Ballast Free Ships

Published: October 23rd, 2008 by Richard | SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Enjoying the blog?


We welcome you to take the next step and join the community of gCaptain readers by sharing thoughts and opinions on the forum. Click HERE to get started today!



newballastfr Ballast Free Ships

University of Michigan researchers are investigating a radical new design for cargo ships that would eliminate ballast tanks, the water-filled compartments that enable non-native creatures to sneak into the Great Lakes from overseas.

PhysOrg.com is reporting that an alternative to current and proposed tank cleaning methods.

Here’s an excerpt:

“In some ways, it’s more like a submarine than a surface ship,” Parsons said. “We’re opening part of the hull to the sea, creating a very slow flow through the trunks from bow to stern.

“You’re continuously sweeping water through the ship and out,” he said. “So you’re always filled with local sea water, not hauling water from one part of the world to the other.”

The U-M ballast-free ship concept was conceived in 2001 and patented in 2004. It is intended for new-vessel construction only.

The full PhysOrg.com post is here.

(Ed. note: My guess is that this system could be used for cooling as well. A special thanks to BitterEnd reader Cherei in San Antonio for point me to this post.)

___________________________

bitterend Ballast Free ShipsThis post was written by Richard Rodriguez, Rescue Tug Captain, and US Coast Guard approved instructor for License Training. You can read more of his articles at the BitterEnd of the net.

Related Posts:


This blog is sponsored by:




About The Author
Captain Richard Rodriguez is a US Coast Guard approved instructor based in the San Juan Islands, Washington. Also a Rescue Tug Captain, Richard's posts on his blog "Bitterend" feature Vessel Assist calls that include live tracking of his vessel.
Full Profile: Richard

Categories: Environment · Marine Technology

Tags: · , , , ,





  • John
    "I wonder how frequently other ships have had “incidents” while conducting a ballast exchange?" good question. I can think of at least 2 very close calls.
  • I have heard of this in the past, but the unexpected 7.3% reduction in power from the original ballast, tank bulk carrier is new news and welcome benefit.

    Also, this concept could have prevented relatively recent "Cougar Ace" heel instability and resulting death. Eliminating the machinery related to pumping, filtration, and/or chemical sterilization are certainly advantages, but eliminating the need to disturb your stability while underway will definitely appeals to my KISS principle.

    I wonder how frequently other ships have had "incidents" while conducting a ballast exchange?
blog comments powered by Disqus