<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gCaptain - Maritime &#38; Offshore &#187; Chief Engineer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gcaptain.com/tag/chief-engineer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gcaptain.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Naval Architecture – Designing A Quiet Ship.</title>
		<link>http://gcaptain.com/how-to-keep-a-ship-quite/?664</link>
		<comments>http://gcaptain.com/how-to-keep-a-ship-quite/?664#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Konrad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chief Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cruise Ship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holland america lines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine-engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naval architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submarines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/how-to-keep-a-ship-quite/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No this isn&#8217;t going to be a post about china&#8217;s new submarines&#8230;. instead we look at designing ships to be quiet for more relaxing purposes. Eurodam News, Holland America&#8217;s newbuild [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No this isn&#8217;t going to be a post about china&#8217;s new submarines&#8230;. instead we look at designing ships to be quiet for more relaxing purposes.</p>
<p>Eurodam News, Holland America&#8217;s newbuild blog, shares the secret;</p>
<p><small> </small></p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.eurodamnews.com/images/art-air-injection-system.jpg" alt="" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="right" />When <a href="http://www.hollandamerica.com/cruiseships/Zuiderdam">Zuiderdam</a>, the first <a href="http://www.hollandamerica.com/media/fleetFactSheets.do">Vista-class</a> ship, entered service, it quickly became evident that the aft part of the main restaurant had higher-than-usual noise and vibration levels. On all Holland America ships the aft section of the main restaurant is located above the propellers, but on Vista-class ships the main restaurant was located three decks lower and therefore is closer to the propellers.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fincantieri.com/">Fincantieri</a> engaged Danish consulting company <a href="http://www.odegaard.dk/">Odegaard &amp; Danneskiold-Samsoe</a> to work with the shipyard’s noise and vibration department to develop a solution. They hit on the idea of installing an air-injection system that would create a cushion of air bubbles between the propellers and the hull to absorb some of the noise frequencies that would otherwise be transferred directly to the hull. A similar system had been installed on private yachts before, but the technology had never been tried on a large cruise vessel.</p>
<p>For the rest of the article click <a href="http://www.eurodamnews.com/2007/08/06/air-injection-system-reduces-noise-vibration/" target="_blank">HERE</a>. Also visit gcaptain&#8217;s new Free-board for <a href="http://gcaptain.com/jobs/vacancies/12/naval-architect/jobs">Jobs In Naval Architecture</a>.</p>
<p><small>This article was originally posted in October 2007</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcaptain.com/how-to-keep-a-ship-quite/?664/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Starting the Wartsila &#8211; Video</title>
		<link>http://gcaptain.com/starting-the-wartsila-video/?1331</link>
		<comments>http://gcaptain.com/starting-the-wartsila-video/?1331#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Konrad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine-engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wartsila]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/?p=1331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Starting a Wärtsilä 6 L 64&#8230; for a truly amazing engine read our post: The Wartsila-Sulzer Super Engine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5A3So5eoL8">
<p><a href="http://gcaptain.com/starting-the-wartsila-video/?1331"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p></a></p>
<p>Starting a Wärtsilä 6 L 64&#8230; for a truly amazing engine read our post: <a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/the-wartsila-sulzer-super-engine/">The Wartsila-Sulzer Super Engine</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcaptain.com/starting-the-wartsila-video/?1331/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Rising Salaries Enough To Retain Mariners?</title>
		<link>http://gcaptain.com/are-rising-salaries-enough-to-retain-mariners/?683</link>
		<comments>http://gcaptain.com/are-rising-salaries-enough-to-retain-mariners/?683#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Konrad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[captain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief_mate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mariners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maritime_employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maritime_jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maritime_unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merchant-marine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offshore Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/are-rising-salaries-enough-to-retain-mariners/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In another excellent article, Maritime Executive&#8216;s managing editor Joseph Keefe is dead on with his assessment of salary (find the article HERE) and working condition improvements in this tight labor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--adsense#button-->In <a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/search/web-search.html?domains=gcaptain.com&amp;q=keefe&amp;sa=Search+This+Site&amp;sitesearch=gcaptain.com&amp;client=pub-7912319195832886&amp;forid=1&amp;channel=3955169390&amp;ie=ISO-8859-1&amp;oe=ISO-8859-1&amp;safe=active&amp;flav=0001&amp;sig=4s92CqqR4EuyNkLe&amp;cof=GALT%3A%23a8b9cd%3BGL%3A1%3BDIV%3A%23ffffff%3BVLC%3Aa8b9cd%3BAH%3Acenter%3BBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BLBGC%3Affffff%3BALC%3A376daa%3BLC%3A376daa%3BT%3A222222%3BGFNT%3Aa8b9cd%3BGIMP%3Aa8b9cd%3BFORID%3A11&amp;hl=en" title=<strong></strong>&#8220;Refrences to Joseph Keefe&#8221;>another</a> excellent article, <a href="http://www.maritimeexecutive.com/" title="Maritime Executive Magazine" target="_blank">Maritime Executive</a>&#8216;s managing editor Joseph Keefe is dead on with his assessment of salary (find the article <a href="http://www.newsletterscience.com/marex/readmore.cgi?issue_id=264&amp;article_id=2652&amp;l=%3C#--LIST_ID--#%3E&amp;s=%3C#--SUBSCRIBER_ID--#%3E" title="Long-Term Neglect of Mariners Continues to Haunt Maritime Employers - Joseph Keefe" target="_blank">HERE</a>) and working condition improvements in this tight labor market. The following comment in response to a discussion with one Captain sums up the discord between shore side managers and shipboard personnel perfectly;</p>
<blockquote><p>Gathering that he was earning well in excess of $100,000 per year with about six months vacation, I chided him for complaining about a job situation that a lot of people would kill to obtain. My comments were <strong><em>NOT</em></strong> well received.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well had Keefe called any member of gCaptain&#8217;s staff we could have gently clued him in on the likely response. The reason? Well he <a href="http://www.newsletterscience.com/marex/readmore.cgi?issue_id=264&amp;article_id=2652&amp;l=%3C#--LIST_ID--#%3E&amp;s=%3C#--SUBSCRIBER_ID--#%3E" title="Long Term Neglect of the Mariner" target="_blank">lays out all the major points</a> but let us add a few minor ones. Mariners currently in top positions aboard ship are loyal to their profession. We have seen tough times and stayed at sea to the protest of loved ones and in doing so have payed the price.  From high points to low a mariners life is one of hard misses. Personally I&#8217;ve sacrificed being with my family on the day of my father&#8217;s death and missed the birth of his namesake, my first child, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/cak212/1723311958/" title="The little guy" target="_blank">Jack</a>. Mine is one of the least troubling stories but the hardships are not the primary reason for the discord; it&#8217;s the rewards, or lack there of. To show my point I offer some examples;</p>
<ul>
<li>Mariners in the first Gulf War bravely supplied the troops in countless runs to the war zone and in return received &#8220;all you can eat&#8221; overtime pay and handsome bonuses. For my wife&#8217;s 30 days in the war zone she received little more than a medal.</li>
<li>Mariner&#8217;s salaries are just recently breaking above the levels (not adjusted for inflation) of those in the same position 30 years ago.</li>
<li>Sailing 30 years ago was an enjoyable experience that did not entail constant communication with management. Email and &#8220;real&#8221; phone service didn&#8217;t exist.</li>
<li>Port time is currently non-existent.</li>
<li>The U.S. mariner has historically come at a premium to their foreign conterparts but the gap is closing fast.</li>
<li>With the decline in the dollar we are suddenly being recruited be European companies that are offering considerable bonuses. U.S. companies are not following suit.</li>
<li>Specialists in support roles, mostly from Europe, freely share their salaries which can be considerable higher than an American Captain&#8217;s.</li>
<li>The majority of mariners live in areas (New England, Florida, California) of skyrocketing housing expenses.</li>
<li>Mariners are now getting arrested for incidents that, as <a href="http://www.mastermariner.org/" title="CAMM" target="_blank">CAMM</a> (The Council of American Master Mariners) put it, &#8220;were at one point considered mistakes&#8221;.</li>
<li>Today civilians are more likely to ask you how you can work for an Oil Company than reply with a statement once heard often; &#8220;Wow, what an interesting job&#8221;.</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition to these points the personnel shortage in our industry is not only a concern of company, it&#8217;s a concern for the shipboard management. The simple fact is positions are being filled by people who five years ago would not be considered ready for the job. In the past twenty years crew levels have been brought down to record low levels but overqualified crews &#8220;stuck&#8221; in positions they long ago mastered have kept the ships running smooth. Today an alarmingly high number of vessels list 100% of their officers as short-service employees (in the position for less than a year). This is not only a problem for officers but also for those on shore. Ships rely on a foundation of support from town that increasingly comes from managers lacking experience due to the same stratospheric rise in the number of promotions. These two factors equate to rising difficulties for Captains, Chief Mates and their counterparts in the engine room.</p>
<p>A manager recently asked a good friend of mine if he was ready for the big promotion to Captain, his response angered the boss. I can only assume the anger derived from the fact his statement was both accurate and troubling. He replied, &#8220;Hell no, I have no business being Captain. Professionally I&#8217;m not close to being ready but if I&#8217;m not promoted in the next few rounds you&#8217;re making a big mistake because I can run circles around my competition!&#8221; Not a good sign for those who need to trust the next man in charge of a 500 million dollar asset.</p>
<p>What he did not tell the manager is also reveling, &#8220;Why take a promotion for a few extra dollars and have to sit at a desk filling out paperwork, answering phone calls from town and dealing with petty squables. The captain use to have a stateroom twice the size of a seaman&#8217;s and fly to work in first class, now he just gets paid more.&#8221;</p>
<p>While the article was impressively accurate the following comments are not entirely correct;</p>
<blockquote><p>His pay had been augmented three or four times in the past 18 months and his employers had confirmed that pay scales had at least doubled during that period.</p></blockquote>
<p>While it&#8217;s conceivable that the payroll has double I&#8217;ve witnessed between 10 and 40% increases in senior mariner pay.</p>
<blockquote><p>Gathering that he was earning well in excess of $100,000 per year with about six months vacation</p></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;But you get <em>Six Months</em> vacation&#8221; is the first thing mariners hear during salary negotiations but it&#8217;s a misnomer. I don&#8217;t personally know a mariner who took less than 4 weeks of training classes last year and know many Chief Mate candidates who took between 12 and 16 weeks of class&#8230; that brings us down to 5 months &#8220;Vacation&#8221;. Subtract travel days, visits to the Coast Guard and days spent at the union hall and your down to less than 4.5 months (139 days).</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work-life_balance">The average American</a> takes 15 days vacation, 8 personal days and 10 holidays.  Add this to the number of weekends and (if my math is correct) shore side personel have 137 days off or only 3 days less than the mariner. Ever leave the office early on Friday or take a long lunch to visit the dentist? Mariners work 12 hours a day, every day which equates to nearly double the number of hours a &#8220;40-hour per week&#8221; American works during the year. Now I can begin to understand why gCaptain&#8217;s email box gets flooded with shore-side job related questions.</p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<p>The number one reason for the discord is rooted by Keefe&#8217;s statement;</p>
<blockquote><p>It is tempting to dismiss this as seafarer whining, but maritime executives everywhere had better strap on their hearing aids and listen to what their employees have to say. To do otherwise will only exacerbate the current crisis.</p></blockquote>
<p>On the return trip for a promising <em><strong>shore-side</strong></em> job  a prominent divorce attorney joined the discussion on NPR&#8217;s Fresh Air and said he often sits at the arbitration table looking at two people in love who share a life others only dream about and asks himself why. The reason is not that argued by either party, the reason is that neither listens to what the other is saying.</p>
<p>Mariners are being marginalized and management isn&#8217;t listening. Captains no longer have the power to solve problems aboard ship without approval from managers who frequently ask &#8220;Who died and left him in charge?&#8221;. This response filters down to the crew who justly assume their boss can not communicate their problems to distant offices ashore. This problem is exacerbated by the increased regulatory pressures, technological requirements, and industry opposition not to mention burdensome levels of training, paperwork and hands-on management from shore.</p>
<p>So while the &#8220;24/7 satellite television, e-mail, voice comms, excellent (but <a href="http://www.cafepress.com/sameshit/" title="Same Shit Different Day" target="_blank">SSDD</a>) food and media room&#8221; are nice do something that compensates me for the extra work I&#8217;ve taken on lately or double salaries instead of payroll.</p>
<p>What are management&#8217;s concerns? Not sure, I&#8217;m knocking on the divorce attorney&#8217;s door and just not listening!</p>
<p>-JD</p>
<p>This post is in response to Maritime Executive&#8217;s  article:</p>
<h4 style="margin-bottom: 0pt"><a href="http://www.newsletterscience.com/marex/readmore.cgi?issue_id=264&amp;article_id=2652&amp;l=%3C#--LIST_ID--#%3E&amp;s=%3C#--SUBSCRIBER_ID--#%3E" title="2652" name="2652">Long-Term Neglect of Mariners Continues to Haunt Maritime Employers</a></h4>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcaptain.com/are-rising-salaries-enough-to-retain-mariners/?683/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chief Engineer Convicted in Pollution Case</title>
		<link>http://gcaptain.com/chief-engineer-convicted-in-pollution-case/?647</link>
		<comments>http://gcaptain.com/chief-engineer-convicted-in-pollution-case/?647#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Konrad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chief Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marpol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coast-guard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal_discharges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine-engineering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/chief-engineer-convicted-in-pollution-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest criminal proceedings related to Marine Pollution and the use of &#8220;Magic Pipes&#8221; the Chief Engineer aboard an American-flagged car-carrier ship was convicted of one count of conspiracy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the latest criminal proceedings related to Marine Pollution and the use of &#8220;Magic Pipes&#8221; the Chief Engineer aboard an American-flagged car-carrier ship was convicted of one count of conspiracy and two counts of making false statements. Marine Link has the report:</p>
<blockquote><p>At trial, it was proven that the M/V Tanabata had a removable bypass pipe or “magic pipe” that was used to discharge oily waste without the use of an oily-water separator, a required pollution control devise. <img src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/oily-bilge-water-separator.jpg" title="Ship’s Oily Water Separator" alt="Ship’s Oily Water Separator" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="10" />The discharges were, however, falsely recorded as having been processed through the separator in the ship’s oil record book, a required log regularly inspected by the U.S. Coast Guard. An engineer testified that the defendant referred to the bypass pipe as the “illegal pipe.” It was also shown during trial that the pipe was hidden when the ship was in port so that it would not be discovered by the Coast Guard.</p>
<p>Sentencing has been set for Jan. 10, 2008, before Judge William N. Nickerson. Humphries faces a maximum of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine for each count.</p>
<p>The M/V Tanabata was operated by Pacific Gulf Marine, Inc. (PGM). PGM pleaded guilty and was sentenced on Jan. 27, 2007, to charges of making illegal discharges of oil-contaminated waste from each of four ships managed by the company. After learning of the investigation, PGM conducted and voluntarily disclosed the results of an internal investigation and cooperated with investigators and prosecutors. PGM was sentenced to pay a $1 million criminal fine and $500,000 in community service payments and to serve three years probation under the terms of an Environmental Compliance Program subject to court approval.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marinelink.com/Story/Ship’sChiefEngineerConvictedinVesselPollutionCase-209405.html" target="_blank">Continue Reading for the full article </a></p></blockquote>
<p>Looking for <a href="http://www.maritimejobsearch.com/job-openings/search">Chief Engineer Jobs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcaptain.com/chief-engineer-convicted-in-pollution-case/?647/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>kite powered ships</title>
		<link>http://gcaptain.com/kite-powered-ships/?602</link>
		<comments>http://gcaptain.com/kite-powered-ships/?602#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Konrad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chief Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beluga SkySails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kite ship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine-engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine_propulsion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propulsion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/kite-powered-ships/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are always on the lookout for &#8220;green&#8221; stories so were pleased when a friend forwarded a link to Skysails, a German based company looking to augment tradition ship propulsion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.skysails.info/uploads/pics/start_03.jpg" title="Sky Sails" alt="Sky Sails" width="500" /></p>
<p><!--adsense#button-->We are always on the lookout for &#8220;green&#8221; stories so were pleased when a friend forwarded a link to <a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ocean-kites-top-10-green-ship-designs/">Skysails</a>, a German based company looking to augment tradition ship propulsion systems with kites.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.skysails.info/index.php?L=1" title="Sky Sails" target="_blank">SkySails</a> tells us:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="justify" style="margin: 0pt">SkySails is now offering a wind propulsion system based on large towing kites, which, for the first time, meets the requirements of shipping companies.</p>
<p style="margin: 0pt">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="justify" style="margin: 0pt">By using the SkySails-System, a ship‘s fuel costs can be reduced by 10- 35% on annual average, depending on wind conditions. Under optimal wind conditions, fuel consumption can temporarily be reduced by up to 50%. Even on a small, 87 metre cargo ship, savings of up to 280,000 euros can be made annually.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/kite-powered-ships/kite-ship/" rel="attachment wp-att-603" title="Kite Ship"><img src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/shipkite.jpg" title="Kite Ship" alt="Kite Ship" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="10" /></a>They are not the only company trying to harness the power of wind to propel ship, San Francisco base <a href="http://www.kiteship.com/photos.php" title="Kite Ship Video Gallery" target="_blank">KiteShip.com</a> a maker of kites for sailboats, is also trying expand into the commercial shipping industry.</p>
<p>&#8220;KiteShip is also working on marine applications as diverse as towing oil rigs and other large marine structures, diverting icebergs from oil platforms in high latitudes and in autonomous robot towing of relatively safe cargo such as bagged water,liquid fructose and the like.&#8221;</p>
<p>Both companies have tested the technology with (according to them) success. gCaptain will be bringing you more on this story in the future, so stay tuned.</p>
<h3>Note: We have updated this post in a comprehensive look at <a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ocean-kites-top-10-green-ship-designs/" title="Kite Flying Ships and Environmental Propulsion Systems">Green Ship Propulsion</a></h3>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a video showing how the system works;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcaptain.com/kite-powered-ships/?602/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

