Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 13

Thread: Horizon Lines sucking wind!

  1. #1
    c.captain's Avatar
    c.captain is online now Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    anyplace other than Bayoo LaFlush!
    Posts
    7,168
    Thanks
    915
    Thanked 2,599 Times in 1,584 Posts

    Default Horizon Lines sucking wind!

    From Maritime Business Strategies website:


    More Developments at Horizon Lines
    Today, Horizon released its 4th quarter results and filed its 10-K for 2011. Read the press release here. Is this company dead in the water or what? Now SFI is stuck with it. If this were not the liner shipping industry, we could let Horizon fail and move on, but the cargo has to move. How bad does this have to get before a real buyer steps up? Horizon doesn't need yet another financial buyer, it needs a strategic buyer, someone who can run the business efficiently and who can modernize the fleet. There are two obvious candidates: I guess that they are both waiting for something more to fall off the Horizon jalopy. April 11, 2012.
    Read the 4th quater financial statement

    $98M operating loss of 2011

    $167M negative shareholder equity

    vis the company if worthless and I have no clue why anybody would keep pumping cash into this sinkhole of antiquted ships and inefficent operations. Tim Colton is right...they have to just die and be done with then some real company needs to start the whole thing anew with modern ships. The cargo is there and the freight rates will support new construction at today's low interest rates. For God's sake Saltchuck (Tote & SeaStar Lines) , you can become the biggest Jone's Act liner trade operator in the US. Don't wait for Horizon to crash and burn and allow the anti Jones Act forces to gain ammunition. Take over the mess, change the name, force the government to assist as the routes are critical and get new ships on order. You know the folks at NASSCO. Have them build basic Korean design ro/lo vessels which there are no unknowns in their construction.

    This is doable! Time to make the US coastwise liner fleet enter the 21st century.

    any Horizon Lines mariners here? Give us your input.
    Share on Facebook

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to c.captain For This Useful Post:

    seadog6608 (April 12th, 2012)

  3. #2
    highseasmechanic's Avatar
    highseasmechanic is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Carlsbd, CA
    Posts
    153
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 51 Times in 33 Posts

    Default Re: Horizon Lines sucking wind!

    I agree with all of this. There are a few companies that I think could jump in on this. However the container market being what it is, along with the large capital to purchase and reinvest in equipment, make it a big risk for any company looking to either expand or enter this market. Companies like Saltchuck or even Crowley have the kind of capital to pull this off. Both are established in the Puerto Rico trade and have a large working capital to pull it off. I recently read this article from World Maritime News about Crowley http://worldmaritimenews.com/archives/51171 Perhaps a sign of things to come. Only time will tell.
    Share on Facebook

  4. #3
    c.captain's Avatar
    c.captain is online now Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    anyplace other than Bayoo LaFlush!
    Posts
    7,168
    Thanks
    915
    Thanked 2,599 Times in 1,584 Posts

    Default Re: Horizon Lines sucking wind!

    An interesting possibility there with Crowley and you're correct that they too can take over Horizon's routes as well. Maybe both Saltchuk and Crowley both are waiting for Horizon to implode and then buy up the valuable assets (terminals and containers) at a tiny fraction of their worth but the routes cannot be taken over without having to use the antique Horizon ships for long enough to get some modern vessels built which would be two to three years.

    Either way, the MMP/MEBA contracts for the Horizon Lines ships go bye bye and AMO gets all those jobs.

    This just made me think about Maersk. Would they be legally able to enter into the coastwise trades as well? Why did they not take them over when the bought SeaLand in the 90's? Did the government prevent them or did Maersk just not want the junk vessels?
    Share on Facebook

  5. #4
    highseasmechanic's Avatar
    highseasmechanic is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Carlsbd, CA
    Posts
    153
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 51 Times in 33 Posts

    Default Re: Horizon Lines sucking wind!

    Perhaps that is the reason Crowley is shopping around for new container ships? Get a jump on fleet replacement for if and when the time comes. Have some new tonnage being finished or even at the ready right as Horizon hits rock bottom and jump right into it. I think Maersk only purchased the international fleet of SeaLand in the 90's. However, if you were Maersk would you want to buy a fleet of old, inefficient, container ships? They could also be a player in this that we are not taking into account. As you stated, everyone is watching and waiting for the bottom to fall out. Lots of possibilities as to what might happen.
    Share on Facebook

  6. #5
    rshrew's Avatar
    rshrew is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,108
    Thanks
    190
    Thanked 288 Times in 192 Posts

    Default

    What about matson? Already established in Seattle, maybe they will make a move?
    Share on Facebook

  7. #6
    c.captain's Avatar
    c.captain is online now Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    anyplace other than Bayoo LaFlush!
    Posts
    7,168
    Thanks
    915
    Thanked 2,599 Times in 1,584 Posts

    Default Re: Horizon Lines sucking wind!

    What about matson? Already established in Seattle, maybe they will make a move?
    I just don't see Matson outside of the narrow range they occupy in Hawaii and transPacific trades. Saltchuk and Crowley both are in Alaska and Puerto Rico already so it is more of expanding what they already have in place with more pure container services.

    Saltchuk is already in the Hawaii interisland trade (they own Young Bros.) but not yet in the US mainland to Hawaii trade so that should be easy for them if they take over the Horizon's terminals. With Crowley, Hawaii would be a mit more effort to build a Hawaii service yet the same goes if they take over Horizon Lines' terminals and equipment. I still say that this opportunity really belongs to Saltchuk right now and I hope they seize it. That is one group who really knows their shit and what they touch always turns to gold. It is rare for me to say it, but that is a bunch I respect greatly and would love to get to work for.
    Share on Facebook

  8. #7
    rshrew's Avatar
    rshrew is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,108
    Thanks
    190
    Thanked 288 Times in 192 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by c.captain

    I just don't see Matson outside of the narrow range they occupy in Hawaii and transPacific trades. Saltchuk and Crowley both are in Alaska and Puerto Rico already so it is more of expanding what they already have in place with more pure container services.

    Saltchuk is already in the Hawaii interisland trade (they own Young Bros.) but not yet in the US mainland to Hawaii trade so that should be easy for them if they take over the Horizon's terminals. With Crowley, Hawaii would be a mit more effort to build a Hawaii service yet the same goes if they take over Horizon Lines' terminals and equipment. I still say that this opportunity really belongs to Saltchuk right now and I hope they seize it. That is one group who really knows their shit and what they touch always turns to gold. It is rare for me to say it, but that is a bunch I respect greatly and would love to get to work for.
    Well I guess time will tell, at any rate someone will have to build some new ships for the run as the emissions standards will most likely not permit older iron from operating in Alaska but you never know.
    Share on Facebook

  9. #8
    c.captain's Avatar
    c.captain is online now Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    anyplace other than Bayoo LaFlush!
    Posts
    7,168
    Thanks
    915
    Thanked 2,599 Times in 1,584 Posts

    Default Re: Horizon Lines sucking wind!

    Well I guess time will tell, at any rate someone will have to build some new ships for the run as the emissions standards will most likely not permit older iron from operating in Alaska but you never know.
    The emissions time bomb also exists in California and none of the steamships Horizon has come close to passing. Steamers are dirty sooty stinky vessels which the entire world (except for the good old US of A) stopped building in the 60's. Steam has been dead for 50 years and yet the US flag fleet is still filled with effing steamers...we should all put a bag over our heads in shame!
    Share on Facebook

  10. #9
    highseasmechanic's Avatar
    highseasmechanic is offline gCaptain Crew
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Carlsbd, CA
    Posts
    153
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 51 Times in 33 Posts

    Default Re: Horizon Lines sucking wind!

    Does Matson have the capital to do a Horizon lines buy out and replace old tonnage? If they did buy out Horizon, wouldn't they be replacing old tonnage with old tonnage? To me it doesn't seem like a strong business model. C.Captain hit the nail on the head. While both Crowley and Saltchuk could potentially make a success out of this. Saltchuk has the upper hand with more established logistics and support. They definitely do have their ducks in a row and know how to operate a business effectively even in tough times. Perhaps we will be seeing a queue to NASSCO for some container ships in the near future? Interesting stuff to say the least.
    Share on Facebook

  11. #10
    rshrew's Avatar
    rshrew is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,108
    Thanks
    190
    Thanked 288 Times in 192 Posts

    Default

    Tote still does have their old two ships sitting around. I know one has been idle in Tacoma for awhile although it is only ro/ro. Could one of these companies take on the lease of the old horizon ships and operate them under the same agreement?
    Share on Facebook

  12. #11
    Texaco is offline Old Salt
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Rocky Mountains
    Posts
    280
    Thanks
    169
    Thanked 60 Times in 45 Posts

    Default Re: Horizon Lines sucking wind!

    Both TOTE and Horizon serve Anchorage from Tacoma. Wouldn't that not be allowed? The Greatland and Westward Venture are 35 +/- yrs old themselves, and steam plants. The Matson ships are getting VERY old. Just sailed on the Lihue (41 yrs old-1971) and put the Lurline in layup (also an ancient ship). They will have to do something soon, as when California's emission requirements reach out 200 miles and get tougher, they won't be able to tun their current fleet. And the 2 mentioned are in really rough shape. TOTE is a great company to work for, at least in the 90's. Doubt that has changed.
    Share on Facebook

  13. #12
    c.captain's Avatar
    c.captain is online now Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    anyplace other than Bayoo LaFlush!
    Posts
    7,168
    Thanks
    915
    Thanked 2,599 Times in 1,584 Posts

    Default Re: Horizon Lines sucking wind!

    Tote still does have their old two ships sitting around. I know one has been idle in Tacoma for awhile although it is only ro/ro. Could one of these companies take on the lease of the old horizon ships and operate them under the same agreement?
    Whatever happens to Horizon Lines, steamers will have to stay around long enough till new tonnage is delivered. Where the two old TOTE ships fit in to me is unclear. That pair has no advantages that I see so I don't think they'd be any part of a Saltchuk takeover of Horizon.

    As has been said previously, maybe Saltchuk & Crowley both are sitting and waiting for the implosion to occur when the one with the stronger hand will grab the spoils which are the routes and terminals but the ships are the weak link in this matrix. That old antiquated tonnage must go and go soon! This recogning is two decades overdue. Perhaps Crowley might be the winner if they get the new tonnage contracted before Saltchuk. Which company is the bigger gambler? Both are privately held so neither need to answer to shareholders.

    Interesting times indeed...
    Share on Facebook

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •