<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gCaptain - Maritime &#38; Offshore &#187; future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gcaptain.com/tag/future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gcaptain.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:34:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Re-engaging Your Senses &#8211; The Future Of Integrated Bridge Design</title>
		<link>http://gcaptain.com/reengaging-senses-future-integrated/?18801</link>
		<comments>http://gcaptain.com/reengaging-senses-future-integrated/?18801#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Konrad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/?p=18801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you miss the ticks of the analog gyro repeater? Today&#8217;s gyro compasses are more functional and easy to interface with modern electronics but they lack the ticks which were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/mk-727-sperry-gyro-compass.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-18802" title="mk-727-sperry-gyro-compass" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/mk-727-sperry-gyro-compass.png" alt="mk-727-sperry-gyro-compass" width="479" height="304" /></a></p>
<p>Do you miss the ticks of the analog gyro repeater?</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s gyro compasses are more functional and easy to interface with modern electronics but they lack the ticks which were so effective in letting <em>feel</em> the ship&#8217;s rate of turn. I also miss single function electronics. Sure I enjoy viewing AIS, radar, and propulsion information on one screen but, the problem is, the alarms now sound all the same.</p>
<p>The modern bridge has become a visually enticing environment but at the expense of our other senses. Sure you can still feel the ship&#8217;s motion but you can&#8217;t smell the cargo from the CCR, feel the wind from inside climate controlled bridge wings, or hear the increasingly rapid clicks of the gyro when the helmsman gets sleepy.</p>
<p>The future of marine electronics and integrated bridge systems will include terms like ergonomics, tactile response and acoustic resonance. Of course, won&#8217;t need to know these terms but they will work together to engage the watchstander by stimulating all five senses.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t predict the return of smell-o-vision, I do see a future in which naval architects borrow ideas from Hollywood and theme park designers to improve the situational awareness of watchstanders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcaptain.com/reengaging-senses-future-integrated/?18801/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future Of Shipping Via&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://gcaptain.com/the-future-of-shipping-via/?16275</link>
		<comments>http://gcaptain.com/the-future-of-shipping-via/?16275#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 03:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Konrad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/?p=16275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Future Via Japan In 1936, a Japanese magazine called Shonen Club published a series of illustrations imagining what the future of transportation might look like. Among them, this giant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>The Future Via Japan</h2>
<p><img title="future-ship-japan" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/future-ship-japan.jpg" alt="Japanese Future Ship" width="500" /></p>
<p>In 1936, a Japanese magazine called Shonen Club published a series of illustrations imagining what the future of transportation might look like. Among them, this giant ship that can spit out smaller ships from an embedded dock.  (Via <a href="http://thescuttlefish.com/2010/07/05/1936-japans-idea-of-futuristic-ocean-liners/">Scuttlefish</a>, via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2010/06/30/future-of-transporta.html">boingboing</a>)<br />
<span id="more-16275"></span></p>
<h2><small>The Future Via Detriot</small></h2>
<p><img src="http://www.hydrofoil.com/images/redboat.jpg" alt="unlimited hydrofoil" /></p>
<p>It has options for buying more exising air transports like the C17 and more of the LMSR (Large medium speed roll on/roll off ships)</p>
<p>The more interesting options are the development of improved airlift and sealift systems. For airlift, they examine heavy lift hybrid airships, which are blimps that also have dynamic lift. The airships would have 500 plus ton cargo capacity with 80-120 knot speed (100knot average). The high speed ships they are examining are NAVSEA Trimaran concept with 55 knot/hour speed, 5000 ton payload capacity, 360 MW of installed power, 8,700 nautical mile range and 8 days to transit 10,000 nautical miles. </p>
<p>A near-term high speed ship with less technical risk with 45 knot/hour speed, 10,000 ton payload capacity, 250 MW of power, 5,000 nm range and 9 days to transit 10,000 nm. </p>
<p>Ken has numerous “Design Originals” including the first miniature resuscitator used in space shuttles; the first Doppler radar speed-measuring device; the first chemical alcohol-measuring device (Breathalyzer) and the first hydrofoil ever to exceed 100 mph <small><a href="http://nextbigfuture.com/2006/11/improving-future-air-and-ship.html">. (Via Next Big Future</a>)</small></small></p>
<h2><small>The Future Via The Past</small></h2>
<p><small><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_VyTCyizqrHs/SaXNtUFqGaI/AAAAAAAAC3Q/aU_86B7K_Hw/s1600/aldebaran2.jpg" alt="future cruise ship design" /></p>
<p>No info on this vessel of our dreams but it sure would be fun to drive.</p>
<h2>The Future Via The Afterlife</h2>
<p><img src="http://spectrum.ieee.org/images/feb07/images/nuc01.jpg" alt="future cryogenic ship" /></p>
<p>This ship design was actually built but lacked funding to keep her running. The idea? To transport cryogenically frozen remains of rich people to the Arctic so they did not have to spend eternity in expensive freezers. <a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/images/feb07/images/nuc01.jpg">Fooled you</a></p>
<h2>The Future Via A Barrel</h2>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-16278" title="Barrel-Ship" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Barrel-Ship.png" alt="Barrel Ship Of The Future Oceans" width="500" height="376" />anixs)</p>
<p>To demonstrate the feasibility of his design for a high-speed ship that rolls over the water like a barrel, a marine engineer of Port Blakely, Wash., has constructed an electric-powered model that is reported to perform all the maneuvers of a conventional vessel. He proposes building full sized ocean vessels on a similar plan, with stationary decks for passengers and cargo inside the revolving, electrically driven shell. The project recalls that of another barrel ship inventor of an earlier day, who actually completed a 110-foot model of his steam-powered craft and piloted it 200 miles across Lake Ontario (P.S.M., Dec, ’33, p. 26). (<a href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/10/17/designs-barrel-ship-for-use-at-sea/">Via Modern Mech</a><a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Barrel-Ship.png"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcaptain.com/the-future-of-shipping-via/?16275/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wind Turbine Designs &#8211; The 11 Most Interesting</title>
		<link>http://gcaptain.com/the-most-interesting-wind-turbine-designs/?3397</link>
		<comments>http://gcaptain.com/the-most-interesting-wind-turbine-designs/?3397#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Konrad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy_technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/?p=3397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are the 11 most interesting Wind Turbine Designs? Today&#8217;s hottest job market for mariners is Offshore Oil and Gas but this is by no means the only controversial industry [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3399" title="SuperTurbine" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/turbine11.jpg" alt="SuperTurbine" width="500" /></p>
<p>What are the 11 most interesting <em><strong>Wind Turbine Designs</strong></em>?</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s hottest job market for mariners is Offshore Oil and Gas but this is by no means the only controversial industry segment which presents opportunities to mariners. Like exploratory drilling, Offshore wind farms have also <a href="http://capeweb1.meganet.net/~sosweb/node/481">raised controversy</a> among industry experts but presents unique job opportunities for those looking for more than the average liner run. Today we look at the 5 most interesting wind turbine designs.<br />
.<span id="more-3397"></span></p>
<h3>Helix Wind</h3>
<h3><a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/helix-wind-turbine.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3396" title="helix-wind-turbine" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/helix-wind-turbine.png" alt="Helix Wind Turbine" /></a></h3>
<p>Helix Wind, who offers a well-designed system that creates electricity to power any home or small business. The Savonius turbine-based design catches wind from all directions, creating smooth powerful torque to spin the electric generator. It’s mounted up to 35 feet high, in winds as low as 10 mph, thus allowing the Helix system to fulfill electricity needs, while being congruous with the environment. The strength of the wind is captured by Helix’s distinctive and efficient vertical blade design. The vertical Savonious 2.0 and Savonious 5.0 have a patent pending design which empowers the turbine to convert wind power into energy less than 5 decibels above background noise. Translation… The noise that the turbine makes is similar to the noise generated when wind passes through a tree or a house, compared to conventional horizontal wind turbines that operate at up to ten times above the wind speed, which is responsible for the piercing whistling sound near wind farms. (Source: <a href="http://gliving.tv/technology-science/helix-wind-free-renewable-power/">gLiving.tv</a> | <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9flSPAdOLk">Video</a>)</p>
<h3>QuietRevolution</h3>
<p><img title="quietrevolution-wind-turbine" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/quietrevolution-wind-turbine.jpg" alt="QuietRevolution Wind Turbine" width="500" /><br />
This is equivalent to about five low-energy houses’ electricity demand, or the electrical needs of a twenty man office. Unlike other turbines which are usually noisy the unique shape of the quietrevolution turbine allows it to operate in near silent which is ideal for operating close to residential areas. The distinctive helical shape of the turbine is also eye pleasing which is impotent since many communities rejected wind turbines because of their visual impact.  (Source: <a href="http://thefutureofthings.com/pod/163/quietrevolution-helical-wind-turbine.html">TheFutureOfThings</a>)</p>
<h3>Selsam Super Turbine</h3>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3400" title="saleem-super-turbine" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/saleem-super-turbine.png" alt="" /><br />
The innovative Selsam SuperTurbine off-shore concept was designed for simplicity, as it eliminates all components that do not directly contribute to power generation, resulting in a low-cost wind turbine. The unit is equipped with multiple, synchronous, small rotors and with a universal joint that enables it to tilt. Because of this structure, the turbines resemble reeds bending in the wind. The optional addition of a blimp can make this floating wind turbine even more powerful. The Selsam prototype was able to produce 6,000 watts in 32.5 mph winds, proving the efficiency and effectiveness of the design. (Source: <a href="http://thefutureofthings.com/pod/1183/selsam-superturbine.html">TFOT</a>)</p>
<h3>Salsam Sky Serpant</h3>
<p><a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/sky-serpant-wind-turbine.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3401" title="sky-serpant-wind-turbine" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/sky-serpant-wind-turbine.jpg" alt="sky serpant wind turbine" /></a></p>
<p>The advantages of the SuperTurbine design are many. First, during large and fierce storms, these deep water turbines may intentionally lay down by flooding chambers, or even completely submerge to survive. Bonus! Second, flotation near the surface forms a fulcrum, with the weight of the rotors and driveshaft balanced by a downward force from the mooring below. According to the site, this allows the turbine to bend similar to arching your back to take advantage of wind patterns much more easily. Additionally, the rotors can be staggered, spiral, or in line. (Source: <a href="http://www.groovygreen.com/groove/?p=2876">GroovyGreen</a>)</p>
<h3>The LoopWing</h3>
<p><img src="http://i.treehugger.com/wind_turbine.jpg" alt="wind_turbine.jpg" width="468" height="353" /></p>
<p>This is the &#8220;<a href="http://www.loopwing.co.jp/en/loopwing.html">LoopWing</a>&#8221; wind turbine. It is soon to be unveiled in Japan&#8217;s Eco-Products 2006 Exhibition. The E1500 model turbine is aimed at homeowners, and it sports a unique wing design that operates with low vibration, and at wind speeds as low as 1.6 m/sec. The efficiency specs on the turbine are vague — &#8220;43% power performance at optimum wind speeds&#8221; is all published.(Source: <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/11/loopwing_wind_t.php">Treehugger</a>)</p>
<h3>The Egg Beater</h3>
<h3><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3402" title="wind-turbine-egg-beater" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/wind-turbine-egg-beater.jpg" alt="Egg Beater Wind Turbine" width="500" /></h3>
<p>BSI, the British Standards Institute, gave first prize in its Sustainability Awards 2007 to Ben Storan for his &#8220;afforable personal wind turbine suited to the urban environment.&#8221; According to the BSI, The result is a unique design which uses vertical, rather than traditional horizontal, rotation. This feature gives a slower rotational speed, which allows the turbine to capture more energy from turbulent air flow, common to urban environments. It also means quieter operation. (Source:: <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/06/new_turbine_des.php">Treehugger</a>)</p>
<h3>Magenn Air Generator</h3>
<p><img src="/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/magenn2.jpg" border="0" alt="magenn2.jpg" width="462" height="320" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.magenn.com/" target="_blank">Magenn Air Generator </a>- While designed for shore based power stations, not ships, could they one day be repurposed? ”</p>
<p>Magenn’s system is a lighter-than-air wind turbine capable of powering a rural village &#8211; the 30 metre wide, helium-filled “Air Rotor System” contains a turbine that spins around a horizontal axis and can produce 10 kilowatts of energy as it floats above the ground while attached to a copper tether. Larger models — ones that might power a skyscraper — are also reportedly in the works. The company claims the governments of <a href="http://www.punjabnewsline.com/content/view/7226/38/">India</a> and Pakistan have expressed interest in the first version. Magenn is planning to <a href="http://www.thestar.com/News/Ideas/article/289555">launch a 1kw prototype</a> (costing around C$1 million) into the air above Ottawa this (northern) spring.” <a href="http://peakenergy.blogspot.com/2008/01/alternative-wind-power-experiments.html" target="_blank">Read More…</a></p>
<h3>Kite Turbine</h3>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3403" title="kite-turbine-wind-energy" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/kite-turbine-wind-energy.png" alt="Kite Turbine" /></p>
<p>Chetwoods Associates, an architectural group from Great Britain, has come up with a new environmental design that promises to capture wind power in an odd but innovative manner: By using a huge replica sail as a model. The first version of this idea will use a giant spinnaker sail placed in a mountain gorge near Russia’s Lake Ladoga area. A spinnaker is a type of sail usually made for boats taking wind from &#8216;a reaching course to a downwind, i.e. with the wind 90°–180° off the bow.&#8217; It&#8217;s supposed to take in the wind, powerfully generated between a mountainside channel, and then further funnel that energy through an attached turbine. It&#8217;s safe to assume that there would be power conduit beneath the river to drag in the converted energy for community use. (Source: <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/11/kite-like-sail.html">Wired</a>)</p>
<h3>WindSpiral Turbine</h3>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3404" title="wind-spiral-turbine" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/wind-spiral-turbine.png" alt="WindSpiral Turbine" /></p>
<p>At a height of 30 ft. tall and only 2 feet wide, the WindSpire converts wind energy into measurable electricity through a vertical design, a rotor/generator system (with a low speed giromill and rotating ‘air core’ motors), and a wireless modem that an owner can track on a computer. It produces about 1900 kilowatt hours per year in 12 mile per hour average winds, which is about a quarter of the total energy used by a regular U.S. house. But the key promise mentioned in <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNudnI5tzf8">the video</a>, is that if the spire was twice as thick, it could likely produce 100% of the energy needs of a household. (Source: <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/08/vertical-windsp.html">Wired</a>)</p>
<h3>MagLev Wind Turbine</h3>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3421" title="maglev_turbine" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/maglev_turbine.jpg" alt="MagLev Wind Turbine" /></p>
<p>The MagLev wind turbine is expected take wind power technology to the next level with magnetic levitation. Magnetic levitation is an extremely efficient system for wind energy. Here&#8217;s how it works: the vertically oriented blades of the wind turbine are suspended in the air above the base of the machine, replacing the need for ball bearings. The turbine uses &#8220;full-permanent&#8221; magnets, not electromagnets &#8211; therefore, it does not require electricty to run. The full-permanent magnet system employs neodymium (&#8220;rare earth&#8221;) magnets and there is no energy loss through friction. This also helps reduce maintenance costs and increases the lifespan of the generator. (Source: <a href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/11/26/super-powered-magnetic-wind-turbine-maglev/">Inhabitat</a>)</p>
<h3>Laddermill</h3>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3506" title="Laddermill Wind Turbine" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/top-wings.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p>Researchers at Delft University are building what they call a Laddermill to tap the steady and stiff winds in the jet stream. The Laddermill consists of a stack of tethered kites that soar as high as five miles and then return toward earth in an endless loop to generate electricity. As the kites sail up to the jet stream and back, they pull with them tethers that turn an electrical generator located on the ground. The Delft researchers also are experimenting with a fleet of gliders that would soar in place of the kites. (Source: <a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/fortune/0810/gallery.tech_windpower.fortune/4.html">CNN</a>)</p>
<h2>Offshore Installation &#8211; A Photo Diary</h2>
<p><a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/wind-farm-ship.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3411" title="wind-farm-ship" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/wind-farm-ship.jpg" alt="Copyright 2008 - Flickr's Frodog" /></a><br />
For those curious how these wind farms will be installed offshore&#8230; be sure to check out Frodog&#8217;s Photo Diary of the Skegness Project. You can view the diary <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/80859278@N00/sets/72157600141896599/">HERE</a> and the HD Slideshow <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/80859278@N00/sets/72157600141896599/show/">HERE</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcaptain.com/the-most-interesting-wind-turbine-designs/?3397/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Offshore Base: Theory or Reality</title>
		<link>http://gcaptain.com/mobile-offshore-base/?3180</link>
		<comments>http://gcaptain.com/mobile-offshore-base/?3180#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Schuler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy-ships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ship Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/?p=3180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Mobile Offshore Base (MOB), in theory, is a number of independently propelled semisubmersible modules that can be easily deployed to areas in need of military assistance. It&#8217;s primary functions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/vlfs1_big.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3181" title="Mobile Offshore Base" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/vlfs1_big.jpg" alt="" width="499" height="374" /></a></p>
<p>A Mobile Offshore Base (MOB), in theory, is a number of independently propelled semisubmersible modules that can be easily deployed to areas in need of military assistance. It&#8217;s primary functions would be providing a landing platform for fixed and rotary wing aircraft and stowage and transport of military cargo and personnel.  The size of the base would be virtually unlimited since each module is completely self-sustaining with personnel housing, equipment maintenance functions, cargo space, and logistical support.  An full MOB platform could range from a single module to a number of them.  <a href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/mob.htm">GlobalSecurity.org</a> tells us about the assembly:</p>
<blockquote><p>Each module consists of a box-type deck supported by multiple columns on two parallel pontoons. When transiting between operational sites, the module is deballasted and travels with the pontoons on the surface much like a catamaran. When on site, the module is ballasted down so that the pontoons are submerged below the surface wave zone, thereby minimizing the wave-induced dynamic motions. The decks, which store rolling stock and dry cargo, are all located above the wave crests. The columns provide structural support and hydrostatic stability against overturning.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, seems like a good idea, but is it a realistic and cost effective solution?<span id="more-3180"></span></p>
<p>To answer these tough questions, a program was set up in 2000 by the Office of Naval Research that would test the technological feasibility and estimate the cost of such large structures.</p>
<p>The program was able to determine that existing shipyards in the U.S. did have the capabilities to produce MOB&#8217;s up to 2 kilometer&#8217;s long and cost of such bases would be about $1.5B for a single module, with the entire 2k platform ranging from $5B to $8B.</p>
<p>In 2001, it was finally concluded that while it was technically possible to develop 2 Kilometer long MOB&#8217;s, it was not a cost effective solution.  Alternatives such as nuclear-powered aircraft carriers were favored.</p>
<p>Looking into the future, given cost-reducing technological advancements, we&#8217;ll just have to see if the concept of a Mobile Offshore Base will ever be put into production.</p>
<p>Read the full article from Global Security <a href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/mob.htm">HERE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcaptain.com/mobile-offshore-base/?3180/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ships Of The Future &#8211; LCS, Littoral Combat Ship</title>
		<link>http://gcaptain.com/ships-of-the-future-lcs-littoral-combat-ship/?1163</link>
		<comments>http://gcaptain.com/ships-of-the-future-lcs-littoral-combat-ship/?1163#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Konrad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marine Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Littoral Combat Ship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warships]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ships-of-the-future-lcs-littoral-combat-ship/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Popular Science brings us Future Navy Ships &#8211; Littoral Combat Ship. They write: This is a small, fast ship (capable of 45 knots) for sub-hunting, mine-clearing, and fighting small boats [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.popsci.com/files/imagecache/photogallery_image/files/articles/warship_littoral.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Popular Science brings us Future Navy Ships &#8211; Littoral Combat Ship. They write:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="gallery_dek">This is a small, fast ship (capable of 45 knots) for sub-hunting, mine-clearing, and fighting small boats near coastlines—the littoral region. Each LCS would be equipped with one of three distinct mission modules: a set of plug-and-play ship sensors, missiles, small boats, unmanned underwater vehicles and specially equipped helicopters, for mine warfare, anti-submarine warfare or surface combat. The base configuration would include antimissile batteries and a medium-caliber gun. The ships could clear mines and chase subs away from an area before the rest of the fleet arrived.</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="gallery_dek">Also included in the article are three other ships designed for future combat. You can view the full article with photos <a href="http://www.popsci.com/military-aviation-space/gallery/2008-02/meet-navy-future-0" target="_blank">HERE</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcaptain.com/ships-of-the-future-lcs-littoral-combat-ship/?1163/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ocean Arcologies</title>
		<link>http://gcaptain.com/ocean-arcologies/?1026</link>
		<comments>http://gcaptain.com/ocean-arcologies/?1026#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Konrad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arcitecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ocean-arcologies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Artect.ent brings us Ocean Arcologies; The notion of cities condensed into a singular structure or hyperstructure, has frequented works of fiction as far back as 1899 with H.G. Wells, When [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/b621c7ed-9f14-4509-8dca-a2f809df3bf9.jpg" alt="Floating Cities" border="0" height="161" width="400" /></p>
<p>Artect.ent brings us <em><a href="http://artect.net/?p=377">Ocean Arcologies</a></em>;</p>
<blockquote><p>The notion of cities condensed into a singular structure or hyperstructure, has frequented works of fiction as far back as 1899 with H.G. Wells, When the Sleeper Wakes. The concept garnered wider attention seventy years later when Architect Paolo Soleri published, Arcology: The City in the Image of Man. Massive self sustaining habitats, the pliable infrastructure and small ecological footprint of arcologies avoid the damaging, inefficient urban sprawl of today’s cities and suburbia.</p></blockquote>
<p>For more drawings and photos click <a href="http://artect.net/?p=377" target="_blank">HERE</a>.</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://captrichardrodriguez.blogspot.com/2008/01/floating-cities.html">BitterEnd</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcaptain.com/ocean-arcologies/?1026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

