Comments on: Nuclear Submarine Rammed By Navy Cruiser – UPDATE http://gcaptain.com/nuclear-submarine-rammed-navy/ Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:44:19 +0000 hourly 1 By: patrick mckearnan http://gcaptain.com/nuclear-submarine-rammed-navy/#comment-36922 patrick mckearnan Fri, 09 Nov 2012 16:56:54 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=56858#comment-36922 All that $$$ for equipment and training and our naval forces do this. How? why?

]]> By: Charles F. Burns http://gcaptain.com/nuclear-submarine-rammed-navy/#comment-33797 Charles F. Burns Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:31:09 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=56858#comment-33797 Maybe a bit more attention to RULES of the Road and less attention to the dates of commissions in the Blue Book are in order.

A listing of subs prematurely “putting her on the top” would be very amusing…

It could be entitled “Fundamentals….fundamentals…”…they could replace the fliers who have been retiring at the Maritime schools….oh that is right – as soon as the female covers matters are solved…first things first…

C.F. Burns

]]> By: Scourgeofthesevenseas http://gcaptain.com/nuclear-submarine-rammed-navy/#comment-33736 Scourgeofthesevenseas Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:59:52 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=56858#comment-33736 Blue on blue training?!

]]> By: Raymond Wright http://gcaptain.com/nuclear-submarine-rammed-navy/#comment-33728 Raymond Wright Mon, 15 Oct 2012 11:40:22 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=56858#comment-33728 The end of two career officers, unfortunately.

]]> By: John Nichter http://gcaptain.com/nuclear-submarine-rammed-navy/#comment-33724 John Nichter Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:53:21 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=56858#comment-33724 Silly Navy, Trix are for kids.

]]> By: Robert Lindsay http://gcaptain.com/nuclear-submarine-rammed-navy/#comment-33723 Robert Lindsay Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:40:42 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=56858#comment-33723 Did they drug test everyone?

]]> By: Michael Caron http://gcaptain.com/nuclear-submarine-rammed-navy/#comment-33720 Michael Caron Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:31:24 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=56858#comment-33720 Hard right or left in the direction of the subs stern and dead slow followed shortly by emergency full astern.

]]> By: Gary Cordes http://gcaptain.com/nuclear-submarine-rammed-navy/#comment-33719 Gary Cordes Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:04:11 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=56858#comment-33719 Hard right (starboard) or left would prolly have worked,

]]> By: James Knox http://gcaptain.com/nuclear-submarine-rammed-navy/#comment-33718 James Knox Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:26:28 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=56858#comment-33718 Obviously the sub fault. But cruiser should've thrown it full astern, not just put it in neutral. Glad no one was hurt

]]> By: Mac Mccrodden http://gcaptain.com/nuclear-submarine-rammed-navy/#comment-33716 Mac Mccrodden Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:55:01 +0000 http://gcaptain.com/?p=56858#comment-33716 In my experience, I have noticed that the NAVY is not real strong on Navrules.

]]>