gCaptain.com

A Blog About Ships

Fastream Maritime Leaderboard



World’s Largest Non-Nuclear Explosion

May 13th, 2008 · Comments

Ernie’s Place brings us the world’s largest Non-Nuclear explosion:

Alaska along the coast of British Columbia, there is what is known as the inland passage to Alaska. The surge through the passage is one of the strongest ocean currents in the world. In the middle of this passage is a place called “Seymour Narrows” where the water swirls so strongly that it has been known to suck boats down into the abyss. Sailors dread the passage and even the largest ship has to wait for the right conditions to make a passage.

In the middle of those narrows was a rock called “Ripple Rock” That had two sharp peaks that stuck up to about nine feet below the surface. Just the right depth to gut even the mightiest ship. It sunk 119 ships and killed 114 people. On April 5th 1958 they blew the rock out of the water with the worlds largest non-nuclear explosion. Its’ worth the time to load and watch the clip. To make it full screen click on the Snowflake looking symble in the lower right corner. It will go back to normal when it ends. The End of Ripple Rock

Video at the end of this post.

(Thanks Larry)

CORRECTION:

Reader Jeremy corrcted our title. Here is information on the World’s Largest Non-Nuclear Explosion (Luck for us it’s still maritime related):

Port Chicago Explosion

USMM.org tells us:

During World War II, one of the sources of ammunition for the Pacific Theater was the Naval Ammunition Depot at Port Chicago, California. Port Chicago is located on an arm of San Francisco Bay about 30 miles northeast of Oakland and San Francisco. The town of Port Chicago, population 1,500, was located about 1.5 miles from the pier. Not far away was Vallejo’s Mare Island, a major Naval Base which included ammunition depots.

On the evening of July 17, 1944 there were two ships being loaded at the pier. The Liberty ship SS E.A. Bryan, after 4 days of loading, had about 4,600 tons of ammunition and explosives on board; 98 black enlisted men continued work. On board the ship were 31 U.S. Merchant Marine crew and 13 Naval Armed Guard.

Docked at the pier since 6 PM that evening was the SS Quinault Victory being loaded by about 100 black men for its maiden voyage. On board were 36 crew and 17 Armed Guard. A Coast Guard fire barge was also moored at the pier. Besides 430 tons of bombs waiting to be loaded, the pier held a locomotive and 16 boxcars with its crew of three civilians, and a marine sentry.

At 10:18 an Army Air Force plane flying at 9,000 feet saw pieces of white hot metal, some as large as a house, fly straight up past them. According to the co-pilot, the “fireworks display” lasted about one minute. The explosion was heard 200 miles away.

More information can be found at USMM.org and HERE. Photos from the day can be found HERE.

 
icon for podpress  LArgest Non-nuclear Explosion: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

CommentsTags: · ,

Is Your Equipment Intrinsically Safe?

March 4th, 2008 · Comments

We are still debating whether this guy was using a flashlight, LED or his cell phone to check the level of this tank but we are certain it wasn’t Intrinsically Safe!

 
icon for podpress  Shell Gas Station Explosion [1:51m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

CommentsTags: · , , ,

Incident Photo Of The Week - M/V Hanjin Pennsylvania

December 30th, 2007 · Comments

Hanjin Pennsylvania - Fireworks Ship Fire

After a brief hiatus we return to a popular gCaptain feature “Incident Photo Of The Week“. This weeks photo is the aftermath of a 2002 fire aboard the M/V Hanjin Pennsylvania. The reason for the damage? A container filled with fireworks! CargoLAw.com tells us;

Hanjin Pennsylvania fire “has gutted accommodation & engine room” At least 6 rows of containers on deck & under deck have been effected by the blaze, which is understood to have started in a container carrying fireworks & spread to engulf the area immediately forward of the superstructure. But as the ship continues to burn, and salvage crews are still hampered in their attempts to board the vessel to carry out firefighting operations, experts are already suggesting the likely cause of the explosion was not a container full of fireworks.

CLICK HERE for the dramatic photo of the actual explosion then visit the newly redesigned CargoLaw website for the details; Page 1, Page 2, Page 3

[Continue Reading →]

CommentsTags: · , , , , , , ,

 


Comments


Popular Topics



Sponsors



Maritime and Offshore Recruitment

Spurs

Mariner Taxes Logo

Mariner Taxes

Golden Shellback Logo

Maritime Training





Your Ad Here




Authors



Follow Us



Categories



Recent Posts



Popular

Shipping Archives

Read A Random Story