Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: here's one that doesn't get the discussion it should

  1. #1
    c.captain's Avatar
    c.captain is online now Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    anyplace other than Bayoo LaFlush!
    Posts
    4,547
    Thanks
    526
    Thanked 1,530 Times in 937 Posts

    Default here's one that doesn't get the discussion it should

    Sounding the alarm on U.S.-flag compliance

    May 17, 2012

    By Capt. Eric Christensen

    Alarms are designed to alert the watch that something is amiss with a particular piece of equipment or that a level is too high or too low, and it requires attention. Consider this a high-level alarm for detentions of U.S.-flag vessels.

    Coast Guard analysis of recent actions taken on U.S.-flag vessels by port state control (PSC) authorities overseas indicates an alarming trend in the number of significant deficiencies noted. These deficiencies mainly relate to improper manning, primary lifesaving equipment, engine room fire hazards, structural hull safety, and the inability to verify compliance with international conventions due to missing or non-endorsed documentation such as International Safety Management (ISM) certificates.

    This pattern is illustrative of a decline of registry performance, which has firmly landed the U.S. on the “grey list” in at least one of the regional PSC regimes since 2008. This status is indicative of an average performance over the preceding three years and signifies the necessity to implement immediate corrective action. As a result of “grey list” categorization, U.S.-flagged vessels are subject to increased PSC scrutiny and examination frequency. Compounded with the results from Coast Guard and class oversight efforts, multiple substandard conditions have been identified and attributed to habitual offenders indicative of a flawed safety management culture.

    The objectives of SOLAS Chapter IX and the ISM Code are to ensure safety at sea, prevent injury or loss of life, and to avoid environmental and property damage. ISM Code requirements outline processes of communication, training, and actions to continuously maintain the ship in a state of compliance with the applicable safety and environmental protection regulations. Specifically, the code seeks to develop a “safety culture” which addresses human error and human omissions.

    To accomplish its objectives, the code requires owners and operators who have assumed responsibility for their respective vessels, to implement safety management systems (SMS) for their companies and ships. The ability to implement an effective SMS and to foster a “safety culture” throughout all levels of the organization requires a staunch commitment from the upper echelons of management, to the international standards for the safe management and operations of ships.

    In an effort to address the decline in statutory and international convention compliance of the U.S. fleet, the Coast Guard has initiated a campaign focused on holding repeat offenders accountable by targeting the company SMS for increased oversight and compliance verification at the management level.

    In a recent case, objective evidence of continued non-compliance with the requirements of the ISM Code, applicable international conventions, and flag state regulations as well as a systemic failure to adequately implement company policies and procedures led to the first-ever revocation and cancellation of a U.S. company’s ISM Document of Compliance (DOC). A review of attendance reports, documented by various authorities including port and flag states, clearly established a pattern of habitual disregard for rules and regulations. There was also a repetitive inability of the company to implement effective corrective action, both indicative of an ineffective SMS.

    The Coast Guard is asking U.S.-flag vessel owners and operators to take the steps necessary to mitigate the detention of vessels overseas. Verifying that vessels meet applicable requirements under SOLAS and that crews are compliant with STCW in advance of foreign voyages and port calls can go a long way toward improving our international standing.

    The Coast Guard stands ready to assist vessels owners and operators in this compliance effort. Please contact your local sector, Marine Safety Unit or detachment with questions.

    Capt. Eric Christensen is chief, Commercial Vessel Compliance at U.S. Coast Guard headquarters in Washington, D.C. He oversees vessel inspection policy development for over 12,000 U.S.-flag vessels, 8,800 foreign vessels under the Port State Control Program, uninspected vessels, and mariner credentialing policy for 200,000 U.S. merchant mariners. At Coast Guard headquarters he was previously assigned to the Office of Merchant Vessel Inspections where he served as the project officer who developed the Final Rule for Small Passenger Vessel Inspection, ISM Code Compliance Policy for Small Passenger Vessels, and the Streamline Inspection Program.
    So who is the mystery company he mentions? Gotta be TAL!

    On 31 March 2010, industry journal Tradewinds reported that Baffin Strait was the first vessel ever to be involuntarily disenrolled from the United States Coast Guard's Alternative Compliance Program, in which the Coast Guard delegates inspections and certificate issuance to the vessel's classification society. The move was prompted by deficiencies to the ship's firefighting and lifesaving programs reported by Coast Guard inspectors in Singapore remaining unresolved. According to the Coast Guard's program manager for domestic vessel inspections, inspectors "didn't see a pattern of improvement over time".
    Of course, this is all very true and the first clown who comes on here and says that the US fleet is the best will get my pointed stick clean through his empty head!


    .
    Last edited by c.captain; May 17th, 2012 at 04:14 PM.
    Share on Facebook

  2. #2
    Kennebec Captain's Avatar
    Kennebec Captain is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    995
    Thanks
    312
    Thanked 444 Times in 255 Posts

    Default Re: here's one that doesn't get the discussion it should

    Quote Originally Posted by c.captain View Post
    the first clown who comes on here and says that the US fleet is the best will get my pointed stick clean through his empty head!
    Are you kidding - I was scanning it to see if my name was on there somewhere.

    (If my ship owner is reading this I'm kidding)

    K.C.
    Share on Facebook

  3. #3
    c.captain's Avatar
    c.captain is online now Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    anyplace other than Bayoo LaFlush!
    Posts
    4,547
    Thanks
    526
    Thanked 1,530 Times in 937 Posts

    Default Re: here's one that doesn't get the discussion it should

    I mean just look at TAL's logo and tell me what you see!



    Holy effing Christ! What on earth is going on inside the mind of Gudmundor Gyveltafysh to have a company logo that is a flacid penis in front of the US flag?

    I pray it is his little shitstain of a company that got its DOC yanked! Oh please tell me it is so...send me a sign from the heavens with the news!


    .
    Last edited by c.captain; May 18th, 2012 at 04:55 AM.
    Share on Facebook

  4. #4
    New3M's Avatar
    New3M is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    670
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked 26 Times in 21 Posts

    Default

    But the US fleet is the best! Our ships cost the most to build that must mean something...
    Share on Facebook

  5. #5
    Fraqrat's Avatar
    Fraqrat is online now Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    1,071
    Thanks
    640
    Thanked 809 Times in 378 Posts

    Default

    Man hard to believe all those unlimited tonnage Gods couldn't keep their ship compliant.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Share on Facebook

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Fraqrat For This Useful Post:

    Bayrunner (May 17th, 2012)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2