Comments on: qe3? cunard lines orders a new ship http://gcaptain.com/the-qe3-cunard-lines-orders-a-new-ship/?624 Wed, 10 Aug 2011 07:11:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: John http://gcaptain.com/the-qe3-cunard-lines-orders-a-new-ship/?624#comment-2662 John Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:06:29 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/the-qe3-cunard-lines-orders-a-new-ship/#comment-2662 Phillip, Thanks for the heads up. It appears that the BBC got the specifics wrong and changed their story... take a look at the original version from google cache: http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:VsdcGYg0ZVgJ:news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/berkshire/7037250.stm I'll make the changes as well. Phillip,

Thanks for the heads up. It appears that the BBC got the specifics wrong and changed their story… take a look at the original version from google cache:
http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:VsdcGYg0ZVgJ:news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/berkshire/7037250.stm

I’ll make the changes as well.

]]> By: John http://gcaptain.com/the-qe3-cunard-lines-orders-a-new-ship/?624#comment-13726 John Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:06:29 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/the-qe3-cunard-lines-orders-a-new-ship/#comment-13726 Phillip,<br><br>Thanks for the heads up. It appears that the BBC got the specifics wrong and changed their story... take a look at the original version from google cache:<br><a href="http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:VsdcGYg0ZVgJ:news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/berkshire/7037250.stm">http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:VsdcGYg0ZV...</a><br><br>I'll make the changes as well. Phillip,

Thanks for the heads up. It appears that the BBC got the specifics wrong and changed their story… take a look at the original version from google cache:
http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:VsdcGYg0ZV…

I’ll make the changes as well.

]]> By: Phillip http://gcaptain.com/the-qe3-cunard-lines-orders-a-new-ship/?624#comment-2659 Phillip Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:29:52 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/the-qe3-cunard-lines-orders-a-new-ship/#comment-2659 Your headline reads incorrectly and is misleading. ("Cunard Lines orders new larger version of the Queen Mary 2.") Cunard is NOT building a liner bigger than the QM2. It is considerably smaller than the QM2 but will be larger than the soon-to-be-launched Queen Victoria. The new ship will be named Queen Elizabeth, after the ill-fated first Queen Elizabeth. Your headline reads incorrectly and is misleading. (“Cunard Lines orders new larger version of the Queen Mary 2.”) Cunard is NOT building a liner bigger than the QM2. It is considerably smaller than the QM2 but will be larger than the soon-to-be-launched Queen Victoria. The new ship will be named Queen Elizabeth, after the ill-fated first Queen Elizabeth.

]]> By: Phillip http://gcaptain.com/the-qe3-cunard-lines-orders-a-new-ship/?624#comment-13040 Phillip Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:29:52 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/the-qe3-cunard-lines-orders-a-new-ship/#comment-13040 Your headline reads incorrectly and is misleading. ("Cunard Lines orders new larger version of the Queen Mary 2.") Cunard is NOT building a liner bigger than the QM2. It is considerably smaller than the QM2 but will be larger than the soon-to-be-launched Queen Victoria. The new ship will be named Queen Elizabeth, after the ill-fated first Queen Elizabeth. Your headline reads incorrectly and is misleading. (“Cunard Lines orders new larger version of the Queen Mary 2.”) Cunard is NOT building a liner bigger than the QM2. It is considerably smaller than the QM2 but will be larger than the soon-to-be-launched Queen Victoria. The new ship will be named Queen Elizabeth, after the ill-fated first Queen Elizabeth.

]]> By: the qe3? cunard lines orders a new ship | gCaptain.com http://gcaptain.com/the-qe3-cunard-lines-orders-a-new-ship/?624#comment-2658 the qe3? cunard lines orders a new ship | gCaptain.com Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:54:50 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/the-qe3-cunard-lines-orders-a-new-ship/#comment-2658 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] October 10th, 2007 · No Comments [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] October 10th, 2007 · No Comments [...]

]]>