Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Safety Requirements and Manning Exemption Eligibility on Distant Water Tuna Fleet

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Seattle, Washington, United States
    Age
    51
    Posts
    1,017
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked 123 Times in 76 Posts

    Exclamation Safety Requirements and Manning Exemption Eligibility on Distant Water Tuna Fleet

    [Notices]
    [Page 3646-3647]
    From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
    [DOCID:fr20ja11-89]

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

    Coast Guard

    [Docket No. USCG-2010-1146]


    Safety Requirements and Manning Exemption Eligibility on Distant
    Water Tuna Fleet Vessels

    AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

    ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------

    SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 904 of the 2010 Coast Guard Authorization
    Act, the Coast Guard announces the availability of a draft policy
    regarding distant water tuna fleet vessels manning exemption
    eligibility and safety requirements. We request your comments on the
    Safety Requirements and Manning Exemption Eligibility on Distant Water
    Tuna Fleet Vessels.

    DATES: Comments and related material must either be submitted to our
    online docket via http://www.regulations.gov on or before February 22,
    2011 or reach the Docket Management Facility by that date.

    ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
    2010-1146 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
    Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
    Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
    p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
    number is 202-366-9329.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
    the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
    submitting comments.

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice,
    call or e-mail Jonathan G. Wendland, Fishing Vessel Safety Division
    (CG-5433), U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 202-375-1245, e-mail
    jonathan.g.wendland@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
    submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
    Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments and related material on the
    draft policy on Safety Requirements and Manning Exemption Eligibility
    on Distant Water Tuna Fleet Vessels. All comments received will be
    posted, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov and will include
    any personal information you have provided.
    Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include the
    docket number for this notice (USCG-2010-1146) and provide a reason for
    each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and
    material online, or by fax, mail or hand delivery, but please use only
    one of these means. We recommend that you include your name and a
    mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
    of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
    regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov and
    type ``USCG-2010-1146'' in the ``Keyword'' box. If you submit your
    comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no
    larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic
    filing. If you submit them by mail and would like to know that they
    reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard
    or envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
    the comment period.
    Viewing the comments and related material: To view the comments,
    the draft policy, the USCG Marine Safety Manual Volume III Marine
    Industry Personnel, MSC.1/Circ.1163/Rev.6/(commonly referred to as
    ``the White List'') and STCW A-I/10 as referenced in the draft policy,
    go to http://www.regulations.gov, click on the ``read comments'' box,
    which will then become highlighted in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box
    insert ``USCG-2010-1146'' and click ``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket
    Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column. If you do not have access to the
    Internet, you may view the docket online by visiting the Docket
    Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
    Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
    SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
    Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an agreement with the
    Department of Transportation to use the Docket Management Facility.
    Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of comments
    received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
    submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
    of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review a
    Privacy Act, system of records notice regarding our public dockets in
    the January 17, 2008, issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

    Background and Purpose

    The Coast Guard Maritime Transportation Act (CGMTA) of 2006
    (section 421) authorized United States-documented purse seine vessels
    fishing for highly migratory species (under a license issued pursuant
    to the 1987 South Pacific Tuna Treaty [SPTT]) to use foreign citizens,
    except for the master, to meet manning requirements if no United States
    citizen personnel are readily available. The manning exemption was only
    applicable to vessels operating in and out of American Samoa. That
    authorization was for a 48-month period and ended on July 11, 2010.
    Section 904 of the 2010 Coast Guard Authorization Act (CGAA),
    signed into law (Pub. L. 111-281) on 15 October

    [[Page 3647]]

    2010, reauthorized for a period of two years the use of foreign
    citizens (excluding the master) on United States-documented purse seine
    vessels in the Distant Water Tuna Fleet (DWTF). This reauthorized
    manning exemption also only applies to vessels operating in and out of
    American Samoa. In addition, the 2010 CGAA added a safety examination
    requirement such that a vessel's owner/operator may not employ a
    foreign citizen to meet a manning requirement unless it first
    successfully completes an annual dockside safety examination by an
    individual authorized to enforce part B of subtitle II of title 46,
    United States Code. Furthermore, the 2010 CGAA also amended 46 U.S.C.
    4502 establishing requirements for an individual in charge of a vessel
    to keep a record of equipment maintenance and required instruction and
    drills, and for a vessel to be issued a certificate of compliance upon
    successfully completing a dockside safety examination. The
    reauthorization retained the restriction that a foreign officer engaged
    to fill a position must hold a valid license or certificate issued in
    accordance with the International Convention on Standards of Training,
    Certification, and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, as amended, standards
    and by an authority recognized by the Coast Guard. The manning
    exemption reauthorization is set to expire December 31, 2012.
    We are requesting your comments for consideration in preparing the
    final Coast Guard policy that is intended to clarify the requirements
    enabling a DWTF vessel to take advantage of the temporary manning
    exemption.

    Authority

    This notice is issued under authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a).

    Dated: January 13, 2011.
    Kevin S. Cook,
    Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Director of Prevention Policy.
    [FR Doc. 2011-1191 Filed 1-19-11; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
    Share on Facebook

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Seattle, Washington, United States
    Age
    51
    Posts
    1,017
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked 123 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: Safety Requirements and Manning Exemption Eligibility on Distant Water Tuna Flee

    USCG-2010-1146-0004.1.pdf

    Here is a copy of the draft policy letter. You'll see that the requirements for a manning exemption have been bolstered. Please submit comments if this is an issue of concern for you.
    Share on Facebook

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to dougpine For This Useful Post:

    john (January 26th, 2011)

  4. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Seattle, Washington, United States
    Age
    51
    Posts
    1,017
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked 123 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: Safety Requirements and Manning Exemption Eligibility on Distant Water Tuna Flee

    Here's the Federal Register notice, published today 01 June 2011:


    [Federal Register Volume 76, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 31, 2011)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 31351-31352]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 2011-13319]


    -----------------------------------------------------------------------

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

    Coast Guard

    [Docket No. USCG-2010-1146]


    Safety Requirements and Manning Exemption Eligibility on Distant
    Water Tuna Fleet Vessels

    AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

    ACTION: Notice of availability.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------

    SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces the availability of Office of Vessel
    Activities Policy Letter 11-05 regarding Distant Water Tuna Fleet
    vessels manning exemption eligibility and safety requirements. This
    final policy clarifies the requirements to allow a distant water tuna
    fleet vessel to engage foreign citizens under a temporary manning
    exemption.

    DATES: This policy will become effective on July 1, 2011.

    ADDRESSES: This notice and the policy are available in the docket and
    can be viewed by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-
    2011-1146 in the ``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This
    material is also available for inspection or copying at the Docket
    Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West
    Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
    Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
    except Federal Holidays. This policy is also available at http://www.fishsafe.info/CG-543 Policy Letter 11-05.

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice,
    call or e-mail Jack A. Kemerer, Fishing Vessel Safety Division (CG-
    5433), U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-1249, e-mail
    jack.a.kemerer@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
    material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
    Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.

    Background and Purpose

    The Coast Guard Maritime Transportation Act (CGMTA) of 2006
    (section 421) authorized U.S.-documented purse seine vessels fishing
    for highly migratory species (under a license issued pursuant to the
    1987 South Pacific Tuna Treaty [SPTT]) to use foreign licensed
    personnel, except for the master, to meet manning requirements. That
    authorization was for a 48-month period and ended on July 11, 2010.
    Section 904 of the 2010 Coast Guard Authorization Act (CGAA, signed
    into law (Pub. L. 111-281) on October 15, 2010) reauthorized the use of
    foreign officers, excluding the master, on U.S.-documented purse seine
    vessels in the Distant Water Tuna Fleet. The CGAA reauthorization added
    a safety examination requirement such that a vessel's owner/operator
    may not employ a foreign national to meet a manning requirement unless
    it first successfully completes an annual dockside safety examination
    by an individual authorized to enforce part B of subtitle II of title
    46, United States Code. Additionally, the 2010 CGAA also amended Title
    46 United States Code Section 4502 by establishing requirements for an
    individual in charge of a vessel to keep a record of equipment
    maintenance, and required instruction and drills, and for a vessel to
    be issued a certificate of compliance upon successfully completing a
    dockside safety examination. The reauthorization retained the
    restriction that a foreign officer engaged to fill a position must hold
    a valid license or certificate issued in accordance with STCW 95
    standards and by an authority recognized by the Coast Guard. Also, the
    manning exemption is only applicable to vessels operating in and out of
    America Samoa. The manning exemption reauthorization is set to expire
    December 31, 2012.

    Discussion of Summary of Comments Received and Changes

    The Coast Guard published a Notice of Availability and Request for
    Comments on a draft policy; Safety Requirements and Manning Exemption
    Eligibility on Distant Water Tuna Fleet Vessels in the Federal Register
    on January 20, 2011 Docket Number [USCG-2010-1146]. We received
    comments from eight individuals in response to the draft Safety
    Requirements and Manning Exemption Eligibility on Distant Water Tuna
    Fleet Vessels policy.\1\ A general summary of the comments received and
    the United States Coast Guard's responses to those comments are
    presented below.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Although the comment period on the notice was set to close
    on February 22, 2011, the Coast Guard was able to consider all
    comments submitted to the docket prior to March 1, 2011.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    One commenter supported eliminating the manning exemption
    permanently while seven commenters

    [[Page 31352]]

    suggested they support the manning exemption, at least to some extent.
    Four commenters suggested the timely notice requirement for
    engaging foreign officers is too burdensome or impracticable. The Coast
    Guard agrees in some cases that a timely advance notice of a vacancy
    may be impracticable. The Coast Guard has revised its final policy
    guidance under 6.(a)(v) to include the wording ``to the extent
    practicable.'' However, since licensed positions often have contracts
    associated with them, it is reasonable for an owner/operator to have an
    idea when a position may become vacant and to advertise appropriately.
    The Coast Guard considered timely notice further and reduced the
    position vacancy announcement from 60 days to 30 days for a position
    becoming available.
    Five commenters suggested qualified U.S.-licensed mariners are hard
    to find, while one commenter suggested the exemption was meant only for
    vessels working from American Samoa, and temporary so owners could
    train U.S. citizens to fill officer vacancies. The Coast Guard agrees
    that the temporary exemption is a recognition of the difficulty DWTF
    vessel owners/operators have historically dealt with when seeking to
    find qualified U.S.-licensed mariners, but notes that the temporary
    exemption represents an additional opportunity for DWTF vessel owners/
    operators to develop capacity and skills of United States mariners to
    fill licensed positions on those vessels.
    Two commenters supported at least annual port calls in American
    Samoa while two commenters did not support requiring port calls in
    American Samoa. The Coast Guard maintains that at least one annual port
    call in American Samoa shall occur if foreign licensed mariners are
    sought and utilized on a United States flagged DWTF vessel, as the
    manning exemption is only applicable to vessels operating in and out of
    America Samoa.
    One commenter supported adding Taiwan to the list of acceptable
    countries listed in the International Maritime Organizations (IMO's) so
    called ``White List.'' This comment is outside of the scope of the
    policy announced in this policy letter, as the United States cannot on
    its own revise the IMO ``White List''.
    One commenter offered alternative proposals to demonstrate non-
    availability of U.S. Officers. The Coast Guard, on a case-by-case
    basis, may consider alternative approaches in demonstrating non-
    availability if the approach demonstrates that the vessel owner/
    operator satisfies the requirements of the law.
    One commenter suggested the policy cannot be classified as an
    interpretive rule because the policy imposes additional duties and
    requirements. The Coast Guard disagrees; any additional duties and
    requirements may be traced to the statutory exemption. For instance,
    the law requires that there be non-availability of United States
    licensed workers; this policy describes the means by which a DWTF
    vessel owner/operator may demonstrate such non-availability, namely by
    recounting the good faith efforts made to locate and hire United States
    licensed mariners. However, in response to this comment, the Coast
    Guard reduced some of the information requested in the draft policy,
    including wages, benefits, and Department of Labor worker codes.
    The final policy lists an additional item under Guidance 6 a.(vii)
    not listed in the draft policy that requires the owner/operator to make
    a written agreement with each seaman employed on the vessel, on a
    voyage from a port in the United States. This existing legal
    requirement can be found in Title 46 United States Code Sec. 10601
    (Fishing Agreements), and was added to the policy to aid in compliance.
    This notice is issued under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a).

    Dated: May 20, 2011.
    Kevin S. Cook,
    Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Director of Prevention Policy.
    [FR Doc. 2011-13319 Filed 5-27-11; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
    Share on Facebook

  5. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Seattle, Washington, United States
    Age
    51
    Posts
    1,017
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked 123 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: Safety Requirements and Manning Exemption Eligibility on Distant Water Tuna Flee

    Share on Facebook

  6. #5
    Jeffrox is offline Top Contributer
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,069
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked 46 Times in 33 Posts

    Default Re: Safety Requirements and Manning Exemption Eligibility on Distant Water Tuna Flee

    Doug, would you say this policy provides more teeth for US Mariners to get aboard the DWTF vessels in greater numbers? Or will it just be a case of the Korean scammers having to work a little harder to keep the US Mariners at bay?
    Kamsahamnida, Jeff
    Share on Facebook

  7. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Seattle, Washington, United States
    Age
    51
    Posts
    1,017
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked 123 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: Safety Requirements and Manning Exemption Eligibility on Distant Water Tuna Flee

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffrox View Post
    Doug, would you say this policy provides more teeth for US Mariners to get aboard the DWTF vessels in greater numbers? Or will it just be a case of the Korean scammers having to work a little harder to keep the US Mariners at bay?
    Kamsahamnida, Jeff
    I think it does. From my conversations and correspondence with the USCG regarding this issue I got the impression that they are quite serious about enforcing the new policy.

    Requiring dockside inspections and an annual trip into American Samoa helps. Also the case-by-case nature of each exemption and the required documentation should help. I do wish that the USCG had required more than one American onboard and had made English language skills a requirement as well.

    The Koreans and others are quite creative and I'm sure that they will do their best to get around this as they have in the past. Only time will tell of course, but the work is there and any American licensed deck or engineering officer who is interested should apply when these positions come up. The owners and operators have to document each applicant, their interview, and if not hired provide the justification for that decision.
    Share on Facebook

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to dougpine For This Useful Post:

    skipjackmac (June 6th, 2011)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: July 16th, 2010, 01:57 PM
  2. SSCS to attack tuna fishers, Cut nets
    By MikeE1849 in forum Professional Mariner Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: June 26th, 2010, 11:04 AM
  3. Boycott Starkist Tuna
    By danzante in forum YOUblog
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: January 12th, 2010, 09:56 PM
  4. Captain for Tuna Fishing
    By bigeye in forum Maritime Employment
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: December 14th, 2009, 03:52 PM
  5. European Union: NO to Tuna Ban
    By bloggervb in forum Blog Comments
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 22nd, 2009, 08:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2