E.P.A. Petitioned to Limit Ship Emissions
Photo by Seth White
The New York Times has the story on a California petition to limit ship emissions:
The California attorney general and a coalition of environmental groups have called for federal regulation to curb heat-trapping emissions from the worldwide fleet of about 90,000 oceangoing ships, including container ships, tankers and cruise ships.
The regulations, sought in separate petitions to the Environmental Protection Agency, would apply to United States territorial waters.
Only six countries generate more emissions of greenhouse gases than the world’s oceangoing vessels, said Michael Hirshfield, a senior scientist with Oceana, an ocean-protection organization.
The group’s petition, whose participants included the Center for Biological Diversity and Friends of the Earth, argues that “the sheer number of these ships, coupled with operating practices that use fuel inefficiently and poor government oversight, results in carbon dioxide emissions” equal to the emissions of 130 million to 195 million cars. Continue Reading….
Joe Angelo, the deputy managing director of Intertanko, a group representing independent tanker operators, said the best approach was “to reduce emissions worldwide — universally — not just unilateral action in the United States or the European Union.”
INTERTANKO’s solution? Here is a report from their June 2007 study on emissions:
The environmental footprint of ships, which carry 90% of world trade covering over 30,000 billion tonne-miles a year, is extremely light compared to other forms of transport. And yet despite the industry’s tonne-mile efficiency, it has been left behind by other sectors which are already regulated and compelled to use clean, environmentally friendly fuels. This means that the shipping industry has become an easy-to-pick fruit, recently targeted by politicians eager to show that they are still doing something on the environmental front.
A switch from residual fuel to marine diesel oil (MDO) means a comprehensive and practical strategy for an efficient and long-term reduction of air pollution from ships. Should one expect ships to reduce air pollution while still burning residual fuels? These fuels have a significant content of sulphur, nitrogen (that contributes to the NOx emissions and thereby ozone or a greenhouse gas), hazardous components including heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) that combine to create a cocktail of particulate emissions and generated sludge
The proposal that the shipping industry switches to distillate bunker fuel (MDO) according to a timescale that takes into account fuel availability, delivers immediate, real and global reductions in atmospheric pollution (SOx, NOx and PM). It deals with the cause of this pollution rather than the effect – i.e. rather than limiting the rulemaking development to cleaning up the pollution itself. These are among the reasons that this proposal has been gaining support from a number of IMO states – including Norway.
This seems to be in contrast with the California petition which calls for elimination of bunker fuel and a proposed reduction of vessel speed by 20%. Considering our industry lives by the motto “Time is Money” it’s not surprising that INTERTANKO is looking for alternative solutions or fighting any actions that would mandate speed reductions. I may be stating the obvious but wouldn’t speed reductions increase the demand for hulls? Wouldn’t this be in the interests of an organization of ship owners?
This debate is destined to expand in direct relation to the growth of our global warming problems. When the argument is settled, whether by the EPA or IMO, I doubt the solutions will be those suggested in the petition or by INTERTANKO but I’m hopeful the coverage will increase awareness and development of workable solutions… that is if the press can avoid misleading and counterproductive headlines like THIS.
CLICK HERE for Maritime News Discoverer stories on Vessel Emissions.
Related Links;
- The EU’s Ship Emissions Strategy
- Shipping bodies challenge EU pollution rule
- Measures for sustainable shipping (Shipping Gazette)
- A look at Modes of Transportation with regard to emissions
Related Articles:
John Konrad
Captain John Konrad is co-founder of Unofficial Networks, Editor In Chief of this blog and author of the book Fire On The Horizon. He is a USCG licensed Master Mariner of Unlimited Tonnage and, since graduating from SUNY Maritime College, has sailed a variety of ships from ports around the world. John currently lives in Morro Bay, California with his wife and two children.
Post A Comment
News
- Horizon Reliance Responds to High Seas Distress Call, Rescues Family of Three [VIDEO]
- Jensen to Design Custom “Super Pumper” Fireboat for City of San Francisco
- By the Numbers: How Much Does Somali Piracy Cost? [REPORT]
- G6 Alliance Set to Launch Asia-Europe Liner Service
- Rabaul Shipping Fleet Seized in Papua-New Guinea by Angry Mob
Forum- MSC: BUC increase USA to S. America West Coast, Central America, Caribbean rob
- MSC: BUC increase from Canada to S. America West Coast, Central America, Caribbean rob
- MSC:GRI Announcement on cargo from the West Mediterranean and Adriatic - Red Sea rob
- MARKET TALK: Daiwa Upgrades SembCorp To Outperform From Hold rob
- Tanker Market Update - Knightsbridge Tankers [REPORT] rob
- CBP Regulations Pertaining to Escopeta Oil Fines RichMadden
- Maritime Matters to the US Pacific Northwest and other "NEWS" captfish
- How militaristic is MMA? Physical requirements? ahmerriam
- First Ship Lease Likely To Fall; Berlian Laju Defaults on Chemical Tankers rob
- entry level MMC Jnx
Subscribe
Click HERE for gCaptain’s free daily newsletter.Find Us On Google+







