<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>gCaptain.com &#187; Mario Vittone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/author/mario/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog</link>
	<description>A Blog About Ships</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:42:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9; </copyright>
		<managingEditor>admin@gcaptain.com ()</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>admin@gcaptain.com()</webMaster>
		<category></category>
		<ttl>1440</ttl>
		<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>A Blog About Ships</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author></itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name></itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>admin@gcaptain.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/feed_images/gCaptain-Anchor-Logo-S.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>The Truth About Cold Water</title>
		<link>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/cold_water/</link>
		<comments>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/cold_water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mario Vittone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime Expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USCG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypothermia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rescue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survival]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/?p=11198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is impossible to die from hypothermia in cold water unless you are wearing flotation.

Despite the research, the experience, and all the data, I still hear “experts” - touting as wisdom - completely false information about cold water and what happens to people who get in it. With another season of really cold water approaching, I feel compelled to get these points across in a way that will change the way mariners behave out there on (or near) the water.

What follows is the truth about cold water and cold water immersion. I know that you think you know this already all there is to know about hypothermia (and maybe you do) but read ahead and see if you aren’t surprised by something.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left"><img class="size-full wp-image-11209 aligncenter" style="margin-top: 10px;margin-bottom: 10px" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/storm.jpg" alt="boat on the cold ocean water" width="383" height="254" title="The Truth About Cold Water" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left">I’m going to come right out and tell you something that almost no one in the maritime industry understands. That includes mariners, executives, managers, insurers, dock workers, for certain &#8211; fisherman, and even many (most) rescue professionals:</p>
<p><strong>It is impossible to die from hypothermia in cold water unless you are wearing flotation, because w</strong><strong>ithout flotation &#8211; you won&#8217;t live long enough to become hypothermic.</strong></p>
<p>Despite the research, the experience, and all the data, I still hear “experts” &#8211; touting as wisdom &#8211; completely false information about cold water and what happens to people who get in it. With another season of really cold water approaching, I feel compelled to get these points across in a way that will change the way mariners behave out there on (or near) the water.</p>
<p>What follows is the truth about cold water and cold water immersion. I know that you think you know all there is to know about hypothermia already (and maybe you do), but read ahead and see if you aren’t surprised by something.</p>
<p>When the water is cold (say under 50 degrees F) there are significant physiological reactions that occur, in order, almost always.</p>
<p><strong>You Can’t Breath:</strong></p>
<p>The first is phase of cold water immersion is called the <strong>cold shock response</strong>: It is a stage of increased heart rate and blood pressure, uncontrolled gasping, and sometimes uncontrolled movement. Lasting anywhere from 30 seconds to a couple of minutes depending on a number of factors, the cold shock response can be deadly all by itself. In fact, of all the people who die in cold water, it is estimated that <strong>20% die in the first two minutes.</strong> They drown, they panic, they take on water in that first uncontrolled gasp, if they have heart problems &#8211; the cold shock may trigger a heart attack. Surviving this stage is about getting your breathing under control, realizing that the stage will pass, and staying calm.<span id="more-11198"></span></p>
<p><strong>You Can’t Swim:</strong></p>
<p>One of the primary reasons given by recreational boaters when asked why they don’t wear a life jacket, is that they can swim. Listen up, Tarzan; I swam for a living for the better part of my adult life, and when the water is cold &#8211; none of us can swim for very long. The second stage of cold water immersion is called <strong>cold incapacitation</strong>. lacking adequate insulation your body will make its own. Long before your core temperature drops a degree, the veins in your extremities (those things you swim with) will constrict,  you will lose your ability control your hands, and the muscles in your arms and legs will just flat out quit working well enough to keep you above water. Without some form of flotation, and in not more than 30 minutes, the best swimmer among us will drown &#8211; definitely &#8211; no way around it. Without ever experiencing a drop in core temperature (at all) over 50% of the people who die in cold water, die from drowning perpetuated by cold incapacitation.</p>
<p><strong>You Last Longer than You Think:</strong></p>
<p>If you have ever heard the phrase, “That water is so cold, you will die from hypothermia within ten minutes.” then you have been lied to about hypothermia. For that matter you can replace ten minutes with twenty, or thirty, or even an hour, and you’ve still been lied to. In most cases, in water of say 40 degrees (all variables to one side), it typically takes a full hour to approach unconsciousness from <strong>hypothermia,</strong> the third stage of cold water immersion.  But remember, you must be wearing flotation to get this far.</p>
<p>We are all different in this regard, but I once spent an hour in 44 degree water wearing street clothes and my core temperature was only down by less than two degrees (I was not clinically hypothermic). It was uncomfortable to be sure, and I wouldn’t recommend finding your own limit, but it probably would have taken another hour to lose consciousness, and an hour after that to cool my core to the point of no return. The bodies efforts to keep the core warm &#8211; vasoconstriction and shivering &#8211; are surprisingly effective. The shivering and blood shunting to the core are so effective, that twenty minutes after jumping in (twice the “you’ll be dead in ten minutes” time), I had a fever of 100.2.</p>
<p><strong>Rescue Professionals Think You Live Longer:</strong></p>
<p>There is a good side to the misconceptions about hypothermia. Should you ever be in the water in need of rescue, you can be certain that the Coast Guard is going to give you the benefit of every possible doubt. When developing search criteria &#8211; search and rescue coordinators use something called the Cold Exposure Survival Model (CESM): It is a program wherein they enter all the available data about the victim (age, weight, estimated body fat, clothing, etc.) and about the environment (water temp, sea state, air temp, wind) and the software spits them out a number that represents the longest possible time you can survive under those conditions. I plugged my own information into it once and it said I could survive for over 4 hours in 38 degree water wearing nothing but a t-shirt and jeans and no flotation. I can tell you from experience that the CESM is full of it &#8211; I’d give me 35 minutes tops &#8211; but the error is comforting. If the program that determines how long I might live is going to be wrong &#8211; I want it to be wrong in that direction.</p>
<p><strong>Out of the Water is Not Out of Trouble:</strong></p>
<p>I lost count of the number of survivors I annoyed in the back of the helicopter because I wouldn&#8217;t let them move.  I had a rule &#8211; if they came from a cold water environment &#8211; they laid down and stayed down until the doctors in the E.R. said they could stand.  It didn&#8217;t matter to me how good they felt or how warm they thought they were.  Because the final killer of cold water immersion is <strong>post-rescue collapse</strong>.  Hypothermia does things besides making everything colder.  Victims are physiologically different for awhile.  One of the things that changes is called heart-rate variability.  The hearts ability to speed up and slow down has been effected.  Getting up and moving around requires your heart to pump more blood, being upright and out of the water is also taxing, then any number of other factors collide and the heart starts to flutter instead of pump &#8211; and down you go.  Victims of immersion hypothermia are two things; lucky to be alive, and fragile.  Until everything is warmed back up &#8211; out of the water and dry is good enough &#8211; mobility comes later.</p>
<p><strong>Did You Learn Anything?:</strong></p>
<p>If you did, then hopefully you&#8217;ll use it to make good decisions when it comes to being safe on and around cold water; good decisions like these:</p>
<ol>
<li>When working on deck, wear flotation.  This includes, especially, all fisherman in Alaska.  I couldn&#8217;t find more recent research, but the 31 Alaskan &#8220;fell overboard&#8221; casualties in 2005 died from drowning, not cold water.  Not one of them was wearing flotation.  Many couldn&#8217;t stay above water long enough for their own boats to make a turn and pick them up&#8230;..over a life jacket.</li>
<li>If you witness a man overboard &#8211; getting the life ring directly to them is critical (vital &#8211; step one &#8211; must do it).  Make certain that all-important piece of safety gear is not just on your vessel, but readily available and not tied to the cradle.</li>
<li>When working on deck &#8211; wear flotation.  I said that already? Well, when I quit reading search reports that end with &#8220;experienced&#8221; mariners dying because they thought they understood cold water &#8211; I&#8217;ll come up with better advice.</li>
</ol>
<p>For more advice about how to handle an accidental immersion into cold water &#8211; please watch<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1xohI3B4Uc"> Cold Water Boot Camp</a> &#8211; it is one of the best 10 minutes on immersion hypothermia ever produced.  For even more advice, ask me a question on the discussion boards.</p>
<p><a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/cold_water/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p><em><strong>disclaimer:</strong></em> The views and opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily those of the Department of Homeland Security or the U.S. Coast Guard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/cold_water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drowning Doesn&#8217;t Look Like Drowning</title>
		<link>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/drowning/</link>
		<comments>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/drowning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 05:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mario Vittone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifesaving Incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/?p=10981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drowning is not the violent, splashing, call for help that most people expect.  In this article, Mario explains what drowning really looks like and how to recognize it when its happening. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_10988" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 435px"><img class="size-full wp-image-10988 " style="border: 5px solid black;margin: 5px" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/iStock_000010025103XSmall.jpg" alt="Drowning?  Not likely." width="425" height="282" title="Drowning Doesnt Look Like Drowning" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Drowning?  Not likely.</p></div>
<p>The new captain jumped from the cockpit, fully dressed, and sprinted through the water. A former lifeguard, he kept his eyes on his victim as he headed straight for the owners who were swimming between their anchored sportfisher and the beach. &#8220;I think he thinks you’re drowning,&#8221; the husband said to his wife. They had been splashing each other and she had screamed but now they were just standing, neck-deep on the sand bar. &#8220;We’re fine, what is he doing?&#8221; she asked, a little annoyed. &#8220;We’re fine!&#8221; the husband yelled, waving him off, but his captain kept swimming hard. &#8221;Move!&#8221; he barked as he sprinted between the stunned owners. Directly behind them, not ten feet away, their nine-year-old daughter was drowning. Safely above the surface in the arms of the captain, she burst into tears, &#8220;Daddy!&#8221;</p>
<p>How did this captain know, from fifty feet away, what the father couldn’t recognize from just ten? Drowning is not the violent, splashing, call for help that most people expect. The captain was trained to recognize drowning by experts and years of experience. The father, on the other hand, had learned what drowning looks like by watching television. If you spend time on or near the water (hint: that’s all of us) then you should make sure that you and your crew knows what to look for whenever people enter the water. Until she cried a tearful, &#8220;Daddy,&#8221; she hadn’t made a sound. As a former Coast Guard rescue swimmer, I wasn’t surprised at all by this story. Drowning is almost always a deceptively quiet event. The waving, splashing, and yelling that dramatic conditioning (television) prepares us to look for, is rarely seen in real life.</p>
<p>The Instinctive Drowning Response &#8211; so named by Francesco A. Pia, Ph.D.,  is what people do to avoid actual or perceived suffocation in the water.  And it does not look like most people expect.  There is very little splashing, no waving, and no yelling or calls for help of any kind.  To get an idea of just how quiet and undramatic from the surface drowning can be, consider this:  It is the number two cause of accidental death in children, age 15 and under (just behind vehicle accidents) &#8211; of the approximately 750 children who will drown next year, about 375 of them will do so within 25 yards of a parent or other adult. <strong> In ten percent of those drownings, the adult will actually watch them do it, having no idea it is happening</strong> (source: CDC).  Drowning does not look like drowning &#8211; Dr. Pia, in an article in the Coast Guard&#8217;s On Scene Magazine, described the instinctive drowning response like this:<span id="more-10981"></span></p>
<blockquote>
<ol>
<li>Except in rare circumstances, drowning people are physiologically unable to call out for help. Th e respiratory system was designed for breathing. Speech is the secondary or overlaid function. Breathing must be fulfilled, before speech occurs.</li>
<li>Drowning people’s mouths alternately sink below and reappear above the surface of the water. The mouths of drowning people are not above the surface of the water long enough for them to exhale, inhale, and call out for help. When the drowning people’s mouths are above the surface, they exhale and inhale quickly as their mouths start to sink below the surface of the water.</li>
<li>Drowning people cannot wave for help. Nature instinctively forces them to extend their arms laterally and press down on the water’s surface. Pressing down on the surface of the water, permits drowning people to leverage their bodies so they can lift their mouths out of the water to breathe.</li>
<li>Throughout the Instinctive Drowning Response, drowning people cannot voluntarily control their arm movements. <strong>Physiologically, drowning people who are struggling on the surface of the water cannot stop drowning and perform voluntary movements such as waving for help, moving toward a rescuer, or reaching out for a piece of rescue equipment.</strong></li>
<li>From beginning to end of the Instinctive Drowning Response people’s bodies remain upright in the water, with no evidence of a supporting kick. Unless rescued by a trained lifeguard, these drowning people can only struggle on the surface of the water from 20 to 60 seconds before submersion occurs.</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>(Source: <a href="http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/cg534/On%20Scene/OSFall06.pdf">On Scene Magazine: Fall 2006</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t mean that a person that is yelling for help and thrashing isn&#8217;t in real trouble &#8211; they are experience aquatic distress. Not always present before the instinctive drowning response, aquatic distress doesn&#8217;t last long &#8211; but unlike true drowning, these victims can still assist in there own rescue.  They can grab lifelines, throw rings, etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Look for these other signs of drowning when persons are n the water:</p>
<ul>
<li>Head low in the water, mouth at water level</li>
<li>Head tilted back with mouth open</li>
<li>Eyes glassy and empty, unable to focus</li>
<li>Eyes closed</li>
<li>Hair over forehead or eyes</li>
<li>Not using legs &#8211; Vertical</li>
<li>Hyperventilating or gasping</li>
<li>Trying to swim in a particular direction but not making headway</li>
<li>Trying to roll over on the back</li>
<li>Ladder climb, rarely out of the water.</li>
</ul>
<p>So if a crew member falls overboard and every looks O.K. &#8211; don&#8217;t be too sure.  Sometimes the most common indication that someone is drowning is that they don&#8217;t look like they&#8217;re drowning.  They may just look like they are treading water and looking up at the deck.  One  way to be sure?  Ask them: &#8220;Are you alright?&#8221; If they can answer at all &#8211; they probably are.  If they return  a blank stare &#8211; you may have less than 30 seconds to get to them.  And parents: children playing in the water make noise.  When they get quiet, you get to them and find out why.</p>
<p>If you have any questions at all &#8211; please post them in the gCaptain forums under <a href="http://gcaptain.com/forum/marine-safety/">&#8220;maritime safety&#8221; </a></p>
<p><em><span style="color: #888888"><strong>disclaimer:</strong> The views and opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily those of the Department of Homeland Security or the U.S. Coast Guard</span>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/drowning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>406 EPIRBS are Digital, Right?</title>
		<link>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/406-epirbs-are-digital-right/</link>
		<comments>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/406-epirbs-are-digital-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mario Vittone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USCG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epirb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/?p=5972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little, Sort Of.

 

Back on February 1st 2009, though boat owners and ship riders didn’t hear it, there were celebrations all over the rescue world as the COSPAS-SARSAT system stopped processing and reporting 121.5 distress signals. The hours of lost sleep spent chasing after ghost 121.5 EPIRB signals that were actually some other transmitter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A little, Sort Of.</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_6188" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 360px"><img class="size-full wp-image-6188" src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/sats.gif" alt="image provided courtesy of Cospas-Sarsat" width="350" height="180" title=" 406 EPIRBS are Digital, Right?" /><p class="wp-caption-text">image provided courtesy of Cospas-Sarsat</p></div>
<dl>
<dt> </dt>
</dl>
<p class="MsoNormal">Back on February 1<sup>st</sup> 2009, though boat owners and ship riders didn’t hear it, there were celebrations all over the rescue world as the <a href="http://www.cospas-sarsat.org">COSPAS-SARSAT</a> system stopped processing and reporting 121.5 distress signals.<span> </span>The hours of lost sleep spent chasing after ghost 121.5 EPIRB signals that were actually some other transmitter (like a radio tower or an ATM machine…seriously) is beyond measure. While I appreciated racking up flight hours on the government’s dime; the Coast Guard, along with SAR organizations the world over, have turned a lot of fuel into noise searching for….well…nothing.<span> </span>Only one out of fifty 121.5 alerts have been genuine distress situations.<span> </span>An end to all that warrants at least a little celebration. But even as the date came and went and the chatter about the switch increased – the first problem with the 406 EPIRBs is already showing itself:<span> </span>news release after news release touts the 406 as the “digital” beacon; more powerful, no-waiting, and accurate to just a few yards. <span> </span>The problem is that none of that is completely true – not mostly – and only sort-of. And since recreational boaters and professional mariners are making purchasing decisions about the things, and they are lifesaving devices, I wanted to clear a few things up about the “able-to-leap-buildings-in-a-single bound” 406. <span id="more-5972"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>MISNOMER</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Most <strong>E</strong>mergency <strong>P</strong>osition<strong> I</strong>ndicating <strong>R</strong>adio <strong>B</strong>eacons do not actually<strong> “Indicate” </strong>their <strong>“Position.”<span> </span></strong>Without an onboard GPS – your EPIRB, any EPIRB, simply transmits a signal that contains the exact same data regardless of where in the world you happen to be. While the position of a non-GPS enabled 406 is calculated with greater accuracy than the old 121.5 beacons – it is done in exactly the same way – by relaying the analog (that’s right – I said it) 406 signal back down to earth for calculation – just like the 121.5s did.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>It’s About the Birds</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">To understand the real benefits of the 406 you really have to understand the satellites they talk to.<span> </span>The <a href="http://www.cospas-sarsat.org">COSPAS-SARSAT</a> system is made up two very different types of spacecraft:<span> </span><strong>geosynchronous </strong>and<strong> low earth orbiting</strong>.<span> </span>Geosynchronous (synched up with the geography below them) stay fixed above the equator at specific longitudes – looking straight down at the earth below them from around 22,000 miles high – giving them a very wide look at the earth.<span> </span>Low earth orbiting satellites (<a href="http://cospas-sarsat.org/Description/leosarSystem.htm">LEOSAR</a>) travel around the planet at different rates, and because they fly much lower than their geo-synched brothers (between 500 and 550 miles above the earth) they see a much smaller picture of the surface.<span> </span>If all that seems like too much information – the important points are that one kind of satellite orbits the earth, and the other kind stays fixed in space above it.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">One big advantage to the 406 is its ability – with its higher power &#8211; to reach out (22,000 miles into space) and be heard by the <a href="http://www.cospas-sarsat.org/Description/geosarSystem.htm">GEOSAR</a> satellites.<span> </span>You know, the ones way up there above the equator that don’t move and see HUGE pieces of the earth. <span> </span>Positioned around the globe so they can see everything<a href="http://cospas-sarsat.org/Status/geoCov.htm"> between the 70<sup>th</sup> parallels</a> – these high fliers are the real engine to the 406 machine.<span> </span>Just as soon as these guys hear that 406 MHZ pulse (a half-second long every 50 seconds), encoded with that “digital” information, it immediately retransmits it back down to earth &#8211; including the beacon number and your <strong>exact</strong> latitude and longitude provided by the on-board GPS. The signal also includes your course and speed giving rescuers very accurate – real-time data &#8211; to get straight to you.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Without an On-Board GPS – Everything Changes</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Without GPS data in the pulse, the GEOSAR Satellites – and all that extra power spent sending them a signal – do nothing.<span> </span>Though they hear the signal, you could be anywhere in their massive window on the world so they have no idea where the beacon is coming from.<span> </span>Your super-digital, high-powered 406 just digressed and the LEOSAR’s do all the work.<span> </span>The position of the beacon is determined by <a href="http://www.cospas-sarsat.org/DescriptionOverview/doppler.htm">Doppler shift</a>. As the satellite passes over the beacon (and just as with 121.5s, you may have to wait for it) and hears the 406 MHz signal, it retransmits the signal back to earth to one of forty-five Local User Terminal (<a href="http://cospas-sarsat.org/Description/luts.htm">LUTs</a>) around the earth.<span> </span>Some very serious math in then applied to determine where exactly the beacon is (or was) as the satellite passed overhead. <span> </span>Though much more accurate than the 121.5 signals, and immune to old LEOSAR blind spots, these positions can still be off by as much as 3 miles and may be up to 40 minutes old; older if the satellite picked up the 406 outside the view of a LUT (<a href="http://cospas-sarsat.org/Status/leoCov.htm">see map</a>).<span> </span>And while this is way better than the 121.5 accuracy (up to 12 miles off) and timeliness, you should consider the benefits of the on board GPS 406 over the other varieties before making a decision.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>What 150 Bucks More Gets You:</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I’m not talking about brands; I’m talking about types. So the price difference may be more or less. But given that we are talking about an “emergency” beacon – usually used from the water (meaning your boat is gone) lets just call the price difference “peanuts”: The difference between a 406 with an on board GPS and one without is best expressed this way. You can let the rescuers know where you are – accurate to within yards and including drift data – every 50 seconds; or you can let the rescuers know where you might have been &#8211; accurate to within a few miles – a while ago with a non-GPS 406.<span> </span>Sure, you’ll meet the requirements with the less expensive model, but I promise you won’t miss the extra money sitting (hopefully) in your life raft.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Some readers will notice I haven’t even mentioned the third kind of 406 – the GPS linked variety that use data from your vessels on-board navigation device.<span> </span>It’s a great idea so long as you’re staying with your vessel, and you&#8217;re under power, and the batteries last.  How likely is that in an emergency that requires an EPIRB? If you have to abandon ship, or the ship abandons you, the on board navigation system isn’t coming with you….and neither is accurate GPS data.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if gte mso 10]&gt; &lt;!   /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; 	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; 	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; 	mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	mso-padding-alt:0pt 5.4pt 0pt 5.4pt; 	mso-para-margin:0pt; 	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-ansi-language:#0400; 	mso-fareast-language:#0400; 	mso-bidi-language:#0400;} --> <!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Bottom Line:</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The advantages of global coverage and registration data available with 406 EPIRBS are phenomenal– but consider the following when deciding which type of 406 to purchase:</p>
<ul>
<li>406 EPRIBS are <strong>four times</strong> more accurate than the 121.5 EPIRBS were.<span> </span></li>
<li>406 EPIRBS with on board GPS are<strong> two-hundred times</strong> <a href="http://cospas-sarsat.org/FirstPage/121.5PhaseOut.htm">more accurate</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>So all 406’s are not created equal (not even close) – and if you want the fullest digital advantage available and really want to help rescue crews get more sleep, make sure yours has a GPS.</p>
<p>For more information on the COSPAS-SARSAT System, approved devices, proper beacon registration, and more information about digital and analog signal processing than any one person should know &#8211; visit <a href="http://cospas-sarsat.org/">www.cospas-sarsat.org</a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em><span style="color: #888888;"><strong>disclaimer:</strong> The  views and opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily those of the  Department of Homeland Security or the U.S. Coast Guard</span>.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em>Note: This article was first published in February of 2009<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/406-epirbs-are-digital-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marine Flares &#8211; More Than Meets the Eye</title>
		<link>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/flares-meets-eye/</link>
		<comments>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/flares-meets-eye/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mario Vittone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offshore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USCG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifeboat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maritime safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rescue at sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/?p=8526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Imagine, if you can, the confluence of events that would have to take place to leave you with marine flares being your primary method of signaling distress.  The number of devices that have to fail or become unavailable to you is amazing.  Your radios, GMDSS, SARTS, ERPIRBs, any number of SATCOM devices all have to be down [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/090403-g-8551k-871.jpg" alt="flare training" width="500" title="Marine Flares   More Than Meets the Eye" /></p>
<p>Imagine, if you can, the confluence of events that would have to take place to leave you with <em>marine flares</em> being your primary method of signaling distress.  The number of devices that have to fail or become unavailable to you is amazing.  Your radios, GMDSS, SARTS, ERPIRBs, any number of SATCOM devices all have to be down (or gone) for <em>pyrotechnics</em> to be the best option. The things are the ultimate litmus test for a bad day at sea; i.e. If you ever find yourself launching a flare and you are not practicing, you are definitely having one.  If you find yourself reading the directions on the label then things are much, much worse.</p>
<p>Perhaps because the use of pyrotechnics in an emergency is so rare, there are a lot of misconceptions about the devices, their practicality, and how to best use these &#8220;last ditch&#8221; signals.  Here are some things all mariners should consider before pulling the trigger (or pulling the lanyard, or lever, or&#8230;):<span id="more-8526"></span></p>
<h3>Who is Watching</h3>
<p>Even high flying <em>SOLAS parachute flares</em> of the 1,000 feet variety with burn times of approximately 40 seconds have limits.  Without getting into things like &#8220;apparent horizon&#8221; and &#8220;refraction&#8221; &#8211; at their peak they can be seen 36-37 miles away at the most, and then only for a brief moment.  They may cast a nice red glow beyond that, but not for very long.  The point is that it pays to know how far you are from other ships and what their approximate bearing was before all things went bad.  If another ship was 38 miles away but steaming in your direction, waiting an hour in the lifeboat before launching the flare might be a good idea.  If the nearest ship was 30 miles away and showing you their stern &#8211; you may just want to save those flare. If you ran into trouble fifteen miles off Atlantic City in the Spring I&#8217;d say signal away, their will be dozens of reports of the flare within minutes. Always think about who might be able to see your signal before launching.</p>
<p>These same thoughts apply when you notice searching ships or aircraft:  consider that aviation search assets rarely (if ever) have anyone looking behind them.  You can launch a flare if you only see a flashing light in the sky, but wait until you see a red or green nav light (or both &#8211; that&#8217;s the best angle) and your chances of being seen go way up.  Remember that aircraft always search in a grid pattern of one kind or another; they will turn and that may give them a better widow on your position. (note: please don&#8217;t wait until they are on top of you &#8211; its just bad form to shot down your rescue crew).</p>
<h3>Daytime Safety Signals?</h3>
<p>It says so right on the label &#8211; &#8220;For daytime use&#8221; or &#8220;for daylight distress signaling&#8221; or words to that effect.  And, why not? All they do is put out a bright orange (or red) rail of smoke, so using one them at night would be just plain stupid, right?  Wrong.  That&#8217;s because what they put out isn&#8217;t just orange smoke, it is very hot orange smoke.  Fifty years ago that wouldn&#8217;t have mattered, but again, you should consider who is looking for you.  If it is a modern coast guard on the case, there is a very good chance that searching aircraft are equipped with <a href="http://cgvi.uscg.mil/media/main.php?g2_itemId=74892" target="_blank">FLIR</a> (Forward Looking Infrared).  That hot smoke shows up very (very) well on FLIR devices.   Big swathes of smoke also show up very well on NVGs (Night Vision Goggles) so if they are all you have left, or even if they aren&#8217;t, do not discount daytime signaling devices at night.</p>
<h3>Caution You Wont Find on the Label</h3>
<p>The dripping hot phosphorous put out by hand held flares and smoke devices will obviously burn your skin &#8211; thanks for the warning &#8211; but it will also melt very clean holes in your inflatable life jacket or life raft (I know &#8211; I&#8217;ve done it..oops).  Wind direction and sea state should be part of the equation when figuring out how and when to best use your pyro effectively.</p>
<p><em><span style="color: #888888;"><strong>disclaimer:</strong> The views and opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily those of the Department of Homeland Security or the U.S. Coast Guard</span>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/flares-meets-eye/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
