Comments on: Ship Types 101 – San Francisco Bay Bridge Oil Tanker Collision http://gcaptain.com/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/?764 Wed, 10 Aug 2011 07:11:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Myathida http://gcaptain.com/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/?764#comment-19272 Myathida Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:01:28 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/#comment-19272 Risk actually a negligence make by someone. Risk
actually a negligence make by someone.

]]> By: Myathida http://gcaptain.com/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/?764#comment-21975 Myathida Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:01:00 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/#comment-21975 Risk actually a negligence make by someone. Risk
actually a negligence make by someone.

]]> By: RISKS Forum: Risks Digest 24.91 http://gcaptain.com/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/?764#comment-4269 RISKS Forum: Risks Digest 24.91 Sun, 25 Nov 2007 03:24:52 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/#comment-4269 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] [Despite many reports calling it a tanker,] The Cosco Busan was actually a container ship, and the fuel on board was solely for the purpose of running the ship. http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/ [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] [Despite many reports calling it a tanker,] The Cosco Busan was actually a container ship, and the fuel on board was solely for the purpose of running the ship. http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/ [...]

]]> By: [RISKS] Risks Digest 24.91 http://gcaptain.com/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/?764#comment-3998 [RISKS] Risks Digest 24.91 Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:46:00 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/#comment-3998 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] actually a container ship, and the fuel on board was solely for the purpose of running the ship. http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/ The Coast Guard blames the pilot and the captain, and notes that its radar resolution was [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] actually a container ship, and the fuel on board was solely for the purpose of running the ship. http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/ The Coast Guard blames the pilot and the captain, and notes that its radar resolution was [...]

]]> By: The Risks Digest Volume 24: Issue 91 http://gcaptain.com/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/?764#comment-3901 The Risks Digest Volume 24: Issue 91 Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:34:18 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/#comment-3901 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] actually a container ship, and the fuel on board was solely for the purpose of running the ship. http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/ The Coast Guard blames the pilot and the captain, and notes that its radar resolution was [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] actually a container ship, and the fuel on board was solely for the purpose of running the ship. http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/ The Coast Guard blames the pilot and the captain, and notes that its radar resolution was [...]

]]> By: Oil Tanker San Francisco - Dogpile Web Search http://gcaptain.com/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/?764#comment-3693 Oil Tanker San Francisco - Dogpile Web Search Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:45:48 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/#comment-3693 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] On Fuel Tank Sponsored by: Fuel-Tank.Click-Research.info/ [Found on Ads by Google] 10. Ship Types 101 - San Francisco Bay Bridge Oil Tanker Collision ... I have been amazed lately by the number of errors in both media reports and political commentary [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] On Fuel Tank Sponsored by: Fuel-Tank.Click-Research.info/ [Found on Ads by Google] 10. Ship Types 101 – San Francisco Bay Bridge Oil Tanker Collision … I have been amazed lately by the number of errors in both media reports and political commentary [...]

]]> By: VTS Warning to Cosco Busan Pilot | gCaptain.com http://gcaptain.com/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/?764#comment-3649 VTS Warning to Cosco Busan Pilot | gCaptain.com Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:31:52 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/#comment-3649 [...] I promised you I wouldn’t correct minor mistakes made by the media so I’ll just offer a gCaptain tshirt to the person who catches the first [...] [...] I promised you I wouldn’t correct minor mistakes made by the media so I’ll just offer a gCaptain tshirt to the person who catches the first [...]

]]> By: Sailor101 http://gcaptain.com/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/?764#comment-3564 Sailor101 Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:03:03 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/#comment-3564 My intention was really to make a jab the sheer volume inbound 'from' China to the U.S.. I am all too aware of where the ship was bound, her crew, her owner, etc.. I live in the Bay Area and it's been nothing but saturation!! :-\ (Of course only by local News since the rest of the country wrote us off years ago;). My intention was really to make a jab the sheer volume inbound ‘from’ China to the U.S.. I am all too aware of where the ship was bound, her crew, her owner, etc.. I live in the Bay Area and it’s been nothing but saturation!! :-\ (Of course only by local News since the rest of the country wrote us off years ago;).

]]> By: captstash http://gcaptain.com/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/?764#comment-3559 captstash Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:20:03 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/#comment-3559 All that complaining about inaccuracies, and you made one yourself. The vessel was headed for Korea, not China! :-) PS: Many newer container ships have the bunker tanks located within a double hull. Don't be surprised to see new legislation requiring that with a similar phas in to what we did for oil tankers. All that complaining about inaccuracies, and you made one yourself. The vessel was headed for Korea, not China! :-)

PS: Many newer container ships have the bunker tanks located within a double hull. Don’t be surprised to see new legislation requiring that with a similar phas in to what we did for oil tankers.

]]> By: Sailor101 http://gcaptain.com/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/?764#comment-13943 Sailor101 Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:03:03 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/ship-types-101-san-francisco-bay-bridge-oil-tanker-collision/#comment-13943 My intention was really to make a jab the sheer volume inbound 'from' China to the U.S.. I am all too aware of where the ship was bound, her crew, her owner, etc.. I live in the Bay Area and it's been nothing but saturation!! :- (Of course only by local News since the rest of the country wrote us off years ago;). My intention was really to make a jab the sheer volume inbound ‘from’ China to the U.S.. I am all too aware of where the ship was bound, her crew, her owner, etc.. I live in the Bay Area and it’s been nothing but saturation!! :- (Of course only by local News since the rest of the country wrote us off years ago;).

]]>