By Olga Yagova, Dmitry Zhdannikov and Florence Tan MOSCOW/LONDON, June 25 (Reuters) – In the opinion of Russian officials, the oil contamination crisis that disrupted flows from the world’s second-largest exporter of crude this spring is long over.
But a closer look at a dozen tankers containing dirty Russian oil suggests that for the buyers, the debacle has a long way to run and will cost them hundreds of millions of dollars.
Two months since buyers discovered Russia was shipping oil contaminated with organic chloride, which is designed to boost output but can destroy refining equipment, less than half of the tainted crude loaded on tankers has found end-users.
More than 1 million tonnes worth around $500 million remains homeless, zigzagging between Europe and Asia. In China, buyers have refused to take dirty Russian oil, forcing trader Vitol to send a cargo back to Europe.
The Chinese development has not previously been reported.
That means buyers are struggling to place oil even at discounts of $10-15 per barrel – or $10-15 million per regular Suezmax tanker – to the current, regular price of $65 a barrel.
“I’m not willing to risk our equipment just for cheap crude,” said an oil trader with a North Asian refinery.
Buyers have also paid millions of dollars in demurrage charges as tankers are stuck with the dirty oil, preventing ship-owners from sending them on new voyages.
Russia has promised to compensate buyers after they file claims post-sale.
“The problem is that this oil is often impossible to sell. So how can I file a claim?,” a Russian oil buyer said.
“Sometimes you have a feeling that Russia has moved on from the issue. There was a meeting with buyers at the beginning of June. Since then, we’ve had no communication whatsoever,” another major buyer said.
The Russian Energy Ministry and Transneft did not respond to a request for comment.
CHINA SAYS “NO”
News of the dirty oil broke in late April when buyers from the Baltic port of Ust-Luga and along the Druzhba pipeline to Germany, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, Ukraine, Belarus and the Czech Republic discovered organic chloride content 10-20 times above normal levels.
After several weeks of debate, Russian pipeline monopoly Transneft pledged to pay compensation to Russian producers such as Rosneft, Surgutneftegas, as well as Kazakhstan, for contaminated oil.
Those producers shall in turn compensate Western buyers including oil traders Vitol, Glencore, Trafigura and oil majors Total, Shell, BP, Eni and PKN Orlen, among others.
Hopes were high that China and India would take a big chunk of dirty oil – as at least 800,000 tonnes began to sail from Europe to Asia – but those have not materialised.
Five trading sources said Chinese customs authorities had told buyers not to take crude with organic chloride content above the Russian standard of 10 parts per million. Some cargoes had as much as 100-200 ppm. The authorities declined to comment.
Suezmax Chios I, fixed by Vitol, has been floating around the Suez for a month, initially set to be sold to an independent Chinese refiner, but is now heading back to Europe with no final buyer, according to traders and ship-tracking data.
Another Vitol Suezmax, the Sonangol Rangel carrying 140,000 tonnes of contaminated Urals, was bought by Chinese independent refiner Bora Group initially for its mainland Dalian plant, but is now heading to storage near Malacca.
A very large crude carrier (VLCC) with 270,000 tonnes, Glencore’s Amyntas, also went to Singapore instead of China.
So far, only Sinopec has been allowed to import dirty crude – in the 2-million-barrel VLCC New Comfort – into Ningbo-Zhoushan, eastern China, because it bought the oil in early April before the contamination news broke, trading sources said. The vessel is due to arrive in China on July 12.
Sinopec, Vitol and Glencore declined to comment.
STEEP DEMURRAGE BILLS
In Europe, a limited number of buyers dared to refine the oil including Spain’s Repsol, Swedish Preem and Finnish Neste Oil, according to traders and Refinitiv Eikon flows data. They are estimated to have taken 600,000 tonnes.
Dirty oil needs to be diluted before being refined, sometimes one tainted barrel with 20 barrels of clean oil.
“We took a cargo to one of our refineries. It’s still being refined and is likely to be for several more months,” a trader with an oil major told Reuters.
Meanwhile, at least four cargoes of 100,000 tonnes each are anchored at various European ports and have yet to find a home.
Demurrage costs for the tankers have exceeded $1 million per vessel, four trade sources said.
In one such example, the FSL Shanghai ship chartered by BP has zigzagged between the European ports of Ventspils and Rotterdam since loading in Ust-Luga on May 2.
As of Monday, it still had no buyer and had paid $1.3 million in demurrage charges to date with every new day costing an extra $25,000, trading and shipping sources said.
BP did not respond to a request for comment.
Total’s Mendeleev Prospect vessel has been anchored near the Polish port of Gdansk since April 27, while Glencore’s Searuby and Searanger vessels are anchored near Turkey’s Aliaga and the UK shore. (Reporting by Olga Yagova in Moscow, Dmitry Zhdannikov in London and Florence Tan in Singapore; Additional reporting by Aizhu Chen and Isabel Wang; Editing by Dale Hudson)
by Captain John Konrad (gCaptain) On a crisp morning that should have promised smooth sailing, Captain Mike Vinik found himself staring at a maze of steel and concrete where open water used...
by Sachin Ravikumar (Reuters) Immigration tops the list of issues that Britons consider most important for the first time since 2016 – when Britain voted to leave the European Union...
New York Maritime College’s new training ship, Empire State VII, is canceling its planned European port visits during its maiden summer cruise and returning to the western Atlantic. The decision...
July 6, 2024
Total Views: 7721
Why Join the gCaptain Club?
Access exclusive insights, engage in vibrant discussions, and gain perspectives from our CEO.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.