Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: USCG to DoD? Perhaps.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Seattle, Washington, United States
    Age
    51
    Posts
    1,017
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked 123 Times in 76 Posts

    Default USCG to DoD? Perhaps.

    http://www.executivegov.com/2011/02/...ods-authority/

    With a new name-plate freshly nailed to his Senate office, so to speak, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY.) is proposing shifting authority over the United States Coast Guard from the Department of Homeland Security to the Defense Department, according to an overview of a proposed bill that aims to cut $500 billion from federal spending.

    Cutting the defense budget was once an “eccentric” idea, but Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates efficiencies initiatives have put that notion to rest, the bill overview argues.

    “National defense is the primary constitutional function of the federal government. However, that does not mean that the Department of Defense should receive a blank check without serious oversight,” the proposal reads.

    Among the policy proposals, the proposed bill would shift the Coast Guard to from DHS to DoD, to “promote uniformity, administrative savings and reduce duplicative functions.”

    Before DHS was created in 2003, the Coast Guard was under the authority of the Department of Transportation. However, even under the official auspices of DHS, the Coast Guard works under the Navy after a declaration of war or a presidential order, according to Defense News.

    And, since the start of the Iraq War, the Coast Guard has done extensive work for DoD. Because of that, “common sense would suggest a move,” to the Pentagon, the proposal states.

    Paul’s proposal also includes transferring the primary functions of the Department of Energy to DoD, including nuclear weapon procurement and the disposal of nuclear waste.
    Share on Facebook

  2. #2
    Steamer is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale
    Posts
    683
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked 181 Times in 113 Posts

    Default Re: USCG to DoD? Perhaps.

    Good idea, if it means Merchant Marine oversight is given back to DoT then so much the better. The mismanagement we endure is what the airlines would suffer if they were regulated by the Navy.

    If CG goes to DoD it should be much easier to make the argument for separation.
    Share on Facebook

  3. #3
    anchorman is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mobile, AL
    Posts
    1,648
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked 173 Times in 109 Posts

    Default

    Might have something if drug interdiction, port security, and rescue operations go to DOD, but send the mariner licensing to IBM.......out of government all together
    "Captain standard operating procedure for decision making is to do what feels right to you at the time, and then to give logical sounding justifications for what you were already going to do anyway" -
    Share on Facebook

  4. #4
    Steamer is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale
    Posts
    683
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked 181 Times in 113 Posts

    Default Re: USCG to DoD? Perhaps.

    Quote Originally Posted by anchorman View Post
    but send the mariner licensing to IBM.......out of government all together
    Yeah, that worked really well with Lockheed and the TWIC. 8-)

    Seriously though, there are some things that should be handled by government and I believe "Steamship Inspection" is one of them.

    The FAA seems to work well under DoT, it is managed by industry experts and part of its orginal charter was to promote the aviation industry in the US. I think it is about time that goal was applied to oversight of the American Merchant Marine.
    Share on Facebook

  5. #5
    Archimedes's Avatar
    Archimedes is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Re: USCG to DoD? Perhaps.

    There's serious issues with a military department having law enforcement authority over US citizens within the US (martial law, etc.) Maybe Sen. Paul will get distracted by the next shiny object he sees (gold) and lose interest...
    Share on Facebook

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Archimedes For This Useful Post:

    dougpine (February 2nd, 2011)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2