In October of last year the Shipping & Transport College of Rotterdam held the International Maritime English Conference. A key topic of debate was the IMO’s current review of the STCW Convention and its focus on global assessment goals for non-native english speakers. This is of particular concern considering the growing shortage of qualified mariners combined with the unusually high incident rate seen in recent months.
Clive Cole of World Maritime University and Peter Trenkner of Wismar University have proposed implementing a Yardstick “against which student performance can be measured while at the same time providing goals for the tasks and requirements of the seaboard ranks”. Here is the plan as laid out in their position paper:
>The Yardstick >
>When developing the Yardstick below the authors deliberately did not include the identification of Maritime English communication requirements of the different shipboard rating ranks, i.e. the STCW95 Support Level, but restricted themselves to the personnel covered by the STCW95 Operational and Management Level educated and trained at higher MET institutions.
>
>The shipping industry, however, may wish to have a Yardstick available for shipboard rating ranks, too. In this case an appendix would need to be developed together with the industry as the Maritime English requirements set out in the STCW95 (Part A, Chapter II, Table A-II/4 and A-III/4) regarding ratings are comparatively vague and need to be considered in the review of STCW95.
>
>Furthermore, requirements concerning general English language proficiency have not been included
>
>expressis verbis
>
> as in the authors’ understanding a certain command of general English is a basic prerequisite in this respect (cf IMO SMCP 2002).
>
>
>
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
>
>
Click HERE to download the full report.
Am I reading this right?? Navigational officers wold be allowed “Frequent lapses in accuracy, fluency, appropriateness and discourse, but usually succeeds in communicating.”? !?!?!
Well it says “Assistant” Navigation Officers
and that means what?
Am I reading this right?? Navigational officers wold be allowed “Frequent lapses in accuracy, fluency, appropriateness and discourse, but usually succeeds in communicating.”? !?!?!
Well it says “Assistant” Navigation Officers
and that means what?
[...] on DIY Waterproof USB Flash DriveOrniphobe on Pipe LabelingShipDrivr on English For Maritime Students – STCW Competency EvaluationCarl on English For Maritime Students – STCW [...]
[...] not communicate with others to listen to or share your [...]
this yardstick is a copy of ESOL/Cambridge “IELTS” Examination somehow linked to the STCW requirements, just have a look to the British Council English Examinations!
I’m sure they can come up with a better idea, simpler and more geared towards our needs, meaning that the IELTS yardstick is not adequate for MARITIME ENGLISH. In this sense I believe it should link the special need for maritme need whereas IELTS’s yardstick is for english proficiency in general.
this yardstick is a copy of ESOL/Cambridge “IELTS” Examination somehow linked to the STCW requirements, just have a look to the British Council English Examinations!
I’m sure they can come up with a better idea, simpler and more geared towards our needs, meaning that the IELTS yardstick is not adequate for MARITIME ENGLISH. In this sense I believe it should link the special need for maritme need whereas IELTS’s yardstick is for english proficiency in general.
I think this hole idea is good.
I think this hole idea is good.
just asking? what is the yardstick for? is maritme english part of the qualifying examination for marines? wish to see a sample of the test for the purpose of teaching
just asking? what is the yardstick for? is maritme english part of the qualifying examination for marines? wish to see a sample of the test for the purpose of teaching