Ships sail across the Gulf of Suez towards the Red Sea before entering the Suez Canal, in El Ain El Sokhna in Suez, east of Cairo, Egypt, March 17, 2018. Picture taken March 17, 2018. REUTERS/Amr Abdallah Dalsh
By Alex Longley (Bloomberg) The cost of war-risk insurance for vessels sailing through the Red Sea is spiraling, adding a further potential impediment to trade passing through a waterway already labeled too dangerous for merchant shipping by the US Navy.
Underwriters are now charging between 0.75% and 1% of the value of the ship to sail through the region, according to people familiar with the matter, jumping significantly since US and UK airstrikes targeted the Houthi rebels in Yemen at the end of last week. Just a few weeks ago, quotes for cover were about one tenth of that amount. The sharp increase runs the risk of making it too expensive to traverse the vital waterway.
Shipowners and charterers who are prepared to risk sailing through the Red Sea are having to weigh whether it’s cheaper to pay the mounting additional insurance costs as well as the transit fee for the Suez Canal, or instead take the long route around the Cape of Good Hope and in so doing rack up additional fuel bills.
“War risk insurance premiums for ships have skyrocketed,” Clarksons Securities analysts including Frode Morkedal said in a report. “Shipowners and charterers may find that rerouting around Africa is more cost-effective than incurring the combined costs of Suez Canal transit fees and insurance premiums.”
A war insurance cost of 1% for a newbuild ship worth $100 million would mean having to pay $1 million just to sail through the riskiest parts of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. Cover is generally quoted as a percentage of the value of a vessel over a given time period.
On Monday, a US owned commercial ship was hit by a missile while sailing in the Gulf of Aden, underscoring the persistent risk to vessels in the region. That came as Bimco, a key trade group, highlighted a US Navy warning that shipping companies should consider avoiding the area.
In addition, the US Department of Transportation issued an updated alert advising its merchant vessels to avoid the Southern Red Sea until further notice. A previous alert had warned vessels to stay away for 72 hours.
“Rates are increasing which is reflective of the significant and opaque risk exposure within the Red Sea,” said Munro Anderson, head of operations at marine war risk and insurance specialist Vessel Protect. “The key difficulty presented by the current situation is the rate of change in risk profile leading to far more dynamic pricing than would normally be the case.”
© 2024 Bloomberg L.P.
Join the gCaptain Club for curated content, insider opinions, and vibrant community discussions.
Join the 105,252 members that receive our newsletter.
Have a news tip? Let us know.
Chantier Davie Canada Inc., aka Davie Shipbuilding, has secured its first contract under Canada’s National Shipbuilding Strategy (NSS). The contract, awarded by the Canadian Government, involves the design of a...
The International Maritime Organization’s Marine Environment Protection Committee has approved the establishment of two new Emission Control Areas (ECAs) in Canada’s Arctic waters and the Norwegian Sea. The ECAs, proposed...
By Mike Wackett (The Loadstar) – Japanese carrier ONE and Taiwan’s Yang Ming today issued a transpacific network update to apply following the departure of Hapag-Lloyd from THE Alliance (THEA) next...
Access exclusive insights, engage in vibrant discussions, and gain perspectives from our CEO.
Sign Up
Maritime and offshore news trusted by our 105,252 members delivered daily straight to your inbox.
Essential news coupled with the finest maritime content sourced from across the globe.
Sign Up
Join The Club
