Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 53

Thread: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

  1. #1
    jdcavo's Avatar
    jdcavo is online now Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,124
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 163 Times in 109 Posts

    Default USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    The Coast Guard has published a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking. The proposed rule will, among other changes, implement the 2010 amendments to STCW. The SNPRM is at:
    http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2011/pdf/2011-17093.pdf
    James D. Cavo
    U.S. Coast Guard
    Mariner Credentialing Program
    Policy Division (CG-5434)
    James.D.Cavo@uscg.mil
    Share on Facebook

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to jdcavo For This Useful Post:

    anchorman (August 1st, 2011), Cal (August 3rd, 2011), Capt. Phoenix (August 4th, 2011), captbbrucato (August 1st, 2011), Conspearasea (August 2nd, 2011), Flyer69 (August 1st, 2011), Jeffrox (August 1st, 2011)

  3. #2
    Skoidat69's Avatar
    Skoidat69 is online now gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
    Age
    31
    Posts
    89
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    Wow reading that gave me a headache... I remember the unions getting all upset at the idea that a junior officer (3rd or 2nd) could upgrade to Master AGT with the CM/M courses and a few years of sea time but not as C/M. Has the requirements to upgrade to CM/M been changed in regards to STCW 2010?
    Strippers changed my life- Brad Pitt
    Share on Facebook

  4. #3
    chemcarrier is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Chipley,Fl
    Posts
    86
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    One commenter suggests that
    mariners with a master 1,600 GRT/3,000
    GT near-coastal or ocean endorsement
    have the opportunity to progress
    directly to the unlimited tonnage master
    endorsement after completion of
    courses, assessments, and testing with 3
    years of service, with at least half of the
    time on vessels of 1,500 GRT or 2,500
    GT ITC.
    This rulemaking has provided a path
    from master limited to master unlimited
    through evidence of completing 6
    months of sea service under the
    authority of the limited endorsement,
    and any assessments, training, and/or
    examinations not previously completed

    Anybody care to comment on this?
    Share on Facebook

  5. #4
    orangejulius is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    61
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    looks like the 500 ton master will be sticking around for the time being as i see it?
    Share on Facebook

  6. #5
    Flyer69 is online now Old Salt
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Maine
    Age
    45
    Posts
    237
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by orangejulius View Post
    looks like the 500 ton master will be sticking around for the time being as i see it?
    Yes, but if you read 11.307 you can apply for the endorsement for STCW endorsement as chief mate on vessels of 1600 GRT/3000 GT or more with one year sea service, competencies, and training.

    11.311 says you can apply for STCW endorsement as master of vessels 200GRT/500GT or more and less than 1600GRT/3000GT with one year sea service, competencies, and training.

    11.313 says you can apply for STCW endorsement as chief mate of vessels 200GRT/500GT or more and less than 1600GRT/3000GT with competencies, and training.
    Let them who know not how to pray, go to sea.
    Share on Facebook

  7. #6
    anchorman is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mobile, AL
    Posts
    1,648
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked 173 Times in 109 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by chemcarrier View Post
    One commenter suggests that
    mariners with a master 1,600 GRT/3,000
    GT near-coastal or ocean endorsement
    have the opportunity to progress
    directly to the unlimited tonnage master
    endorsement after completion of
    courses, assessments, and testing with 3
    years of service, with at least half of the
    time on vessels of 1,500 GRT or 2,500
    GT ITC.
    This rulemaking has provided a path
    from master limited to master unlimited
    through evidence of completing 6
    months of sea service under the
    authority of the limited endorsement,
    and any assessments, training, and/or
    examinations not previously completed

    Anybody care to comment on this?
    You will be able to go from 1600 ton Master to Unlimited Master as it says. ref. 11.305 (d)

    I knew this was in the works already
    "Captain standard operating procedure for decision making is to do what feels right to you at the time, and then to give logical sounding justifications for what you were already going to do anyway" -
    Share on Facebook

  8. #7
    Sukker is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    You can also go to C/M by completing the following:

    12 Months as OICNW
    Take the Test
    & sit through S&R, ARPA, GMDSS, & Medical Care Provider

    According to 11.307

    Every time I see anchorman he's got bad news for me.
    Share on Facebook

  9. #8
    Sukker is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Sukker View Post
    You can also go to C/M by completing the following:

    12 Months as OICNW
    Take the Test
    & sit through S&R, ARPA, GMDSS, & Medical Care Provider

    According to 11.307

    Every time I see anchorman he's got bad news for me.
    And have someone to sign off your assessments.
    Share on Facebook

  10. #9
    anchorman is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mobile, AL
    Posts
    1,648
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked 173 Times in 109 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Sukker View Post
    And have someone to sign off your assessments.
    And drop a "k" and add a "c" ....... Sucker
    "Captain standard operating procedure for decision making is to do what feels right to you at the time, and then to give logical sounding justifications for what you were already going to do anyway" -
    Share on Facebook

  11. #10
    Sukker is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by anchorman View Post
    And drop a "k" and add a "c" ....... Sucker
    How about dropping it all and just saying I got ....ed
    Share on Facebook

  12. #11
    Sukker is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    These are the biggest changes to our industry since 2002 and there has been very little response from everyone. I guess most don't realize that we are basically returning to the rules and regulations for licensing prior to the implementation of STCW.
    Share on Facebook

  13. #12
    jdcavo's Avatar
    jdcavo is online now Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,124
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 163 Times in 109 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    Public meetings are scheduled for Miami (8/22). New Orleans (8/24), Seattle (8/26), and Washington, DC (9/7). See http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2011/pdf/2011-19459.pdf
    James D. Cavo
    U.S. Coast Guard
    Mariner Credentialing Program
    Policy Division (CG-5434)
    James.D.Cavo@uscg.mil
    Share on Facebook

  14. #13
    Flyer69 is online now Old Salt
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Maine
    Age
    45
    Posts
    237
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by jdcavo View Post
    Public meetings are scheduled for Miami (8/22). New Orleans (8/24), Seattle (8/26), and Washington, DC (9/7). See http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2011/pdf/2011-19459.pdf
    Mr. Cavo what is your feeling on timing of impementations of these proposed rules?
    Is there a set timeline for meetings, comments, revision, then implementation?
    Thanks
    Let them who know not how to pray, go to sea.
    Share on Facebook

  15. #14
    Sukker is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Flyer69 View Post
    Mr. Cavo what is your feeling on timing of impementations of these proposed rules?
    Is there a set timeline for meetings, comments, revision, then implementation?
    Thanks
    i.e. When can I expect the NMC to hand deliver my Unlimited Master License?
    Share on Facebook

  16. #15
    Flyer69 is online now Old Salt
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Maine
    Age
    45
    Posts
    237
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Sukker View Post
    i.e. When can I expect the NMC to hand deliver my Unlimited Master License?
    Yeah, because Christmas is not that far away and baby needs new shoes.
    Let them who know not how to pray, go to sea.
    Share on Facebook

  17. #16
    power230 is online now gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    107
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    How can you let a Chief OSV go to the new chief unlimited (chief engineer over 4000 hp management level)? The DDE unlimited can do it but will be restricted to 500 tons. But yet a Chief OSV can have unlimited tonnage? 95% of the chief osv are DDE unlimited. There definitely has to be a tonnage restriction put on it. Or just leave the OSV side as it is. Just blows me away that they do not need sea service but yet a chief limited does. Good luck getting their assessments signed off, no chief unlimited would ever sign off a chief OSV.
    Share on Facebook

  18. #17
    Sukker is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    The proposed rules make it so that no one would to complete the required Management Level Classes for C/M or Master Unlimited. There is also a proposed crossover from Master OSV to Master Unlimited skipping C/M all together.

    Still not a single comment about this from anyone. How many years have we been required to complete all of this training? Now bam overnight no more classes, just sea time, assessments, and test.

    Where are the training schools on this (PMT, MAMA, MITAGS, etc.)?

    Just a little info on myself I'm half way though the Management Level classes for my C/M and in total limbo on what to do. By the time I complete my training the NMC would have changed the rules and removed the training requirements. Its a good feeling to know that I am in the process of burning $30,000 to complete training that is about to become worthless. At least with cocaine and strippers I have a good time while wasting money.

    If the NMC only knew how difficult it is to hit this moving target they have created. Every license, every renewal is a shot in the dark.
    Share on Facebook

  19. #18
    anchorman is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mobile, AL
    Posts
    1,648
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked 173 Times in 109 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by power230 View Post
    How can you let a Chief OSV go to the new chief unlimited (chief engineer over 4000 hp management level)? The DDE unlimited can do it but will be restricted to 500 tons. But yet a Chief OSV can have unlimited tonnage? 95% of the chief osv are DDE unlimited. There definitely has to be a tonnage restriction put on it. Or just leave the OSV side as it is. Just blows me away that they do not need sea service but yet a chief limited does. Good luck getting their assessments signed off, no chief unlimited would ever sign off a chief OSV.
    Don't get confused with the STCW endorsement requirements, the service requirements, and professional requirements. The Chief OSV will not need an Unlimited Chief to sign assessments. Another Chief OSV will be able to do that since the endorsement you are talking about will be required to become a Chief OSV to begin with. Hence, no more time needed for the STCW endorsement, but this is separate of the professional requirements.
    "Captain standard operating procedure for decision making is to do what feels right to you at the time, and then to give logical sounding justifications for what you were already going to do anyway" -
    Share on Facebook

  20. #19
    TJ
    TJ is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    now in the Gulf of Guinea
    Posts
    41
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    I just read through all 175 pages, and I also have a headache... It seems clear that I can go from my 1600T Master to STCW endorsement as Unlimited Master with sea time, some limited classes, and assessments, but what about "provide evidence of meeting the standard of competence specified in STCW A-II/2" it appears that all but ARPA can be from on board experience. Now that I have this STCW endorsement as Unlimited Master, can I use it on a U.S. vessel? The requirements for a "domestic deck officer endorsement" (11.402) still require half of the required experience be from vessels over 1600T/3000ITC, furthermore, it looks like you still need the normal progression of seatime while holding 3/m to go to 2/m, 2/m to c/m...

    Does anyone else make any sense of this?????
    Share on Facebook

  21. #20
    Jeffrox is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,069
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked 46 Times in 33 Posts

    Default Re: USCG Proposed Rule - STCW 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by TJ View Post
    I just read through all 175 pages, and I also have a headache... It seems clear that I can go from my 1600T Master to STCW endorsement as Unlimited Master with sea time, some limited classes, and assessments, but what about "provide evidence of meeting the standard of competence specified in STCW A-II/2" it appears that all but ARPA can be from on board experience. Now that I have this STCW endorsement as Unlimited Master, can I use it on a U.S. vessel? The requirements for a "domestic deck officer endorsement" (11.402) still require half of the required experience be from vessels over 1600T/3000ITC, furthermore, it looks like you still need the normal progression of seatime while holding 3/m to go to 2/m, 2/m to c/m...

    Does anyone else make any sense of this?????
    I didn't study it too well but that's what I read as well; progression to a Unl Master STCW has less requirements than to get the Unl Master endorsed on the MMC.
    Share on Facebook

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2