by John Konrad (gCaptain) You maybe confused by this headline but so are we. USS Freedom (LCS 1), the lead ship of the Freedom-variant Littoral Combat Ship, recognized little more than a decade of naval service during a decommissioning ceremony at Naval Base San Diego this week. It was “envisioned to be a networked, agile, stealthy surface combatant” but most naval experts agree the program was an expensive failure.
Depite the monumental failure of the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) platform – which naval experts have called “A Beautiful Disaster” – the US Navy is constructing 10 more LCS ships right now and have an additional one of these failed platform on order.
Because of the many failures in the program the USS Freedom has served mostly as a test and training ship. According to the US Navy the decommissioning of LCS 1 “supports department-wide business process reform initiatives to free up time, resources, and manpower in support of increased lethality” but most experts cite the true problems as huge cost overruns, mechanical problems, and changing geopolitical trends made this relatively new ship obsolete.
“I just wanted to point out the fact that, you know, we’ve had class after class after class of ship procurement and construction that has essentially failed. And it’s failed us in providing national defense, presence, deterrence overseas,” Congresswoman Luria said during a Congressional hearing in February 2020. “And it’s failed the sailors who are working on those ships. They’re the ones who are doing the right thing, but we’re giving them platforms that can’t do the job, that are not fully developed, that are not mature in design before we start building them.”
Of the four original Feedom Class LCS ships the USS Independence has never deployed and served as a test platform, Freedom recently deployed to U.S. Southern Command. Fort Worth and Coronado have each deployed once, but both experienced technical issues that forced expensive repairs during their deployments. In May, Admiral Gilday, Chief Of Naval Operations, said it would cost approximately $2.5 billion to upgrade the first four hulls of the Freedom Class LCS to prepare them for combat. So instead, he is decommissioning them.
More Failed Ships On Order
What is most shocking about this story is not the utter failure of the LCS platform, nor it’s immense costs. Most shocking is the fact the Navy is still building more. In 2019 the U.S. Navy announced it awarded contracts for another three Littoral Combat Ships, bringing the total number of vessels ordered so far to over 30. Austal received two of the awards while Lockheed Martin received the third.
Two LCS ships were comissioned this year, The USS Oakland in April 2021 and the USS Mobile in May 2021. The USS Minneapolis-Saint Paul, built by Fincantieri Marinette Marine, was also scheduled to be comissioned this year but a problem with the propulsion system was discovered. The Navy did not provide a timeline for when she is expected to be commissioned or go into service. The USS Marinette, also built by Fincantieri Marinette Marine, was launched in 2020 but still has not been comissioned.
Plus the USS Navy has once more LCS on order that has been authorized but is not yet under construction, the LCS Pierre.
“Failure this comprehensive is incredible, even for our broken defense procurement system,” said the late Senator McCain way back in 2014, years before the Navy ordered even more LCS ships. “This failed program that received congressional approval to spend more than $12 billion.”
“I’m not buying it,” Luria told USNI News in May of this year. “We need to look at what we have today and how we can use it and how we can use it most efficiently. The idea of divesting of current platforms that still have usable service life in order to invest in something that we might develop the technology for in the future – paired with our poor track record on [developing new] platforms – just makes absolutely no sense to me.”
If decommissioning the LCS Freedom makes no sense to Representative Luria, what makes even less logical sense is this: Why are we still building more of a failed ship design that has cost taxpayers tens of billions of dollars?
“Ten years after the introduction of the first Spearheads, the Navy is still trying to find missions for them.” Says maritime historian Dr. Sal Mercogliano, producer of the popular YouTube series ‘What is Going on With Shipping‘. “Current plans have two being converted into hospital transports, one into an autonomous ship platform, and more on the way. Current tests include loading Marines onboard for forward presence, use as a training platform with allied navies, and other missions that don’t require a Navy combatant.”
BEIJING, April 4 (Reuters) – China has demanded that Taiwan compensate Chinese fishermen for losses after a Taiwanese navy landing ship and a Chinese fishing boat collided outside restricted waters last week....
The nearly 50-year old USS Nimitz, the lead vessel of its class, departed from the Naval Air Station in San Diego for what is likely to be its final deployment....
Testing of counter-drone technology near Reagan Washington National Airport by the U.S. Secret Service and Navy earlier this month led to numerous flight crews receiving faulty alerts of potentially nearby aircraft, the Federal Aviation Administration and a U.S. senator said on Thursday.
March 27, 2025
Total Views: 3859
Get The Industry’s Go-To News
Subscribe to gCaptain Daily and stay informed with the latest global maritime and offshore news
— just like 109,251 professionals
Secure Your Spot
on the gCaptain Crew
Stay informed with the latest maritime and offshore news, delivered daily straight to your inbox
— trusted by our 109,251 members
Your Gateway to the Maritime World!
Essential news coupled with the finest maritime content sourced from across the globe.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.