WILMINGTON, Del, Sept 23 (Reuters) – Failed South Korean container carrier Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd told a U.S. judge on Friday that cargo owners were withholding up to $80 million in payments for completed shipments, complicating the company’s ability to move stranded freight.
“Hanjin is not the only bad guy here,” Ilana Volkov, an attorney for the shipping company, said at a status hearing at a U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Newark, New Jersey.
Hanjin lawyers said that many cargo owners had received their goods on credit but have yet to pay the shipping company.
Hanjin, the world’s seventh-largest container carrier, filed for bankruptcy in August, stranding $14 billion worth of cargo at sea as the company lacked cash to pay cargo handlers, tug operators or ports.
South Korea’s government said on Friday that enough money had been pledged to unload Hanjin ships by the end of October.
An attorney for Ashley Furniture Industries, a Wisconsin-based furniture maker, told Friday’s hearing the company anticipated that costs related to Hanjin’s failure would eventually exceed what it owed for past shipments.
“To hold onto this money is important,” said Jeremy Ryan, the attorney for Ashley.
Like many retailers and other cargo owners, Ashley has been stuck paying to get its cargo from the dockside, even though Hanjin had been paid to deliver it to an inland destination.
In addition, many retailers and other cargo owners have complained they have been stuck with empty Hanjin containers that ports have been unwilling to take back.
Ryan said Ashley was paying up to $7,000 daily related to storage and other fees for the empty containers and the only way to recoup those costs was to refuse to pay Hanjin what was owed for completed deliveries.
Judge John Sherwood said he understood the need to “minimize the pain” of Hanjin’s collapse.
The judge told Hanjin’s attorneys the company was right in trying to get cargo moving “but there has to be some recognition you might be able to deliver on the terms you promised to deliver on.”
Rail operators and other cargo handlers defended themselves at Friday’s hearing against allegations they were price-gouging freight owners.
Hanjin had said in a court filing it was told that cargo handlers such as rail operators were charging more than what those handlers charged Hanjin. (Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Richard Chang)
by Muvija M LONDON (Reuters) – Britain on Thursday sanctioned five vessels and two associated entities involved in the shipping of Russian LNG, with the government saying it was using new legal powers...
by Captain John Konrad (gCaptain) On a crisp morning that should have promised smooth sailing, Captain Mike Vinik found himself staring at a maze of steel and concrete where open water used...
by Sachin Ravikumar (Reuters) Immigration tops the list of issues that Britons consider most important for the first time since 2016 – when Britain voted to leave the European Union...
August 18, 2024
Total Views: 1482
Why Join the gCaptain Club?
Access exclusive insights, engage in vibrant discussions, and gain perspectives from our CEO.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.