Bayonne Bridge Is No Easy (or cheap) Fix

Published: October 28th, 2008 by mike | Comments |


large bridges04 Bayonne Bridge Is No Easy (or cheap) Fix

The Port of New York and New Jersey have recently announced that the raising or replacing of the Bayonne Bridge could be upwards of $2B.  The bridge, which stands 151 ft over the Kill Van Kull at its highest point, is too low for the next generation of massive container ships.  The bridge is the largest obstacle facing growth in the port.  Traffic World Online tells us:

Richard Larrabee, the port authority’s port commerce director, spoke Monday at the bistate port’s 8th Annual Port Industry Day. Earlier estimates had been that the project would cost about $1 billion.

“The Bayonne Bridge is the Number One issue in the port,” Larrabee said. The authority expects to complete a study by next summer on how to replace or raise the bridge, which crosses the channel to container terminals in the Port Newark-Elizabeth complex in New Jersey and New York Container Terminal on Staten Island.

The Port Authority is currently in the midst of a study to decide what is the most efficient way to solve this problem, whether it is raising the height or replacing the bridge, or or building a tunnel under the Kill Van Kull.

The Bayonne Bridge, at 8640 ft, is currently the third longest steel arch bridge in the world and was the longest when it was completed in 1931.  Built by the Port Authority of New York, it was constructed to allow vehicle traffic from Staten Island to reach Manhattan via the Holland Tunnel.

Related Articles

Categories: Bridges

Tags: · , , , ,





-

  • Charles E. Hoffman, Jr.
    Back in '95 when MOTBY's BRAC was announced I had my contact with the PA raise the issue of the PA taking over the facility with its approx seven miles on internal rail system and cojoin it with Global. The western end could the be developed into a slot type berth for working the giant containerships from both sides. Faster trurn arounds, direct access to NJTP, direct access to north/south and westward rail lines, eastern end of what is going to become an expanded Global facility would be avail for smaller container ships, loading/ discharging Short Sea Shipping assets, and negate the capital investment needed to correct the bridge problem.
    But, didn't happen Thanks to the PA 's failure to foresee the future and to stand up to the politicians by demanding transfer of the property to the PA for wider REGIONAL vice narrower and much lower municipal Economic Benefits.

    CEH
    SUNY MC '60
  • gcaptain
    Correct JP!
  • JPR
    Because it's named after Eugenius H. Outerbridge and they didn't want to call it the "Outerbridge Bridge".
  • Interesting idea Jack.

    Trivia question: What is the reason for the Outerbridge Crossing having such a redundant sounding name?
  • Jack
    Just do away with it. Upgrade the Goethals bridge which is a short distance to the south and add a spur to Bayonne for a lot less money.
blog comments powered by Disqus




Search This Blog



Prefer Google? Click HERE


Subscribe Via Email

Daily Updates


Bi-Weekly Newsletter







Browse Categories




Authors



Recent Comments



Tags


Twitter License Plate