatherman Terminal (HLT), adding 700,000 TEUs of annual throughput capacity and an additional berth to the East Coast market. However, a labor dispute between International Longshoremen’s Association and certain container carriers has left the terminal largely unused, with SC Ports’ website showing only three vessel arrivals scheduled between now and the end of the month.
March witnessed an upswing in trade at the Port of Long Beach, marking the seventh month in a row of year-over-year cargo growth. Last month, dockworkers and terminal operators handled...
Europe’s busiest port, the Port of Rotterdam, saw a decline of 1.4% in its total throughput in the first quarter of 2024 compared to last year. In total, the port...
Colonel’s Island Terminal at the Port of Brunswick in Georgia has set a new record in March, handling 77,236 units of Roll-on/Roll-off (Ro/Ro) cargo. This figure represents a 21 percent...
April 18, 2024
Total Views: 548
Why Join the gCaptain Club?
Access exclusive insights, engage in vibrant discussions, and gain perspectives from our CEO.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.