BP PLC is alleging that Halliburton Co. destroyed evidence in the weeks following the Deepwater Horizon explosion in 2010 that demonstrated that the cement formula the firm used on the drilling operation was flawed.
The claim, made Monday in a federal civil-court filing in New Orleans, is the latest in a continuing volley of accusations between the companies as they face potentially huge civil and criminal penalties stemming from the 2010 accident in the Gulf of Mexico that killed a total of 11 people and led to the largest offshore oil spill in the U.S. history.
Halliburton has previously said that it believes the cement mix it recommended that BP use on the well was stable. It has argued that the well failed because of poor engineering and design choices made by BP.
BP argued in its filing that Halliburton conducted tests following the April 20, 2010, accident that determined that the same cement formula used on the Deepwater Horizon well did have problems.
A Halliburton spokeswoman said Monday that BP’s claims were “without merit, and we look forward to contesting their motion in court.”
According to depositions in a collection of civil lawsuits that are set to go to trial in February, a Halliburton technician in the company’s Duncan, Okla., research lab said he recreated the cement formula in late April or early May 2010 and found it to be “thin,” and not suitable for the job.
The employee testified he threw out the test results and didn’t put his conclusions in writing to a supervisor, because he was concerned they could be “misinterpreted” and his word “twisted and turned,” according to the filings.
Halliburton also created a computerized model of the well cement job after the accident that found that BP’s well design did not create the problems that Halliburton attributed to BP, according to the filing by BP on Monday.
BP claims Halliburton failed to provide records of the tests during the legal discovery process, and later told BP officials that data collected and materials used in the testing had been thrown out.
BP is asking a federal judge to sanction Halliburton for misconduct. It also demanded that a computer used for the analysis be turned over to an independent forensic testing firm.
In September, Halliburton made accusations of its own, saying that BP hid key information about the well in the Deepwater Horizon accident that could have prevented it. BP has denied that claim.
Orsted Chief Executive Mads Nipper will step down to be replaced by company insider Rasmus Errboe, the world's biggest offshore wind developer said on Friday, as it seeks to arrest an 83% slump in its share price since its 2021 peak.
The developer behind New Jersey’s first offshore wind farm plans to continue the project despite Shell’s withdrawal from the project. Shell on Thursday announced its exit from the Atlantic Shores...
Shell Plc said it has written off almost $1 billion and withdrawn from a US offshore wind farm as President Donald Trump seeks to stymie the industry’s development with executive orders.
January 30, 2025
Total Views: 1652
Sign Up Now for gCaptain Daily
We’ve got your daily industry news related to the global maritime and offshore industries.
JOIN OUR CREW
Maritime and offshore news trusted by our 109,002 members delivered daily straight to your inbox.
Your Gateway to the Maritime World!
Essential news coupled with the finest maritime content sourced from across the globe.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.