Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 45

Thread: Bad News for future DPOs

  1. #1
    cajuntugster's Avatar
    cajuntugster is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    louisiana
    Posts
    155
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts

    Default Bad News for future DPOs

    The Nautical Institute has moved up a requirement to document actual DP time in addition to the book. Looks like they are going to require 180 days of actual desk time now, this became effective July 1 2011.


    From: Greg Szczurek
    Sent: Thu 7/7/2011 3:11 PM
    To: Falck Alford - Houston Marine Office
    Subject: Changes in DP qualification process


    Effective July 1, 2011 the Nautical Institute is requiring applicants to submit a service letter in addition to the logbook to document their DP time. That’s not a big deal for our students or companies, except that the policy (attached) announcing the requirement states that the letter must “Confirm the total time and hours the applicant has performed as a DP Operator.”

    Until now the Nautical Institute has accepted time stated in days, so even though a supply boat may be in DP operations only a portion of a day the person got credit for the entire day. Recognizing that, the NI has been discussing ways to count time by hours without penalizing situations where a vessel is on DP only part of a day. The attached requirement seems to be more than a bit premature. I’m going to point that out to the Nautical Institute and ask for some clarification and accommodation.

    Please pass this along to companies who have been sending students to DP courses.

    <table style="border: currentColor; border-collapse: collapse;" class="yiv518893635MsoNormalTable" border="1" cellSpacing="0" cellPadding="0"><tbody><tr style="height: 26.75pt;"><td style="padding: 0in 5.4pt; border: currentColor; width: 11.8pt; height: 26.75pt;" vAlign="top" width="16">

    </td></tr></tbody></table>

    Greg Szczurek
    Manager, Curriculum Development
    Share on Facebook

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    East Village of New York City
    Age
    48
    Posts
    466
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 37 Times in 27 Posts

    Default re: Bad News for future DPOs

    good. its about time. im tired of all the BS DP operators out there: lets have a rigidly controlled standard. i would actually like to see the NI give this up and pass the reins to STCW.
    "Better to remain silent and thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt."
    Abraham Lincoln, 16th President (1809-1865)
    Share on Facebook

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to richard8000milesaway For This Useful Post:

    c.captain (July 23rd, 2011)

  4. #3
    Flyer69 is online now Old Salt
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Maine
    Age
    45
    Posts
    237
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts

    Default re: Bad News for future DPOs

    The NI would never give this up without a hell of a fight.
    They have too much invested in it, and I imagine it is paying off for them.
    And, isnt the USCG making noises about getting involved as well with the adoption of the Manila Amendments?
    Let them who know not how to pray, go to sea.
    Share on Facebook

  5. #4
    skycowboy's Avatar
    skycowboy is offline Old Salt
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    325
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 53 Times in 35 Posts

    Default re: Bad News for future DPOs

    Of course they change it, I start school on Monday
    If you hear me yell "Eject,"Eject Eject. the last two will be echos. If you stop to ask why? you'll be talking to yourself, because by then you'll be the Pilot
    Share on Facebook

  6. #5
    PR-9's Avatar
    PR-9 is offline Old Salt
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    244
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by richard8000milesaway
    good. its about time. im tired of all the BS DP operators out there: lets have a rigidly controlled standard. i would actually like to see the NI give this up and pass the reins to STCW.
    Everything the USCG gets involved with becomes a problem!! They never give you a straight answer! I believe it should stay the way it is!! (Not that anyone cares what I believe!)
    Share on Facebook

  7. #6
    Miek is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    18
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    I wonder how many new dpo's where created last year in the gom when most boats where secure at the dock I know for fact people where using dock time for their dp log books. It's sad it's coming to this but most people will take the easy route if left to there own means. I believe the proposed changes are needed.
    Share on Facebook

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Miek For This Useful Post:

    c.captain (July 30th, 2011)

  9. #7
    chemcarrier is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Chipley,Fl
    Posts
    86
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts

    Default re: Bad News for future DPOs

    I believe the NI is slow to make changes to their program, but so far it has worked out ok. No matter what someone is going to slip through every program. There should be no such thing as a DPO who does not now how to manually drive the vessel he or she is operating on DP. Although that is already happening the Ni is addressing the problem. Of course I cannot speak for all vessels I am speaking from an OSV standpoint only.
    Share on Facebook

  10. #8
    PR-9's Avatar
    PR-9 is offline Old Salt
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    244
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Miek
    I wonder how many new dpo's where created last year in the gom when most boats where secure at the dock I know for fact people where using dock time for their dp log books. It's sad it's coming to this but most people will take the easy route if left to there own means. I believe the proposed changes are needed.
    Well I am sure you are right lots of DPOs created with dock time!! The same way everyone upgraded and renew licenses with DOCK time!! The same way DPOs in drilling rigs and drill ships get sea time when they are standing a fake navigational watch.
    With time everyone get a few days that they truly don't deserved. It's part of it.
    Share on Facebook

  11. #9
    Jemplayer's Avatar
    Jemplayer is online now Old Salt
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Austin TX
    Age
    29
    Posts
    447
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked 43 Times in 33 Posts

    Default re: Bad News for future DPOs

    NI needs to have you write out an essay about the first time you had the boat drive off from you while on DP while pumping and how what you did to regain control. I.E go into joystick and the back into DP, Into manually and then DP, or just into manual and just stayed there.

    Granted you would have to have a basic level of writing comprehensions, but you can't call your self a DP operator until you've had to pull your underwear out your ass when something like that.
    Getting straight with Nate, because apparently getting right means your going to have to retake Nav Gen
    Share on Facebook

  12. #10
    Skoidat69's Avatar
    Skoidat69 is online now gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
    Age
    31
    Posts
    87
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts

    Default re: Bad News for future DPOs

    Quote Originally Posted by PR-9 View Post
    The same way DPOs in drilling rigs and drill ships get sea time when they are standing a fake navigational watch. .
    Can you explain for me how a DPO on a drillship is standing a "Fake" navigational watch?
    I due believe that collision avoidance, updating charts and pubs would make what i do a navigational watch. Next you are going to say that mariners work onboard vessels in Diego Garcia aren't real mariners because they ship at anchor for months on end. most of us are professional mariners and goto sea to put greenbacks in the checking account.
    Strippers changed my life- Brad Pitt
    Share on Facebook

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Skoidat69 For This Useful Post:

    stevefoster (July 28th, 2011)

  14. #11
    anchorman is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mobile, AL
    Posts
    1,648
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked 173 Times in 109 Posts

    Default re: Bad News for future DPOs

    I thought I was going to read bad news in here
    "Captain standard operating procedure for decision making is to do what feels right to you at the time, and then to give logical sounding justifications for what you were already going to do anyway" -
    Share on Facebook

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to anchorman For This Useful Post:

    stevefoster (July 28th, 2011)

  16. #12
    anchorman is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mobile, AL
    Posts
    1,648
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked 173 Times in 109 Posts

    Default re: Bad News for future DPOs

    Quote Originally Posted by Skoidat69 View Post
    Can you explain for me how a DPO on a drillship is standing a "Fake" navigational watch?
    I due believe that collision avoidance, updating charts and pubs would make what i do a navigational watch. Next you are going to say that mariners work onboard vessels in Diego Garcia aren't real mariners because they ship at anchor for months on end. most of us are professional mariners and goto sea to put greenbacks in the checking account.
    You didn't do yourself any justice with that post. Updating charts and pubs is not considered navigation watch duties. If you hit something or something hits you....and you happen to say I was correcting charts....you might as well throw your license off the bridge wing.
    "Captain standard operating procedure for decision making is to do what feels right to you at the time, and then to give logical sounding justifications for what you were already going to do anyway" -
    Share on Facebook

  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to anchorman For This Useful Post:

    chemcarrier (July 25th, 2011), salt'n steel (July 25th, 2011)

  18. #13
    PR-9's Avatar
    PR-9 is offline Old Salt
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    244
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skoidat69

    Can you explain for me how a DPO on a drillship is standing a "Fake" navigational watch?
    I due believe that collision avoidance, updating charts and pubs would make what i do a navigational watch. Next you are going to say that mariners work onboard vessels in Diego Garcia aren't real mariners because they ship at anchor for months on end. most of us are professional mariners and goto sea to put greenbacks in the checking account.
    Collision Avoidance!!! Hahahaha you s/by on location with the RAM lights on and a 500m zone!! Everyone avoids you! Come on be real!!

    And NO if you saw the post I was answering, he was saying that dock time should not count for the DP days(I believe he must be a drill ship guy, they are always trying to say that the boat guys don't have a full day of DP because of the dock time and transit time) so I said everyone will get questionable days for DPO or license.

    By the way I am not trying to hate. But you know that your actual transit time and day to day collision avoidance is minimal. Just like my DP time is minimal. I am just been real!!!
    Share on Facebook

  19. #14
    Miek is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    18
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    I don't believe anyone can call themselves a competent DPO without spending some time at the console on DP it's easy to reed a book it's a little different when you have a diver over the side and you make a poor decision. Why did the CG start using assessments apparently just a open book test wasn't enough.
    Share on Facebook

  20. #15
    anchorman is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mobile, AL
    Posts
    1,648
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked 173 Times in 109 Posts

    Default re: Bad News for future DPOs

    Quote Originally Posted by Miek View Post
    it's easy to reed a book.
    Not with that spelling.
    "Captain standard operating procedure for decision making is to do what feels right to you at the time, and then to give logical sounding justifications for what you were already going to do anyway" -
    Share on Facebook

  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to anchorman For This Useful Post:

    Capt. Fran (July 30th, 2011), Flyer69 (July 26th, 2011)

  22. #16
    Jemplayer's Avatar
    Jemplayer is online now Old Salt
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Austin TX
    Age
    29
    Posts
    447
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked 43 Times in 33 Posts

    Default re: Bad News for future DPOs

    My transit time should count as DP time as my auto pilot is run by my DP computer. So technically I'm in DP just using auto heading.
    Getting straight with Nate, because apparently getting right means your going to have to retake Nav Gen
    Share on Facebook

  23. #17
    PR-9's Avatar
    PR-9 is offline Old Salt
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    244
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jemplayer
    My transit time should count as DP time as my auto pilot is run by my DP computer. So technically I'm in DP just using auto heading.
    Very True!!! I didn't think about that one!!!
    Share on Facebook

  24. #18
    c.captain's Avatar
    c.captain is online now Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    anyplace other than Bayoo LaFlush!
    Posts
    1,523
    Thanks
    127
    Thanked 217 Times in 152 Posts

    Default Re: Bad News for future DPOs

    Quote Originally Posted by PR-9 View Post
    Very True!!! I didn't think about that one!!!
    WRONG, NOT TRUE! Running on auto pilot mode is not DP time..Making an in-field move or using follow track mode is DP but auto pilot function is only that...nothing more or less. All you are doing is maintaining a heading. The two are not the same hence why all vessels have autopilots including non DP ones. It is a tool used to help get you there without having to steer the whole way. You must be maintaining a position in some sense for any vessel to be "on DP".

    Sounds to me that you're just trying to game the system...no shame to get that piece of paper. Whatever it takes and damn everything else.
    Last edited by c.captain; July 27th, 2011 at 06:20 PM.
    Share on Facebook

  25. #19
    PR-9's Avatar
    PR-9 is offline Old Salt
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    244
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by c.captain

    WRONG, NOT TRUE! Running on auto pilot mode is not DP time..Making an in-field move or using follow track mode is DP but auto pilot function is only that...nothing more or less. All you are doing is maintaining a heading. The two are not the same hence why all vessels have autopilots including non DP ones. It is a tool used to help get you there without having to steer the whole way. You must be maintaining a position in some sense for any vessel to be "on DP".

    Sounds to me that you're just trying to game the system...no shame to get that piece of paper. Whatever it takes and damn everything else.
    Actually I had have mine for some time! I have plenty of DP days! (actual days on DP).

    The point I am trying to bring is that every one wants to argue the point of the dock time but no one wants to here that when it comes to your actual USCG license. If dock days count for sea days then dock days should count for DP days. If a guy that sits in a DP platform is allowed to upgrade his license (or a guy sitting at anchor in Diego Garcia) then a boat guy (50-50 time transit and DP) should get DP days for every day onboard.
    Share on Facebook

  26. #20
    anchorman is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mobile, AL
    Posts
    1,648
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked 173 Times in 109 Posts

    Default Re: Bad News for future DPOs

    Quote Originally Posted by PR-9 View Post
    Actually I had have mine for some time! I have plenty of DP days! (actual days on DP).

    The point I am trying to bring is that every one wants to argue the point of the dock time but no one wants to here that when it comes to your actual USCG license. If dock days count for sea days then dock days should count for DP days. If a guy that sits in a DP platform is allowed to upgrade his license (or a guy sitting at anchor in Diego Garcia) then a boat guy (50-50 time transit and DP) should get DP days for every day onboard.
    Not a very good point to make. You only get DP time while on DP - period. Your actual USCG license and the sea-time you get, in large part is based on cargo operations that must take place while moored. No cargo, no need to go to sea. Dock operations are on the test for that same USCG license. Remember? That experience counts because it must, but there is a limit. You're not going to see Auto-pilot in Advanced DP or have a space in the logbook from NI. If you are on a vessel while on DP, you are considered underway (this goes for everyone), and meets the legal definition.
    Boat guys never do high risk DP, on occasion it happens, but not normally, meaning that you have the option to go to manual if needed - default for the boat guys. That is not an option on MODU's.
    Just remember, most drilling companies have preconceived notions about "boat people", just for the logic you posted. There are many good personnel that got unlimited licenses and went to drilling and had to fight the stereotype that you so eloquently reiterated for the drill ship Captains that read here.
    "Captain standard operating procedure for decision making is to do what feels right to you at the time, and then to give logical sounding justifications for what you were already going to do anyway" -
    Share on Facebook

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2