Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 34

Thread: New twist in stricken rig saga: Shell was moving it to avoid tax

  1. #1
    SaltAir is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cape Breton
    Posts
    12
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default New twist in stricken rig saga: Shell was moving it to avoid tax

    Share on Facebook

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to SaltAir For This Useful Post:

    Sweat-n-Grease (January 5th, 2013)

  3. #2
    c.captain's Avatar
    c.captain is online now Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    anyplace other than Bayoo LaFlush!
    Posts
    6,354
    Thanks
    797
    Thanked 2,345 Times in 1,424 Posts

    Default Re: New twist in stricken rig saga: Shell was moving it to avoid tax

    love it! What a bunch...they deserve their misery!


    New twist in stricken rig saga: Shell was moving it to avoid tax

    Tom Bawden

    Friday 04 January 2013


    Shell’s ill-fated attempt to tow an offshore oil rig from Alaska to Seattle in the final days of December was motivated by a desire to avoid $7m (£4.3m) of Alaskan state taxes, it emerged today.

    But the oil giant will instead suffer a multi-million dollar loss on the exercise after the rig ran aground off the Alaskan coast on Monday night.

    The rig was beached during a violent storm on its way to a Seattle shipyard for routine maintenance, in a round-trip timed so that, thanks to an accounting loophole, Shell could avoid an Alaskan state tax.

    However, because the rig ran aground late on New Year’s Eve and began 2013 within three miles of the Alaskan coast, Shell remains liable for a unique state property tax on equipment dedicated to oil and gas development and exploration.

    Shell admitted today that its decision to move the rig, the Kulluk, just weeks after it was brought to the Gulf of Alaska in November, was motivated by financial considerations.

    “It’s fair to say that the current tax structure related to vessels of the type influenced the timing of our departure. It would have cost Shell multiple millions to keep the rigs here,” a Shell spokesman said.

    Another Shell spokesman, in London, said: “While we are aware of the tax environment wherever we operate, the driver for operational decisions is always governed by safety. In this case, what mattered most to Shell was the two-week window of favourable weather that was forecasted for that journey.”

    He denied suggestions that the routine maintenance and inspection could have been carried out in Alaska.

    David Gregory, a councillor for the city of Unalaska, said Shell’s equipment tax bill would come to between $6m and $7m, adding: “Maybe they should have just stayed there.”

    In addition to the tax, Shell faces millions of dollars of charges including the cost of repairs. It must also reimburse the federal and state governments for an emergency response which involved more than 500 people, including the evacuation of the rig’s crew of 18 by Coast Guard helicopters in weather the Captain later described as “close to a hurricane”.

    Salvage experts flown to the rig concluded that none of the 139,000 gallons of diesel and 12,000 gallons of hydraulic fluids on board had been spilled. However, they cautioned that it was unclear how serious the damage was or how long it would take to refloat and move the Kulluk.

    For Shell, the incident is the latest in a series of setbacks in its costly pursuit of oil in the environmentally-sensitive Arctic region which is nonetheless regarded as the next great frontier for oil exploration.

    The Kulluk began its journey on 21 December and a week later was about 50 miles south of Kodiak Island – out of reach of the Alaskan tax man.

    But the tug that was pulling it suffered multiple engine failures just as a subtropical cyclone made its way into the North Pacific. On Monday night, in the dying hours of 2012, the rig ran aground about 1,600 feet from Sitkalidak Island, next door to Kodiak.

    Shell has so far spent £3.2bn buying up leases and on exploratory drilling off Alaska’s north and north-west coasts but has yet to discover any commercial quantities of oil. Full-scale production in the region is still thought to be years away.

    Shell shareholders...please demand Peter Slaiby's head on a pike! HE MUST BE FIRED IMMEDIATELY
    Share on Facebook

  4. #3
    Sweat-n-Grease's Avatar
    Sweat-n-Grease is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Victor, Montana
    Posts
    2,079
    Thanks
    1,493
    Thanked 1,047 Times in 620 Posts

    Default Re: New twist in stricken rig saga: Shell was moving it to avoid tax

    Well Well Well - One cat just jumped out of the bag.
    Remember this post:
    An old Sea Captain (a man who experienced WWII) mentioned to a few of us who joined him in a honky-tonk tavern in a foreign sea port, "Men, before you call it an accident, see if there is a who or what benefitting."
    ~ the road goes on forever and the party never ends ~
    Share on Facebook

  5. #4
    fullbell is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    86
    Thanks
    138
    Thanked 19 Times in 15 Posts

    Default

    Hmmm. Pressure from the office? Kind of like what happened with the Bounty disaster.
    Share on Facebook

  6. #5
    Kingrobby is online now Old Salt
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Tacoma, Wa
    Age
    35
    Posts
    318
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked 73 Times in 37 Posts

    Default Re: New twist in stricken rig saga: Shell was moving it to avoid tax

    I don't really understand why this is a big deal. Hundreds of companies move businesses to avoid taxes, bank offshore to avoid taxes, register vessels with flags of convenience to avoid having to pay higher wages, etc. Plus, far more devious things.

    According to another post the Alaskan statute that the tax comes from has been around for awhile and has always been public knowledge. It's not like Shell was secretly trying to avoid the tax. Also, it was a foregone conclusion and reality for those involved in the venture that both vessels would be coming back to shipyards outside of Alaska after the season ended.
    Ship Engines - http://www.flickr.com/photos/robbynorman/sets/72157603921324598/
    Ships around the World - http://www.flickr.com/photos/robbynorman/sets/72157606763159635/
    Share on Facebook

  7. #6
    Tuglyfe33's Avatar
    Tuglyfe33 is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    28
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingrobby
    I don't really understand why this is a big deal. Hundreds of companies move businesses to avoid taxes, bank offshore to avoid taxes, register vessels with flags of convenience to avoid having to pay higher wages, etc. Plus, far more devious things.

    According to another post the Alaskan statute that the tax comes from has been around for awhile and has always been public knowledge. It's not like Shell was secretly trying to avoid the tax. Also, it was a foregone conclusion and reality for those involved in the venture that both vessels would be coming back to shipyards outside of Alaska after the season ended.
    Putting lives in danger and the potential loss of multiple million dollar vessels is not the same thing as banking in the Caymans or hanging a flag of convenience.
    Share on Facebook

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Tuglyfe33 For This Useful Post:

    Sweat-n-Grease (January 8th, 2013)

  9. #7
    Fraqrat's Avatar
    Fraqrat is online now Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    1,312
    Thanks
    1,176
    Thanked 1,105 Times in 494 Posts

    Default

    This just keeps getting better and better.
    Share on Facebook

  10. #8
    tugsailor is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,995
    Thanks
    730
    Thanked 837 Times in 467 Posts

    Default Re: New twist in stricken rig saga: Shell was moving it to avoid tax

    Alaska does not have any personal state income or sales taxes. There is a small local option sales tax collected by some cities, e.g., Kodiak and Fairbanks. There is a modest state corporate income tax on "c" corporations. Just about all of Alaska's state tax revenue comes from oil and gas severance taxes and equipment taxes of one sort or another.

    If Alaska is going bear the environmental risks and social costs of oil drilling, at least they are smart enough to get some tax revenue out of it.

    Shell should have been a good corporate citizen and just paid the damn tax. $7 million is peanuts compared to the $5 billion they have spent so far on this project.

    You watch, Shell's next tax fight with the State of Alaska will be over whether they should pay the tax based upon the pre-grounding value of KULLUK, or whether they should pay much less (probably nothing) based upon KULLUK's post-grounding value. Shell will spend millions on legal fees litigating this issue for years before they will pay Alaska one dime of that tax.
    Share on Facebook

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to tugsailor For This Useful Post:

    Traitor Yankee (January 5th, 2013)

  12. #9
    Fraqrat's Avatar
    Fraqrat is online now Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    1,312
    Thanks
    1,176
    Thanked 1,105 Times in 494 Posts

    Default

    When you're right, you're right tugsailor.
    Share on Facebook

  13. #10
    Tugs's Avatar
    Tugs is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Leesburg, FL
    Posts
    617
    Thanks
    1,106
    Thanked 451 Times in 214 Posts

    Default Re: New twist in stricken rig saga: Shell was moving it to avoid tax

    Quote Originally Posted by Fraqrat View Post
    When you're right, you're right tugsailor.
    I agree x2
    A Good Friend will Bail you out of Jail, But a Great Friend will be sitting right next to you saying WOW that was a Blast!
    Share on Facebook

  14. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    300
    Thanks
    189
    Thanked 233 Times in 128 Posts

    Default Re: New twist in stricken rig saga: Shell was moving it to avoid tax

    Flying home, via Newark, from the GOM I happened to be sitting next to a well dressed man (think Bob Kraft in the owners booth at Gillette). He was a CFO from a smaller exploration company here in the Gulf. I asked what kind of return they made on their investment, say a million dollars. He said they look at a 4-1 return. If they have 5 billion invested they will make a lot more than 20 billion. I don't blame them for not paying taxes legally. I live in New Hampshire which has no state income or sales taxes. Too bad it will cost a lot more than the seven mil they tried to avoid and may void any jobs we may have had up there too. Alaska weather is incomprehensible to most of us in the lower 49 states. Going the great circle route in Jan through Unimak Pass I heard NPR weather report on AM radio say Nome was -40 with ice fog. I live in NH and have never seen ice fog except on Mt Washington. You folks in Alaska earn your money working out on the ocean up there.
    Share on Facebook

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Too bad steam is gone For This Useful Post:

    seacomber (January 7th, 2013)

  16. #12
    Kennebec Captain's Avatar
    Kennebec Captain is online now Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    1,607
    Thanks
    457
    Thanked 852 Times in 445 Posts

    Default Re: New twist in stricken rig saga: Shell was moving it to avoid tax

    I don't see this being much of an issue. To an accountant decreasing expenses or increasing income is the same thing. Mariners move vessels both to make profits and to avoid losses or expenses. Our job is to keep risk at a reasonable level and provide feedback as to what levels of risk the various plans entail.



    K.C.
    Share on Facebook

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •