Error In Navigation – Tracing Paper Blamed

Published: May 25th, 2008 by admin | SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Enjoying the blog?


We welcome you to take the next step and join the community of gCaptain readers by sharing thoughts and opinions on the forum. Click HERE to get started today!



AF36588D-CA3A-40D2-9C3B-B73C9CFFE314.jpg

The Guardian tells us:

A nuclear-powered Royal Navy submarine needed £5m worth of repairs after it struck the seabed because a piece of tracing paper covered its navigational chart, investigators have found.

The tracing paper had been used on the chart to protect it from being written on, obscuring vital information.

HMS Trafalgar was grounded near the Isle of Skye in October 2002 because of basic navigational errors during a training exercise for students, according to the official board of inquiry report, which has been released under a freedom of information request.

According to the report, just 90 seconds before the boat hit the seabed, a crew member realised what was about to happen and was recorded as saying: “We’re going to have to change course. This is too dangerous.”

TSSBP gives us a bit of insight:

To me, this wasn’t really a “training aid”-induced accident; I think all boats used tracing paper over charts when you were staying in the same small area for a long time with lots of maneuvering, whether you were doing PCO Ops or not. All submariners, I’m sure, have good stories about where training aids actually contributed to real-world casualties; unfortunately, all of mine happened back aft, so I can’t talk about them.

While The Lone Voice captures our sentiment in this post:

The involvement of unsupervised student submariners in the navigation procedures and the use of tracing paper on the chart were criticised heavily by the board.

Related Posts:


This blog is sponsored by:




Categories: Incidents · Navigation · Navy

Tags: · , , ,





  • JKB, many thanks for the insight. I'll add the Neptunuslex link to the main article.

    -John
  • JKB
    This comment over at Neptunus Lex (http://www.neptunuslex.com/2008/05/23/penny-wis...) has a link to the report. As the commenter points out the tracing paper was only a small contributer to a series of errors. Other errors were much more significant, such as poor chart work, sailing plan alteration, current miscalculations, etc.

    The transit was planned for periscope depth with fixes but was changed to submerged, at speed. The navigator failed to calculate the currents from fixes and relied on faulty tidal information. They didn't consult pubs that would have pointed out the tidal dangers, but the tracing paper did apparently obscure tidal information on the chart. They also were using soundings and contour crossing to signal the arrival at the turn. However, the board found that soundings in the area were not adequate for navigation. In addition, submarine depth and tidal corrections were misapplied when determining soundings.
  • gertbue
    Charts can be printed with reasonable quality on board ship from ARCS (raster image charts by UKHO for use in ECDIS); one chart per mission. Experience so far demonstrates that this solution highly satisfies mariners.
  • Jimmy
    ^^^^^ Agreed!!!!

    Penny wise Pound foolish
  • tim
    £5m will buy plenty of charts. The tracing paper while saving the chart cost more than it saved.
blog comments powered by Disqus