Comments on: MARAD Revisits The Use of Double Hull Tankers? http://gcaptain.com/marad-revisiting-double-hull-tankers/ Sun, 19 May 2013 17:16:25 +0000 hourly 1 By: Robert H. Bolling http://gcaptain.com/marad-revisiting-double-hull-tankers/#comment-32821 Robert H. Bolling Thu, 09 Aug 2012 12:57:34 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=52549#comment-32821 "Tules that are being proposed"?

"SWO (Statement of Work)"?

]]> By: Robert Fletcher http://gcaptain.com/marad-revisiting-double-hull-tankers/#comment-32818 Robert Fletcher Thu, 09 Aug 2012 07:55:55 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=52549#comment-32818 Which lucky senator owns the company "chosen" to do the study?

]]> By: Ole Toudal Pedersen http://gcaptain.com/marad-revisiting-double-hull-tankers/#comment-32817 Ole Toudal Pedersen Thu, 09 Aug 2012 01:32:57 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=52549#comment-32817 You can find the book here:
http://www.c4tx.org/ctx/pub/tromedy2.pdf

]]> By: Ole Toudal Pedersen http://gcaptain.com/marad-revisiting-double-hull-tankers/#comment-32816 Ole Toudal Pedersen Thu, 09 Aug 2012 01:32:21 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=52549#comment-32816 Try reading 'The Tankship Tromedy'. It will give you a load of reasons why double hull tankers sucks and why the classification system as we know it now sucks.

]]> By: Scott Edward Joisce http://gcaptain.com/marad-revisiting-double-hull-tankers/#comment-32815 Scott Edward Joisce Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:44:47 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=52549#comment-32815 What about the carbon footprint involved in this useless study! Move On USA, Exxon is still being paid for….

]]> By: David Stilson http://gcaptain.com/marad-revisiting-double-hull-tankers/#comment-32814 David Stilson Wed, 08 Aug 2012 21:43:39 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=52549#comment-32814 Seriously

]]>